There isn’t a lot of room between Trae Young and strictly being a bench player on a serious team.
That is a vastly different statement than what I said.
There isn’t a lot of room between Trae Young and strictly being a bench player on a serious team.
Let’s make it sweeter/weirderLakers are targeting Sexton. Remove the '27 protections (I equate that to the value of a FRP), this years Laker pick no.17, and give a good contract/player back then I would do it. Maybe give them the 32nd pick.
I don’t think it’s vastly different but okay.That is a vastly different statement than what I said.
It would have to be Rui right? D'Lo would have to opt in.Lakers dont really have anyone I would be interested in outside of Jalen Hood Schifino (laugh away). I doubt they would give up Reaves. I also think they are a 2nd apron team so they cant even aggregate players meaning you would have to take back D'Lo or Rui and not be able to get JHS.
I've become more skeptical of Dillingham as the process has gone on.....but his production as a Freshman was pretty damn insane. I understand being high on him.
Yeah, so it's probably not going to happen becuase Rui has 2 years left.It would have to be Rui right? D'Lo would have to opt in.
Castle falls to 5, the Jazz trade up with the Pistons, offering John Collins, 10, and a future first?
I think he's likely to end up a 2nd-unit guy, giving him a better opportunity to be hidden on defense against backups.
Yeah, and maybe get back a 2nd rounder from Detroit? IF they have any.I'd put protections on that future 1st, but I could see the Jazz making a leap like that for someone they really want. At this stage of the rebuild, the Jazz need something meaningful from this draft.
Yeah, and maybe get back a 2nd rounder from Detroit? IF they have any.
It would be kind of a sneaky way to unload Collins without it looking like an asset dump since you can sell it as buying the 5th pick.
Man if we are selling Sexton let's just stay the **** out of the undersized guard business.If the Jazz trade Sexton I feel a lot more bullish about the long term prospects of drafting Dilly. Keeping both is really just untenable in the long term.
Ehh. Yeah, ~sure. There is just a lot of value to vacuum up in an era where they’re probably undervalued. Electric, instant offense off the bench I would argue is of real value (the stakes are lower in those minutes, the benefits of sustaining offensive production are higher, and the risks of bad defense are lower).Man if we are selling Sexton let's just stay the **** out of the undersized guard business.
Ehh, still. If the idea is that we are selling off all non-Lauri vets who could help us win too many games, we might as well aim for the "optimal" build. If Dillingham is there at 29 it's different, but I'm not taking him top 20.Ehh. Yeah, ~sure. There is just a lot of value to vacuum up in an era where they’re probably undervalued. Electric, instant offense off the bench I would argue is of real value (the stakes are lower in those minutes, the benefits of sustaining offensive production are higher, and the risks of bad defense are lower).
Yeah, that's dumb as hell.Sexton seems like a hot commodity right now.
A writer covering the Raptors threw out this package:
Sexton/29/32 for Brown/19/31