What's new

Burke > Schroeder

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
Not a Burke fan, but not sure how so many think DS is so much better. With all that said. Burke is the better player. I just don't get the attraction for him from Jazz fans here for DS. explain please.


Yep. How the hell is DS this really good pg I keep hearing and ab wants to give DS 10million a year. Lol

this isn't about an "attraction" for Dennis. It's about comparing two players. I'm not sure what has got you so confused.
 
yeah, Burke has a much shorter list of marching orders + is averaging career-low minutes. Prolly should start another thread about how awesome he is.

I'm not taking credit away from the guy as he has hit some pretty nice 3's, but a lot of his shooting % from deep has to be a product of the system right? There's a reason the Spurs continually lead the league in 3 pt %.

The Jazz O has a difficult time getting easy 3's off until it comes to Trey IMO. It seems he gets a disproportionate amount of wide open looks. Is it just me noticing this?
 
Most of you should be embarrassed with the way you have treated Trey up until now. Yall expect someone to come in and shine right away, screw the learning curve. It the "me first" times we live in but still shame on some of your Jazz fans
 
Most of you should be embarrassed with the way you have treated Trey up until now. Yall expect someone to come in and shine right away, screw the learning curve. It the "me first" times we live in but still shame on some of your Jazz fans
You should be embarrassed
 
lol. We all know Dal doesn't need first-hand experience of things before he starts spouting capital-T Truths about them. Usually it's because he 'read a book'... now: he read some stats. Cute. lol.

So how does Dal's initial post in this threat qualify as 'spouting capital-T Truths?' From where I sit, it is not different from any other opinion so confidently expressed here.
 
So how does Dal's initial post in this threat qualify as 'spouting capital-T Truths?' From where I sit, it is not different from any other opinion so confidently expressed here.

why must I limit myself to the first post? Is this one of your fun games?
 
(a) simple, decontextualized statistic
(b) another simple, decontextualized statisitic

TITLE: x > y
 
because NAOSpergers

mmhmm. I like how you're going all-Trump lately: just double-down in the face of your opposition's correctness and then fling out an insult in order to grab the headline. Doesn't bother me, though. Your idiocy has become a JFC staple.
 
Back
Top