To where, though?
he is carrying the team to championship we cant trade him
To where, though?
Unless you want Utah to tank Al Jefferson is untradeable throughout the season.
/sigh
Let me explain something to you Brown about basketball
When you take as many shots as you score points, that's not good basketball
When you don't play crap for defense, that's not good basketball
When you don't hustle after anything, that's not good basketball
When you routinely don't box out, that's not good basketball
When you get to the line... Well hardly never, that's not good basketball
So, you're saying we should trade him?
I believe the appropriate phrase is "African American hole."
Umm, there is a reason you live in Southern Utah.Man I hate crap like that. First off shouldnt it be something more like Nigerian American or ZImbabwean American? Then only if you have citizenship in both countries. I have as many ties to Africa as most of these people saying they are African American. If you are born here, raised here and have never been to these other places and have no connection...guess what you are not part of that group.
Nothing wrong with being African and if you are then that is cool. Political correctness is crap.
Edit: I can see pretty far from the top of this soapbox. Couple of you need to invest in some rogaine or something...
Umm, there is a reason you live in Southern Utah.
log into the wrong account to bump this(shift);ph omyp yjr etpmh svvpimy yp ni,[ yjodz(djogy)
(It's in code)
And, now you are home where you belong.Um I have lived in Seattle, Denver, LA, Memphis and outside the country. Try again.
And, now you are home where you belong.
Without Al Jefferson this offense would be absolutely awful. There is no other player that can be relied upon to make something happen......
As fans, we've been told that Jefferson was a guy that was going to keep us relevant/competitive while the youth came along their paths of development. We were told that winning -- now and always -- was the best environment in which to develop talent. While I agree with the latter, it's clear that we don't have the ingredients or the cooks to put together a winning formula. This is the reality. That said, I'd argue that it is worse to (a) generate a sentiment of frustration with losing whilst not catering to the youths' development than (b) letting guys develop habits on a losing team. Simple, right? In other words, we are going to lose, so play the youth now; that is where we are; there is no way around it. As it is now, the offense isn't catering to the strengths of the youth, and they are getting marginalized by a system and players that aren't delivering. This is far from what we were told was the Modus Operandi. Tarde Jeffersuck!!!1!1!
I disagree with the premise. Playing the youth now does not mean we are going to lose. It is our vets that are digging us holes too deep to climb out of. It is our vets that are losing games in the last 5 minutes.
And it makes perfect sense as to why we are losing: We are pulling our best defenders of the paint out of the game and putting in our "best" low post scorers in the hopes of out-scoring our opponent. On the road? Seriously?
Let Favors, Kanter, and Burks close out the game and let's see what happens.
So many struggling teams are giving their rookies valuable playing time, including the Kings last night with Isiah Thomas. Yet Favors, Kanter and Burks rarely break the 20 minute mark.