What's new
By:

Charlottesville

JustTheTip said:
Alex Jones is a leader of the right wing? Please.

Jones is a voice for the extreme hard right, a vocal minority.

Is it so hard for you to be intellectually honest?
Click to expand...

Please tell babe Alex Jones is in the extreme minority. He said very recently that more people listen to and believe Alex Jones than CNN.
 
For the life of me, I'll never understand these white supremacists. Or any other kind. They're morons that the vast majority of people don't agree with.

Honestly, don't give them the time of day. Don't protest them, don't put them on the news, don't give them any attention. Their voice will fade. People are just playing into their hands. By treating them like they're a big deal, you're turning them into one. If you fight them, kill them, in their eyes you make their cause worth fighting.

Just ignore them. They're not worth anybody's time.
 
Bulletproof said:
Please tell babe Alex Jones is in the extreme minority. He said very recently that more people listen to and believe Alex Jones than CNN.
Click to expand...

Again, by talking about Jones and his ilk, people make him more popular. He's getting what he wants. Just ignore him.

/this isn't directed at you. Just an in general post.
 
time to take down bigotted homophobic statues.

lets start with martin luther king's homophobic statues.

[video=youtube_share;Wbr-K63iEgM]https://youtu.be/Wbr-K63iEgM


just kidding.

but first they start with taking down statue of people who owned slaves. then they will say the framers of the constituion owned slaves!

so we should amend the whole constitution, and have some progressive new socialist 25 point plan like all good socialist have had in the past.


their will be a big great civil war!
 
I hate racism in any form but isn't this a free country where anyone can voice their opinion? I never think violence is an answer but for every point isn't there and antithesis?
 
Crocodile Dante said:
I hate racism in any form but isn't this a free country where anyone can voice their opinion? I never think violence is an answer but for every point isn't there and antithesis?
Click to expand...

Freedom isn't freedom from repercussions. Nor does that freedom allow them to infringe on the freedom of others. There was a protest of questionable ideals; and a counter protest to try to show that there's a lot of people that believe those ideals are questionable. You had two groups of people absolutely afraid of what they perceive as the other's message.

And from that stemmed violence, assault, terrorism and murder.
 
Harambe said:
Freedom isn't freedom from repercussions. Nor does that freedom allow them to infringe on the freedom of others. There was a protest of questionable ideals; and a counter protest to try to show that there's a lot of people that believe those ideals are questionable. You had two groups of people absolutely afraid of what they perceive as the other's message.

And from that stemmed violence, assault, terrorism and murder.
Click to expand...

There should be limits on free speech, hate speech for example. The right wing has been trying to change the racial discrimination act here to allow right wing radio personalities and others to publish and spout all sorts of racist nonsense without repercussions. An extraordinary amount of sitting time in the nations parliament has been dedicated to this.
 
Harambe said:
Freedom isn't freedom from repercussions. Nor does that freedom allow them to infringe on the freedom of others. There was a protest of questionable ideals; and a counter protest to try to show that there's a lot of people that believe those ideals are questionable. You had two groups of people absolutely afraid of what they perceive as the other's message.

And from that stemmed violence, assault, terrorism and murder.
Click to expand...

i know i might be the worse when it comes to English.

but you got freedom and liberty confused!
 
Rubashov said:
There should be limits on free speech, hate speech for example.
Click to expand...

whoo the foook decides what hate speech is!

the government?

the number 1 cause of homicde.

it is called democide.


the problem with this hate speech stupidity. is that it inst universal. if i shoot you with a gun. or your neighbor or some random guy the hurt is universal.
but if i say look at a filthy jew to a muslim, or i say look at a filthy jew to another jew. it might hurt 1 and might not hurt the other. it isn't universal! therefore it cannot be a law. unless you are a socialist or tyranical govenrment you want those laws.


sometimes hatespeech laws get you convicted for no reason. for example a dutch politician said "mohamed the profit married a 6 year old girl, now adays we call tha pedophilia" guess what they consider the truth hate speech!

or what is happening to the google employee!


so if you want your hat e speech law. take your hate speech law and shove it where the sun don't shine.

my mouth is my property so i have control over it. not you or the government 50.00000000000000% of the people elect!
 
Rubashov said:
There should be limits on free speech, hate speech for example. The right wing has been trying to change the racial discrimination act here to allow right wing radio personalities and others to publish and spout all sorts of racist nonsense without repercussions. An extraordinary amount of sitting time in the nations parliament has been dedicated to this.
Click to expand...

Nah you can't put limits on free speech.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top