What's new

Can Hanlan

homeytennis

Well-Known Member
be sent down to the DLeague and not count against the roster max because of his nationality? I know he could be sent overseas and not counted but the Nuggs did that with a draft pick a couple of years ago that was from Puerto Rico and the Pelicans did it with Pierre Jackson a couple of years ago.
 
Hey I like this Can Hanlan game, let me add to it...

Can Hanlan... bring the ball up the court?


What other 'Can Hanlan's can you come up with?
 
Me too, that's what I thought when I read the thread -- get rid of him. Gee, the guy has been underwhelming and that's an understatement. He has shown absolutely nothing but air balls and consistently bad play. His resume suggested otherwise. What is his problem?
 
Not to just add to the Hanlan bashing, but why on Earth did we draft him if we fully intended to bring Neto over within weeks of doing so? We should have just made our first pick and gotten future assets for 42 and 54. We simply have no room for the dude.
 
Not to just add to the Hanlan bashing, but why on Earth did we draft him if we fully intended to bring Neto over within weeks of doing so? We should have just made our first pick and gotten future assets for 42 and 54. We simply have no room for the dude.

Draft and stash. Just like we did with Neto. Let him get some experience over seas. He is from Canada so we get to keep his rights. Isn't that what we were looking for in the second round? Guys that we can keep there rights but that we don't have to sign to a contract right now?
 
How much ham can a Hanlan can, if a Hanlan can can ham?

Simple. A Hanlan can ham as much ham as a Hanlan could ham if a Hanlan could can ham. Unfortunately, as I understand it, his ham canning skills are worse than his jumpshot.
 
Simple. A Hanlan can ham as much ham as a Hanlan could ham if a Hanlan could can ham. Unfortunately, as I understand it, his ham canning skills are worse than his jumpshot.

He has yet to sign a contract so DL could tell him to go to Europe, Korea, Australia and the Jazz can keep his rights. Whoever on the scouting staff thought he was the 2nd coming ought to be sweating now.
 
Hanlan won't make the roster and we know that. You can send him overseas or drop him into the DL, but the knock on him is that he's already 22 years old. Not old by any means, but I would have hoped he'd have shown a bit more vs. guys that are 2-3 years his junior.

Nothing the FO does is by chance so my guess is that they think he can be a competent scorer off the bench and will truly evalulate him during training camp when matched against our other guards. If he doesn't pan out and we simply have to cut him, keep yourself grounded in the fact they're we're talking about the #42 overall pick of the second round. Take additional comfort in the fact that you can gamble on guys like this when you have four #2's in 2016 and four #2's in 2017. Are all of those eight potential picks going to make the roster? Of course not so don't be disheartened when they don't.
 
Hanlan won't make the roster and we know that. You can send him overseas or drop him into the DL, but the knock on him is that he's already 22 years old. Not old by any means, but I would have hoped he'd have shown a bit more vs. guys that are 2-3 years his junior.

Nothing the FO does is by chance so my guess is that they think he can be a competent scorer off the bench and will truly evalulate him during training camp when matched against our other guards. If he doesn't pan out and we simply have to cut him, keep yourself grounded in the fact they're we're talking about the #42 overall pick of the second round. Take additional comfort in the fact that you can gamble on guys like this when you have four #2's in 2016 and four #2's in 2017. Are all of those eight potential picks going to make the roster? Of course not so don't be disheartened when they don't.

That all sounds like bologna to me (HAM JOKE ALERT).

The two players drafted immediately following deli-meat 'select cuts' were intriguing prospects in my mind. Joseph Young #43 and Andrew Harrison #44. They have both been playing really well in the D-League so far and making for competition in the locker room for minutes on their respective teams. I figure that if you are drafting at #42 you are looking to grab a player with specific 'nba skills' (like rebounding in the case of Millsap) OR you are trying to pick up a player who can create competition at a spot. Joseph Young and Andrew Harrison may have been no-goes because we have Bryce Cotton (similar to Joseph Young) and Neto (a point guard from a previous draft) both in camp. If so, why grab a 6th point. That would be good thinking if we didn't sign a 6th Ham-balaya. But really since we were going for a combo guard, early signs show that Mighty Joe Young may have been the better choice here.

Shaking my ham in disapproval. BRA!
 
Hanlan won't make the roster and we know that. You can send him overseas or drop him into the DL, but the knock on him is that he's already 22 years old. Not old by any means, but I would have hoped he'd have shown a bit more vs. guys that are 2-3 years his junior.

Nothing the FO does is by chance so my guess is that they think he can be a competent scorer off the bench and will truly evalulate him during training camp when matched against our other guards. If he doesn't pan out and we simply have to cut him, keep yourself grounded in the fact they're we're talking about the #42 overall pick of the second round. Take additional comfort in the fact that you can gamble on guys like this when you have four #2's in 2016 and four #2's in 2017. Are all of those eight potential picks going to make the roster? Of course not so don't be disheartened when they don't.

That all sounds like bologna to me (HAM JOKE ALERT).

The two players drafted immediately following deli-meat 'select cuts' were intriguing prospects in my mind. Joseph Young #43 and Andrew Harrison #44. They have both been playing really well in the D-League so far and making for competition in the locker room for minutes on their respective teams. I figure that if you are drafting at #42 you are looking to grab a player with specific 'nba skills' (like rebounding in the case of Millsap) OR you are trying to pick up a player who can create competition at a spot. Joseph Young and Andrew Harrison may have been no-goes because we have Bryce Cotton (similar to Joseph Young) and Neto (a point guard from a previous draft) both in camp. If so, why grab a 6th point? Was someone just hungry for a ham sandwich on draft night? We drafted a combo guard which creates competition at that spot. Since we were going for a combo guard, early signs show that Mighty Joe Young may have been a better choice than Ham-balaya.

Shaking my ham in premature disapproval. BRA!
 
That all sounds like bologna to me (HAM JOKE ALERT).

The two players drafted immediately following deli-meat 'select cuts' were intriguing prospects in my mind. Joseph Young #43 and Andrew Harrison #44. They have both been playing really well in the D-League so far and making for competition in the locker room for minutes on their respective teams. I figure that if you are drafting at #42 you are looking to grab a player with specific 'nba skills' (like rebounding in the case of Millsap) OR you are trying to pick up a player who can create competition at a spot. Joseph Young and Andrew Harrison may have been no-goes because we have Bryce Cotton (similar to Joseph Young) and Neto (a point guard from a previous draft) both in camp. If so, why grab a 6th point? Was someone just hungry for a ham sandwich on draft night? We drafted a combo guard which creates competition at that spot. Since we were going for a combo guard, early signs show that Mighty Joe Young may have been a better choice than Ham-balaya.

Shaking my ham in premature disapproval. BRA!

To me what makes this pick so disappointing is that Kyle Korver, Mo Williams, Boozer, Okur and Paul Millsap were drafted in the 2nd round. Maybe the guy will get his stuff together by training camp but I kind of doubt it.
 
That all sounds like bologna to me (HAM JOKE ALERT).

The two players drafted immediately following deli-meat 'select cuts' were intriguing prospects in my mind. Joseph Young #43 and Andrew Harrison #44. They have both been playing really well in the D-League so far and making for competition in the locker room for minutes on their respective teams. I figure that if you are drafting at #42 you are looking to grab a player with specific 'nba skills' (like rebounding in the case of Millsap) OR you are trying to pick up a player who can create competition at a spot. Joseph Young and Andrew Harrison may have been no-goes because we have Bryce Cotton (similar to Joseph Young) and Neto (a point guard from a previous draft) both in camp. If so, why grab a 6th point? Was someone just hungry for a ham sandwich on draft night? We drafted a combo guard which creates competition at that spot. Since we were going for a combo guard, early signs show that Mighty Joe Young may have been a better choice than Ham-balaya.

Shaking my ham in premature disapproval. BRA!

Guess the Han, or is it the Ham, has been officially canned.
 
He has yet to sign a contract so DL could tell him to go to Europe, Korea, Australia and the Jazz can keep his rights. Whoever on the scouting staff thought he was the 2nd coming ought to be sweating now.

pretty sure we can't send him overseas unless he agrees. but if wanted to stay and play in the NBA (and plenty of teams apparently liked him) and we don't offer him a contract (or don't have the roster space to offer him one) he would be free to sign anywhere.
 
Me too, that's what I thought when I read the thread -- get rid of him. Gee, the guy has been underwhelming and that's an understatement. He has shown absolutely nothing but air balls and consistently bad play. His resume suggested otherwise. What is his problem?

He probably just hates you.
 
Back
Top