It is so adorable every time you declare yourself winner of our retarded internet exchanges.
It doesn't matter which of your real or imagined Ph.D. bffs you assure us agrees with you 100% to discount their own degree; I was just using your silly pronouncement that you were going to read through...
lolz...you haven't lost your superiority complex.
I shouldn't have to remind you of the content of a post you made a mere handful of hours ago, but I will gladly do so. You suddenly appeared in this thread with all the confidence of a 5 year old going to kindergarten for the first time and...
It is rather flattering and amusing that you felt you to had to run to your Darwiniac clergy to take me on. In a narrow sense I agree with both of you cultists in that I don't expect someone with an advanced degree in Darwinism to have any more knowledge of real science than your average...
I applied relevant quotes like my heroes. If Darwinian cultists define "any change" future or past as "evolution" "evolution" necessarily has to be true...at least in their Darwiniac world.
Kicking a ball, shooting a basket, or throwing a pass is movement by design.
Logically...
NO, the dangerous thing is not making it crystal clear to aggressive asses that their advances are unwanted and not reporting their threats to the police.
If "strict policies" include no due process for the accused that's horrible policy coming from flawed data.
No way college "tribunals" should replace real police work and proper prosecution.
Now "not sure" means "no?"
OneBrow insists every woman's "not sure" means "yes."
Are these chicks too damn retarded to be able to say "no" if that's what they mean? I always figured "no" was one of a baby's first words and most of them use it often once they learn it.
You liberal feminists...
If all "ways" are labled "evolution" of course evolution can't help but be truth.
Real scientists don't claim "any movement is gravity" in the way cultist onebrow claims "any change is evolution."
The invisible force that causes a predictable and specific type of movement is labeled...
You've already lost credibility on the subject, there is no reason to repeat your assertion that females are wishywashy.
If you agree with counting a woman's "not sure" as a "yes" on the poll you can't call a like-minded guy a rapist for doing the same in a sexual situation.
That's what the cultists say, but a few have reluctantly conceded to preserve their scientific integrity.
Tom Cavalier-Smith (Evolutionary Biologist): For none of the cases mentioned by Behe is there yet a comprehensive and detailed explanation of the probable steps in the evolution of the...
Don't get your atheist panties in a bunch.
We weren't talking about "sexual assault." We were talking about sex where both participants are drunk. Unlike the feminazis I don't claim all "alcohol facilitated" sex is automatically rape.
The pollsters counted all women's "not sure's" as "yeses" and you try to justify that in a "Yes means yes" thread. I can't really take your cries of "rape culture" seriously after that.
I also left out that they included all instances of drunk sex as rape even when the woman didn't.
A...
Opinions ain't science.
Darwinism is the pseudoscience. Darwin Cultists try to infuse it into real science but that only corrupts real science.
A biochemist showed me how he "broke down" Darwin's theory on Darwin's own terms. Ever since then all I see is nothing but a bunch of Darwin...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.