Well in case another teams also thinking the same thing?
What other teams have two picks in the same range as ours?
Well in case another teams also thinking the same thing?
The Magic.What other teams have two picks in the same range as ours?
Well let’s say we really like Sidy or GG but didn’t pick him 9th and someone else grabbed him before the Twolves pick.What other teams have two picks in the same range as ours?
Then someone more promising will have slipped down and we rejoice.Well let’s say we really like Sidy or GG but didn’t pick him 9th and someone else grabbed him before the Twolves pick.
Hahaha.. I could totally see OKC going big and grabbing one of them.. especially Sidy.Then someone more promising will have slipped down and we rejoice.
One of those two will be available with the Wolves pick. I will bet you $100.
1. That’s a stretchJazz got zilch to offer them for what they are looking for.
We’re not trading Kessler are you kidding me?1. That’s a stretch
2. Multi-team
3. Kessler more or less straight across
1. It's really not1. That’s a stretch
2. Multi-team
3. Kessler more or less straight across
draft pick.. maybe take a bad contract for a favorable one too.Jazz got zilch to offer them for what they are looking for.
If they are trading a great pick (will probably be able to get Whitmore or a Thompson Twin) they arent going to do it for multiple worse picks. They will want a very highly regarded win now player at a position of need.draft pick.. maybe take a bad contract for a favorable one too.
Directly it doesn't make a ton of sense, but breaking that pick into a couple picks might allow them to get a couple players they like. Could also layer in a KO/Nurkic swap (I wouldn't like that as I think the guy is cooked).1. It's really not
2. Good luck
3. Only if the Jazz pull off getting the #1 pick with their own selection, then hell yeah, go for it.
If the Jazz had a player on Sexton's level at a different position I think they could work something out, but IDK how they do it otherwise.Directly it doesn't make a ton of sense, but breaking that pick into a couple picks might allow them to get a couple players they like. Could also layer in a KO/Nurkic swap (I wouldn't like that as I think the guy is cooked).
I agree we aren't a natural fit but not sure there are a lot of "sellers" out there for what they would want. So you break the asset into a couple future picks because once you drive the pick off the lot it could lose some value.
No its not. Lauri should not be traded. Period.I believe Portland could look to move their pick for a win now piece. I doubt they would take anything less than Lauri, so nothing we probably can get involved in, but that is interesting to think about.
What do you think our Laker pick would be worth if we tried to cash it in for something in this draft? Do you think that pick PLUS the Wolves pick this year together might be worth a 5-8 range pick this year? Thoughts?
At this point you probably have to rank all the future Wolves picks as our best assets, then the latter two Cavs picks, then the Lakers pick, then the 2025 pick then all of Utah's own picks.This year is a strong draft and the Laker's pick is an unknown. However, the Laker pick would make a nice sweetner (wildcard) to add to more concrete a deal involving a player or more defined pick, imo.