Sexual Favors
Well-Known Member
Language barrier. 21. No college. Ty Corbin as coach.
Corbin hates Kanter?
- Thread starter Mickie_JameS
- Start date
Language barrier. 21. No college. Ty Corbin as coach.
Let me get this straight: you believe a player who has played almost three years of organized, professional basketball has not had enough time to learn basketball?
Crawlnstall
Well-Known Member
I think Corbin doesn't trust Kanter, not neccesarily hates him. Corbin is coaching for his life/next coaching gig right now. Kanter is still bad on defense but he isn't the biggest issue. Our TEAM defense is just awful and Kanter gets exposed because our wings can't keep up.
Kanter's struggles come to coaching imo. Kanter has a lot of physical tools to be a solid player but he needs to be coached. Corbin would rather play a vet than knows a little more than Kanter rather than let him learn and grow on the court.
It's so sad that a #3 pick we got from the D-Wil trade is being so under utilized. With the season being a waste you would think Corbin would get the hint from the FO that his job would be safer if he developed youth while losing, instead of playing vets and still losing
Kanter's struggles come to coaching imo. Kanter has a lot of physical tools to be a solid player but he needs to be coached. Corbin would rather play a vet than knows a little more than Kanter rather than let him learn and grow on the court.
It's so sad that a #3 pick we got from the D-Wil trade is being so under utilized. With the season being a waste you would think Corbin would get the hint from the FO that his job would be safer if he developed youth while losing, instead of playing vets and still losing
I have no clue what you're talking about with "leakers" coming inside and forcing a rotation. Do you have a specific setup in mind to help me understand what you're getting at?
Let me get this straight: you feel a coach that has spent his entire life in basketball has not had enough time to learn basketball?
Players can, and often do, increase their skills and BBIQ over time. Same with coaches.
For example. Kanter does not pull the ball down so low anymore on an offensive rebound. He learned and increased his knowledge. Gasp
That's a fundamental skill, not BBIQ. SMH
Point stands. Or are you seriously saying that after 3 years Kanter has all the BBIQ he is going to acquire? If so does that stance hold true for Corbin?
Stahp! You're talking about basketball knowledge and basketball fundamentals, not BBIQ.
Why would a coach need BBIQ? This makes no sense.
Stahp. Kanter will improve all three over time.
As Kanter continues to see time he will improve his awareness of what is going on around him. He will read offesnes and defenses better. He will hone skills and learn when to do and not do something.
I miss the days when you actually believed anything you typed.
It depnds
Probably true. Some players continue to learn over their careers. Others lack the desire to learn or the aptitude. Some think they know enough or just rely on their athleticism and don't think they need to learn any more. Others sign their big payday and lose their drive to improve.
Kanter seems to be still on the steep part of the learning curve, so there is a good amount of hope, in my opinion.
Probably true. Some players continue to learn over their careers. Others lack the desire to learn or the aptitude. Some think they know enough or just rely on their athleticism and don't think they need to learn any more. Others sign their big payday and lose their drive to improve.
Kanter seems to be still on the steep part of the learning curve, so there is a good amount of hope, in my opinion.
That's cute after you showed you don't know wtf you're talking about and don't understand the simplest basketball concepts, so you were arguing against something you think someone is saying but really you're just confused/undereducated.
Stoked the giant brick wall strikes again.
Clearly. Thanks.
Nah, there was never a real conversation going. I have no interest.
Sexual Favors
Well-Known Member
Increasing his fundamentals has a direct correlation to increased in knowledge, which points to his BBIQ being increased because his clearly now understanding something he didn't before and is implementing it.
Playing time is like sudoku for players, it helps them to better understand the patterns of the game.
Kanter picked up Al's footwork exceptionally fast. If he didn't have BBIQ, he'd likely be able to learn the moves, but wouldn't do them at precisely the right time to be effective. That part comes from his own in-the-moment intelligence.
Sexual Favors
Well-Known Member
@marvinWilliams
Don't know if this is Marvin Williams' real twitter, but the article says some interesting things about Enes Kanter and Marvin Williams...
Don't know if this is Marvin Williams' real twitter, but the article says some interesting things about Enes Kanter and Marvin Williams...
More power to you for trying to climb that hill.
Muscle memory is knowledge, I suppose, but it's not bbiq.
Fixed.
Al Jefferson has great fundamentals but poor bbiq. If you're arguing that Kanter growing to Jefferson's level of fundamentals will make him Jefferson's bbiq equal then that's a pretty damning indictment of Kanter.
BBIQ is about reacting to the changing atmosphere around you and predicting where the offensive or defensive holes are going to be. That requires understanding where all 10 men on the court are and will be, and not spinning like a ballerina in the post and figuring out how to shoot around the double team with your great fundamentals.
