No comparison.He would sulk cause he's about as mentally tough as AK47 was.
No comparison.He would sulk cause he's about as mentally tough as AK47 was.
No comparison.
Bro, we just signed Don to a 33M-38M deal with a player option, lol. We pretty obviously give out bad contracts if we're afraid to lose somebody.We can't supermax Rudy. We simply can't sign a non-supermax quality player to a contract that big.
We wouldn't sign Clarkson to $25 million simply because we had no option to replace him with another big signing. You don't sign a bad contract because you are afraid to lose somebody.
To me, this shows a lot about Rudy. He shouldn't say garbage in the media about wanting to win a title then demand more than he is worth. He can't even be the catalyst to get us to the 2nd round. Take a max and move on.
Sent from my SM-G970U using JazzFanz mobile app
So at 30M a year you are good but 38M is too much and would cripple the franchise and you’d rather have him walk?We can't supermax Rudy. We simply can't sign a non-supermax quality player to a contract that big.
We wouldn't sign Clarkson to $25 million simply because we had no option to replace him with another big signing. You don't sign a bad contract because you are afraid to lose somebody.
To me, this shows a lot about Rudy. He shouldn't say garbage in the media about wanting to win a title then demand more than he is worth. He can't even be the catalyst to get us to the 2nd round. Take a max and move on.
Sent from my SM-G970U using JazzFanz mobile app
A penny wise, pound foolish.While I’d take it down to the wire or at least past the game tomorrow... I think I’d rather get it done and overpay a little for the certainty. If it costs you JC later or just replacing Joe’s salary with a minimum guy when it expires then that’s more palatable than risking losing him for nothing. You could move him next year or two for stuff if you need to... similar to what the clips did to Blake. CP getting traded for assets tells you teams will take on players if they feel it’s a short cut to relevance.
All star talent is the hardest thing to find... we can replace Bojan Favs or JC with cheaper parts if we need to and we won’t lose as much as just letting Rudy walk.
And that's apparently where things are.
Nothing about this seems unrealistic. If I had to make a guess myself, this is where the negotiation is. But I have a hard time believing Porter Larsen (not Andy) is the most wired person in all of media to this situation. Loose sources or making it up likely.
I would be curious if they meant a not full super-max at the same value as a normal max for 5 years or if they they meant a regular max, so just 4 years.
Its the $45-50 million when he is 32 and 33 years old which is the issue. Do you even read my posts? I'm fine paying Rudy $38 for 2 years. It's the 3 additional years that will cripple us financially.So at 30M a year you are good but 38M is too much and would cripple the franchise and you’d rather have him walk?
Donovan is 24 and will be going into his prime throughout this deal. He's also a cash cow for marketing off the court.Bro, we just signed Don to a 33M-38M deal with a player option, lol. We pretty obviously give out bad contracts if we're afraid to lose somebody.
I agree.I fear that for Rudy those negotiations are not about the money but giving him appreciation he thinks he deserves. His reaction to allstar snub was telling, he wants to be recognised and I am afraid it may be more important for him that the financial ability of the franchise to build the team. And if he doesnt see himself getting along with Donovan not getting the supermax may be a good pretext to leave without making a big drama about it.