What's new

2014 College Football

I just read that byu is #1 in the nation in amount of penalties against, and #1 in penalty yards.

Hopefully bronco can get that cleaned up. Strange that a team with older (more mature?) players would lead the nation in penalties.

They've had more than their share of just awful refs/calls too as evidenced recently by Craig Bills almost being kicked out the game before a video review overturned and then Koroma actually getting thrown out....and video review overturning his would be suspension a few days later. You could do that for so many plays already this year if it were worth anything. That UCONN game was especially brutal ref wise.
 
They've had more than their share of just awful refs/calls too as evidenced recently by Craig Bills almost being kicked out the game before a video review overturned and then Koroma actually getting thrown out....and video review overturning his would be suspension a few days later. You could do that for so many plays already this year if it were worth anything. That UCONN game was especially brutal ref wise.
One of the downsides of independence..... usually using the officials from the opponents conference
 
Yeah, the refs are always making bad calls for my favorite teams too! Must be the same ones! What are the odds?!
 
Yeah, the refs are always making bad calls for my favorite teams too! Must be the same ones! What are the odds?!

Lolz.

I learned that I am a 100% ridiculous homer this year because of the #tank.

Every season of my life the jazz had gotten screwed by the refs almost every game! Then, the year I wanted the jazz to lose, we got EVERY single call to go our way!! Lol


£¥£
 
The utes in 2008 had a number of ugly wins.

None uglier (and I didn't see it mentioned) than the win over TCU. Lil brother, you know that game should have been a huge L. You know it. How many chip shot field goals did their kicker wiff on in that game? 3? 4?

You have a greater chance of connecting on 4th and 18 than missing 3 chip shots.
 
The utes in 2008 had a number of ugly wins.

None uglier (and I didn't see it mentioned) than the win over TCU. Lil brother, you know that game should have been a huge L. You know it. How many chip shot field goals did their kicker wiff on in that game? 3? 4?

You have a greater chance of connecting on 4th and 18 than missing 3 chip shots.


There are a lot of missed FG's in college football.
 
The utes in 2008 had a number of ugly wins.

None uglier (and I didn't see it mentioned) than the win over TCU. Lil brother, you know that game should have been a huge L. You know it. How many chip shot field goals did their kicker wiff on in that game? 3? 4?

You have a greater chance of connecting on 4th and 18 than missing 3 chip shots.

File a petition and see if you can get 2008 overturned.
 
One of the downsides of independence..... usually using the officials from the opponents conference

Yeah, the refs are always making bad calls for my favorite teams too! Must be the same ones! What are the odds?!

Actually my post doesn't say anything about refs making bad calls for my favorite team.

Does your favorite team use the refs from your opponents conference every game though? That is what I was actually referring to.
If your team did always use the refs from your opponents conference, would you think that would be advantageous for your team?
 
Actually my post doesn't say anything about refs making bad calls for my favorite team.

Does your favorite team use the refs from your opponents conference every game though? That is what I was actually referring to.
If your team did always use the refs from your opponents conference, would you think that would be advantageous for your team?

To be fair, most ppl's favorite team's have actually been invited to a conference.


£¥£
 
To be fair, most ppl's favorite team's have actually been invited to a conference.


£¥£
True.
Byu is in a different situation than most teams.
 
The utes in 2008 had a number of ugly wins.

None uglier (and I didn't see it mentioned) than the win over TCU. Lil brother, you know that game should have been a huge L. You know it. How many chip shot field goals did their kicker wiff on in that game? 3? 4?

You have a greater chance of connecting on 4th and 18 than missing 3 chip shots.

He he. Great stuff in here.
 
Actually my post doesn't say anything about refs making bad calls for my favorite team.

Maybe not, but Duck's sure does.

Using refs from the opposing conference doesn't matter. Not like they're getting bonuses if their conference does well. Sure, there are some bad calls fttt, but it's because they are college refs. How many times is the winner or loser decided on a bad call by a referee? Idk, maybe .000000000001% of the time.
 
Maybe not, but Duck's sure does.

Using refs from the opposing conference doesn't matter. Not like they're getting bonuses if their conference does well. Sure, there are some bad calls fttt, but it's because they are college refs. How many times is the winner or loser decided on a bad call by a referee? Idk, maybe .000000000001% of the time.
I think refs want teams in thier conference to do well. That way they have more opportunities to be officiating bigger games on bigger stages with a better chance to be noticed which gives them a better chance at job advancement.

I do think it's weird though that conferences employ and pay thier own officials though. Seems like there should just be general officials for ncaa football.... kinda like the nfl.

I wonder why there are not nfc south specific officials, or afc east officials etc in the nfl.

Officials are humans and I'm quite sure they have favorite teams. If I were an official and lived in California and all my officiating was for pac 12 games and I was officiating a game between usc and texas and there was a big play in a close game that could go either way, I know I would make the call in the favor of usc. I'm human after all and it's a 50/50 play anyway so it's not like it's obvious, but I would definitely lean toward the team from the conference that signs my paychecks.
 
Actually the more I think about it, the ncaa has a spotless history of never breaking rules, cheating, lying, making mistakes, or ever doing anything corrupt or unethical.

I'm sure the officials are totally unbiased, salt of the earth, perfect people who always do the right thing and would never dream of favoring a team from the conference they work for and gives them exposure
 
"Damn refs!" - every fan ever
I must be a unique fan. Sometimes I think the refs do a fantastic job in some games.
 
With that said, some refs seriously **** up, and it can swing the outcomes of games.


With that said, rarely do some refs have it out for particular teams, or particular players. So we're all in this together, as fan bases. Just deal with it.
 
With that said, some refs seriously **** up, and it can swing the outcomes of games.


With that said, rarely do some refs have it out for particular teams, or particular players. So we're all in this together, as fan bases. Just deal with it.

I agree with this post.......... however in college football each conference has their own officials. So every team in those conferences have officials representing them. There are some teams that don't belong to a conference (I think about 5 teams or so) and those teams do not have officials representing them.
Not a huge deal.... just kinda odd.
 
https://www.cbssports.com/collegefo...do-away-with-conferences-having-own-officials

From the arcticle:
Call it "One Nation Under Stripes." Whatever. The concept of conference labels for officials has to be eliminated. The NCAA rules committee can still manage the rulebook, but the officials themselves should be overseen by a national body, instead of the individual conferences.

I had a prominent AD tell me last week that some prominent commissioners are warming to the idea. Get rid of the concept of each conference overseeing "their" officials.

Mike Leach once pounced on the fact a guy from Austin was working a Texas game Texas Tech was involved in. He was fined and reprimanded but he had a darn good point. The less affiliations, the better.

The Pac-12 already endured another embarrassing episode in its sordid officiating history. Not only did the crew get it wrong in the Wisconsin-Arizona State game, they waited two days to offer a vague explanation.

At least when the SEC screws up, it usually owns it promptly and identifies officials who have been reprimanded/penalized.

Too often, though, who got what wrong and why varies from league to league. Why shouldn't officials be identified for their mistakes, the same way players are when they commit a penalty? In an age where transparency is a precious commodity, we need more when it comes to the arbiters of the game, not less.

"I've always been a proponent in nonconference games that you need neutral officials," Benson said. "Next year, how important nonconference games are going to be, you want to remove all doubt about fairness."

There shouldn't be any such thing as an "SEC official" or "Conference USA official." Labels imply something that shouldn't be there.

Pay them all the same wage. Let some national body rate them. Not doing so implies that SEC officials have a much harder job -- that the game means more to its fans, players -- than anyone else.

(To be fair, the Big 12 and Mountain West have an agreement to share officials as do the Big Ten and MAC. "There are some baby steps in that direction," Redding said.)

College football's zebras should be the same as baseball umpires. The more anonymous, the better.
Instead, we have the likes of Gordon Riese basically run out of the game after the Oklahoma-Oregon fiasco. Hey, I know Oklahoma got screwed but does that make it right that a replay official's life was impacted?

We are bordering on a national officiating crisis if only because of the new targeting ejection rule. Targeting interpretation has become an acquired taste. Officials know it when they see it. That's not good enough.
 
Back
Top