I think Kuz has been in the Team USA program, even if he didn't make the final cut. I suspect they've crossed paths there.There isn’t really any ties with them either that I can think of either that’s what makes it interesting. It’s not like it’s friends catching up after a game.
Basketball reference says he is the worst offensive rating on our team besides bolmaro. His defense is a higher but his net rating would still be -23, which is one of the worst on the team. Most stats are showing he sucks and he definitely looks like he sucks when pretty much anyone watches him. His effort is very low and his shooting is off. Players regularly go after him on defense. His VORP, BPM, WS, WS/48, TS%, PER, and pretty much every other important stat show he is the worst on our team next to Bolmaro who isnt really playing, just like he shouldnt be. I am not sure why you are clining to this one stat. Simone isnt great but he is pretty much better at every major stat including these. Our team would be better with him taking Gay's minutes. That isnt even getting to the morale part of the team. Its hard to play with a vet who is really lazy on the court and doesnt seem to care.His net rating suggest otherwise.
Why would Kuz and Lauri be guarding guards? Neither of them would play guard. Kuz would play PF. Maybe Lauri and him switch around depending on matchups and changing up the pace.I do. If we trade for Kuzma we gotta trade away JC. Otherwise its Kuzma and JC on wings and Lauri loses his free role and has to play 4.
Cant have Kuzma play off ball away from Conley. He has to play wing for sure. As does JC.
I dont know how Kuzma + Lauri wings would work though. My guess is great offensively, but defending true guards would become an issue.
While he's still behind Gobert in almost every aspect of the game, it feels like he's really learning from him on a daily basis. Guess maybe in a way he does, since we have sooo much video of Rudy doing his thing, and also coaches who know what it took Rudy to go from where he was as a rookie to the all star he became.I dont know if I have ever made a gamethread comment relating to screen setting before but man Kessler did a great job of setting screens for shooters tonight. Very impressive. He was pretty awesome in every aspect of his role. Which is very typical.
I LOVE that he played 32 minutes tonight. That is right about how many I think he should play every night for a long time now.
Not both, but one of them would have to. I thought I already pointed out why.Why would Kuz and Lauri be guarding guards? Neither of them would play guard. Kuz would play PF. Maybe Lauri and him switch around depending on matchups and changing up the pace.
I wouldn't call Collins an "off ball player". He wants more touches since he's been sitting in the corner lately (which, in the modern NBA, is what a 4 does if they can shoot at all). I presume he wants the screener/roller role in a PnR centric offense. Collins is a play finisher, like Lauri.Not both, but one of them would have to. I thought I already pointed out why.
You think Kuzma would be happy to play PF? I cannot remember him not playing at wing and he is getting 60 touches this year (JC numbers). I think you would have to have both Lauri and Kuzma next to Conley, and putting either one at 4 would be a waste. We already know Lauri withered away at 4 in Chicago.
Putting players in best positions for them is key for them to succeed. Kuzma is his best version at wing, and so is Markkanen. Thats one of the reasons I like Collins way more. He plays 4, and has always done so. He is an off ball player while Kuzma needs the ball in his hands a lot.
Neither of them are playing guard or guarding guards. Both of them play pf this year plenty and do it well. Kuzma starts at PF, I don't know the percentage he plays there since I don't watch many wizards games. Lauri switches to PF plenty with our team.Not both, but one of them would have to. I thought I already pointed out why.
You think Kuzma would be happy to play PF? I cannot remember him not playing at wing and he is getting 60 touches this year (JC numbers). I think you would have to have both Lauri and Kuzma next to Conley, and putting either one at 4 would be a waste. We already know Lauri withered away at 4 in Chicago.
Putting players in best positions for them is key for them to succeed. Kuzma is his best version at wing, and so is Markkanen. Thats one of the reasons I like Collins way more. He plays 4, and has always done so. He is an off ball player while Kuzma needs the ball in his hands a lot.
It's crazy to me people are worried about a player being too similar to Lauri. I would gladly take 2 Lauri's in our starting lineup. **** it give me a starting lineup of 5 Lauri's. Backups can give us different lineups.
Oh so you suddenly transform Collins to a different player he is? Man he has ALWAYS been off ball playing PF and seemingly happy to play that way. Only place he has ever spoken out is in team meetings, one of which was leaked last year to the press. He isn't whining his way out of Atlanta... they are trying to dump his salary to stay under luxury tax since he doesnt fit to what they do anymore and cant produce to justify his salary in their crappy (guard iso) "system".I wouldn't call Collins an "off ball player". He wants more touches since he's been sitting in the corner lately (which, in the modern NBA, is what a 4 does if they can shoot at all). I presume he wants the screener/roller role in a PnR centric offense. Collins is a play finisher, like Lauri.
On the Jazz, bringing him into the starting lineup would push Markkanen into the spacer role, since Lauri is clearly the better shooter.
IMO these two overlap way too much. If we keep Lauri in his freelancing role, Collins needs to space, aaand he's right back in the same situation he wanted to escape in Atlanta. He won't like that.
He has a different "net rating" in mind than you do. I wouldn't take the BR's net rating too seriously, in any case, but it's largely based on individual stats. He's referring to net rating in terms of +/- (how the team performs with him on the floor), which is arguably the most important stat (though vulnerable to small sample size, teammate effects, opponent lineup rotations). Here Gay is blowing everyone away. The Jazz have scored nearly 15 points more than the opponent/100 possessions with Gay on the floor. The next closest rotation player is Markkanen, with the Jazz outscoring opponents with him on the floor by 5 points/100 possessions. The Jazz are 22 points worse/100 possessions than the opponent when Simone is on the floor.Basketball reference says he is the worst offensive rating on our team besides bolmaro. His defense is a higher but his net rating would still be -23, which is one of the worst on the team. Most stats are showing he sucks and he definitely looks like he sucks when pretty much anyone watches him. His effort is very low and his shooting is off. Players regularly go after him on defense. His VORP, BPM, WS, WS/48, TS%, PER, and pretty much every other important stat show he is the worst on our team next to Bolmaro who isnt really playing, just like he shouldnt be. I am not sure why you are clining to this one stat. Simone isnt great but he is pretty much better at every major stat including these. Our team would be better with him taking Gay's minutes. That isnt even getting to the morale part of the team. Its hard to play with a vet who is really lazy on the court and doesnt seem to care.
I only assume we are playing him because we gave him some guarantee about minutes when he signed and are trying to keep his minutes going to help with a trade later or just general respect for a vet on the team to help with our image to other players and agents.
I do. If we trade for Kuzma we gotta trade away JC. Otherwise its Kuzma and JC on wings and Lauri loses his free role and has to play 4.
Cant have Kuzma play off ball away from Conley. He has to play wing for sure. As does JC.
I dont know how Kuzma + Lauri wings would work though. My guess is great offensively, but defending true guards would become an issue.
He has a different "net rating" in mind than you do. I wouldn't take the BR's net rating too seriously, in any case, but it's largely based on individual stats. He's referring to net rating in terms of +/- (how the team performs with him on the floor), which is arguably the most important stat (though vulnerable to small sample size, teammate effects, opponent lineup rotations). Here Gay is blowing everyone away. The Jazz have scored nearly 15 points more than the opponent/100 possessions with Gay on the floor. The next closest rotation player is Markkanen, with the Jazz outscoring opponents with him on the floor by 5 points/100 possessions. The Jazz are 22 points worse/100 possessions than the opponent when Simone is on the floor.
Now there's no guarantee that these numbers will hold in the future. In fact, I think they're unlikely to do so. But there's also no denying that the Jazz have done well with Gay on the floor this year, so far.
(By the way, those who attribute this stat to teammate effects, as I've seen some try to do, are still not accounting for the facts that Gay is both higher than all other teammates and also considerably higher. It doesn't seem logical to argue that your teammates are carrying you if you end up way higher than any of them.)
Exactly what Jim Boylen thought before he put Lauri to 4 where he started withering away.
Exactly what Jim Boylen thought before he put Lauri to 4 where he started withering away.