Recently, I called someone the dumbest human being on the planet. I recant that statement and declare you sir thee dumbest human being on the planet. Congratulations.
What would you do as a 17 year old after a psychopath chased you down? I would fear for my life and respond appropriately. The child had every right to beat the adult guys *** in self defense. What was he supposed to do? Push Zimmerman to the ground then wag his middle finger and say "now you leave me alone, mister"? Hell no. You hit the ****er in the head with a rock or whatever it takes to secure your escape from the attacker.
That person is still at it. Dude. You lost this battle. Multiculturalism is here to stay. You're a relic of the past whose value most would rank below that of a street dog. Care to guess what the future holds for people like you? I say a rabid dog is better put down than be allowed to spread their disease.
Most likely a troll.
Nope. I'd say I'm more of a dick.
You lost this battle. Multiculturalism is here to stay.
Those words are synonymous.
And that makes it successful? What are you trying to argue here?
If someone feels free to hold the view of an inevitable race war and the righteousness of cleansing the U.S. of non-whites,
No not at all. A troll implies disingenuity. As in, going for the attention or just to create trouble. That's incorrect. I am perfectly serious. I just happen to be a dick.
However, I feel I'm a justified dick. If someone feels free to hold the view of an inevitable race war and the righteousness of cleansing the U.S. of non-whites, I feel equally entitled to wish them a slow and horrible death.
I was talking about Hayward Supremasict. I merely quoted you to show you that you are about to start an argument with a troll.
Where on earth do you get the idea that a comment like "multiculturalism is a failure" gives you panache in a debate about racism. It simply points out that you are racially motivated in your comments. "Multiculturalism" is a screaming success in most instances. But the people involved have to want to "play nice with others". You just come across as a guy who has a problem with anyone who is a different color. I hope your not packing heat my friend, or you too can end up trying to justify a killing that obviously didn't have to happen. I don't know the facts about what happened and neither do you. But your response speaks volumes. You push all my wrong buttons with the use of the "supremacist" motif, but don't worry i am unarmed.
Uh...What the **** are you talking about? People are upset about the current case because Zimmerman was set free.I like the contrast between this story and the one found in this link.
https://www.kmbc.com/r/30572405/detail.html
Granted the victim didn't die but it was definitely racially motivated. The even more glaring part is that nowhere in the story does it mention the race of the attackers even though the victim told cops the exact race.
National news when black kids light a white kid on fire? Meh, a quick mention. National outrage with prominent political figures leading the lynching? Not for a second. It's only politically beneficial when it's a minority that is put in the victim's seat. "This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy". I wonder if Obama could see this young white kid as his son. He is half white after all.
As all "leaders" are now decrying that crimes like this are horrific regardless of race where were they 3 weeks ago? Frickin' hypocrites only worried about their careers.
Uh...What the **** are you talking about? People are upset about the current case because Zimmerman was set free.
And that kid lived.
Are there any similarities between the two cases?
Yes, other than that.You mean other than they both appear to be racially motivated?