What's new
By:

Andrew Wiggins or Devin Booker

King Cy said:
Wiggins is also a good player on a bad team. IDK if you have seen their record.
Click to expand...

True, but Wiggins isn't taking as many shots as Booker. Booker is quite often taking 20+ shots per game as a primary option.

Wiggins has higher PER, in case you're a believer in that stat.
 
Catchall said:
True, but Wiggins isn't taking as many shots as Booker. Booker is quite often taking 20+ shots per game as a primary option.

Wiggins has higher PER, in case you're a believer in that stat.
Click to expand...

Year stats mean nothing. Booker only came on in the last couple of months.

I'm sure Booker's March PER is higher.
 
Catchall said:
True, but Wiggins isn't taking as many shots as Booker. Booker is quite often taking 20+ shots per game as a primary option.

Wiggins has higher PER, in case you're a believer in that stat.
Click to expand...

Wiggins PER is a whopping 16.44, good for 100th in the keague.
 
Withey has a PER that places him 65th in the league. And Enes Kanter's places him 10th. That tells you what you need to know about PER.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
Withey has a PER that places him 65th in the league. And Enes Kanter's places him 10th. That tells you what you need to know about PER.
Click to expand...

It's a pretty worthless stat tbh. But not as worthless as +/-. I cringe every time Harpring brings it up, which is every other play.
 
I think PER is a good measure to evaluate offensive efficiency/impact in the 20%-30% usage rate range.
 
Booker > Wiggins because Booker can actually drop dimes. I'm not sure Wiggins makes his teammates better and Booker is already showing that ability.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top