Not knowing how to spell Boomhauer is one thing. Not knowing his name at all is quite another.
Ahhh, I thought his name was that, but wasn't sure. Didn't want to sound like a scrub. Do you hear it though?
Not knowing how to spell Boomhauer is one thing. Not knowing his name at all is quite another.
The only concern would be if Kanter is somehow the Greg Oden of this draft.
The point is nobody is confusing Kanter with Duncan who was as sure a thing as there ever was in the NBA draft just because they're physically similar.
I tried to watch video of Burks a while back and strangely there's not a lot. I like what I've read. But he intrigues me for sure.
He has a combine interview which is pretty good, besides the fact he says the phrase "you know" to begin and end each sentence he says, but I'm guessing that is just nerves of being in front of a camera.
I literally don't care at all how a guy sounds in an interview. I barely care what they say unless its something really wacky. They're all 18 to 20 year old kids trying to say the right thing. I only care how they play.
I actually find interviews extremely important. Mostly how realistic their perception of themselves is. For example: Travis Leslie said he wants to be compared to someone other than Tony Allen. He thinks he can be better than Allen and all Allen does is play defense. Leslie is a player who has zero offensive game, yet clearly thinks of himself as an offensive player. If he has this mindset he isn't going to make it in the NBA for long. On the other hand, take a guy like Kenneth Fariehd. He knows who he is and knows what he has to do in the NBA.
It drives me crazy anyone thinks Singleton is worth drafting. DraftExpress has him at 19 which is about right, but he's a late first. His offensive numbers aren't good, but they look passable at a glance on the season. Inside the numbers is where you can see the enormous flaws.
In ACC games he shot 40%, 29 from 3
He only scored over 20 four times which included a killer game against Butler, 2 ACC games, and Auburn (the dregs of the SEC)
He had a few nice games against quality competition, but mostly he got eaten up the better the teams were.
And that's after 3 years in college. Singleton is a defensive specialist. That's it. You don't draft that at 12.
From DraftExpress.com https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Chris-Singleton-1342/#ixzz1MxGtxhtDSingleton's jump shot is a good place to start since it will be crucial to the success he enjoys as an NBA player. He's taking slightly less of them this year but is making the ones he does attempt at a better rate. He has nice shooting mechanics (albeit with an average touch), so it was only a matter of time until this started happening, especially once his shot selection improved. Through 14 games, Singleton has converted 24 of his 62 jump shots (39%), up from 36-of-134 (22%) last year – a major improvement.
Digging deeper, we find that he's simply been a lot more effective spotting up with his feet set this season, converting nearly half of his attempts of this nature (as opposed to 29% last season). Considering his likely role in the NBA, that's a very encouraging development. Can he continue to shoot like that for the rest of the season and in private workouts for NBA teams?
3 things-
1. Every draft can only be compared against itself. Singleton could arguably be BPA at 12.
2. Singleton has greatly improved his set jumpshot. That is his offensive contribution.
From DraftExpress.com https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Chris-Singleton-1342/#ixzz1MxGtxhtD
https://www.draftexpress.com
3. He was the go to option on a putrid florida state team. So what that will not be his role in the NBA.
It drives me crazy anyone thinks Singleton is worth drafting. DraftExpress has him at 19 which is about right, but he's a late first. His offensive numbers aren't good, but they look passable at a glance on the season. Inside the numbers is where you can see the enormous flaws.
In ACC games he shot 40%, 29 from 3
He only scored over 20 four times which included a killer game against Butler, 2 ACC games, and Auburn (the dregs of the SEC)
He had a few nice games against quality competition, but mostly he got eaten up the better the teams were.
And that's after 3 years in college. Singleton is a defensive specialist. That's it. You don't draft that at 12.
Why not?
If Singleton is a better defensive version of Thabo Sefolosha, that's not a guy you draft at 12? Who do you draft at 12? A shooting SPECIALIST? A Euro you won't see for years? A guy who isn't talented enough to be top 10? What?
Because you're assuming the absolute that Singleton is a sure thing as a defensive ace. However likely you assume it to be, it isn't assured. What is relatively assured is that he'll be about as effective as Thabo on offense. At 12, you have to be setting the bar a little higher than "likely defensive ace AT THE WING." I'm completely on board with drafting an interior defensive ace that high, not a wing.