It would be a 3 for 3 in this iterationAnd roster spots. Would have to send Eubanks and Svijang (which is fine with me).
It would be a 3 for 3 in this iterationAnd roster spots. Would have to send Eubanks and Svijang (which is fine with me).
Doing the Kings a favor imo.Fox has asked for a trade.
Probably to the Spurs.
Yep instead of just leaving next offseasonDoing the Kings a favor imo.
I also think they are just better off without him. Let Sabonis/Monk run the playmaking responsibilities.Yep instead of just leaving next offseason
Is this a hunch or things you are hearing? Could Utah not get involved in a 3-teamer that sends Collins to Sacramento?John Collins to Sacramento is likely all but dead at this point.
Just a hunch, I guess it depends on what they get back for Fox in a deal.Is this a hunch or things you are hearing? Could Utah not get involved in a 3-teamer that sends Collins to Sacramento?
Is this a hunch or things you are hearing? Could Utah not get involved in a 3-teamer that sends Collins to Sacramento?
It depends on what their goals are. I could see Sacramento getting some 2nd round fodder from SA that they route to us for Collins still. Just depends on if they still plan on trying for the playoffs. Monk/Derozan/Murray/Collins/Sabonis or put Ellis in there and use Collins off the bench. A Fox trade doesn't really make sense for them as a way to bottom out honestly... unless its combined with another deal. I just think it moves to the back burner so less likely they get around to it. Might also add us in to a three team deal.Just a hunch, I guess it depends on what they get back for Fox in a deal.
Nvm it did say two seconds and two firsts but yeah I have the same question, it really depends on which two firsts we are gettingI ain’t saying no to that. Four firsts is pretty nuts for Fox, though, isn’t it? Are they counting the Charlotte pick as a 1st or two 2nds? ‘25 Hawks, ‘25 Chicago, then what? Spurs only have one *extra* 1st to trade after that cuz they ain’t trading that Wolves pick (yet). They do have like 20 2nds, though.
Ima shut up.
Is reading that hard for you. Two firstWhat's in there for us? Two seconds isn't nearly enough for us to give up Collins AND Sexton plus we have no use for someone like Zach Collins & Keldon Johnson, both on very bad contracts.
They get off contracts that don't have positive value as well.I ain’t saying no to that. Four firsts is pretty nuts for Fox, though, isn’t it? Are they counting the Charlotte pick as a 1st or two 2nds? ‘25 Hawks, ‘25 Chicago, then what? Spurs only have one *extra* 1st to trade after that cuz they ain’t trading that Wolves pick (yet). They do have like 20 2nds, though.
Ima shut up.
We have BriceI don't really know what to make of Keldon Johnson as a player. At one point he looked pretty promising. Huerter and Collins expire after next year, so they would make for good expirings in a bigger trade.
You could definitely rehab Huerter into being an asset for a contender who wants a rental shooter. Johnson is probably redundant to Brice as a player, from what I gather looking at stats.