What's new

Derrick Favors being on the bench didn't lose us this game, our starting 1-3 did.

Burks had every reason not to sag in on Jennings on the Bucks' last possession in regulation. They needed a three to tie, yet he still gave them airspace. Millsap and Kanter had done a great job thus far, and at worst they would have given up 2 points. Not 3.

Yes the line up with Sap and Kanter worked, but it worked just thanks to Enes. He scored 16 points on 9 shots and grapped 8 boards in 20 minutes of the second half.... Millsap is not playing team-ball, Kanter often was open and settled for an open Jumper, but Millsap contnued tu run into Sanders... most of his shot decision were horrible...
To go with Kanter and Sap was not bad, but i think that the Favors/Kanter line up would have won this one...
 
Yes the line up with Sap and Kanter worked, but it worked just thanks to Enes. He scored 16 points on 9 shots and grapped 8 boards in 20 minutes of the second half.... Millsap is not playing team-ball, Kanter often was open and settled for an open Jumper, but Millsap contnued tu run into Sanders... most of his shot decision were horrible...
To go with Kanter and Sap was not bad, but i think that the Favors/Kanter line up would have won this one...

Enes killed it, and Sap went to the FT line SEVERAL times when we couldn't buy any buckets. Both rebounded well, both defended well. Any complaints that either of them get are completely unsubstantiated, apart from Sap choking at the line, and his hilarious 3 point attempt.
 
Favors racked up 23&15 through 3-quarters just by crashing the boards, taking high-percentage shots when he got the ball and then flashing to open areas and using his athletic abilities to finish. It was absurd and ludicrous he wasn't re-inserted into the game at the 7-min mark of the 4th-quarter when he was clearly the Jazz's best player up until that point and the Jazz could've used his length and defensive presence when Monta Ellis was getting to the rim late in the game on back-door cuts. Favors can come into a game and allow a team to keep their flow because unlike some people, he doesn't need or dominate the ball to make a positive impact. The only bad thing about Favors' tonight was he had to play on the court at the same time Earl Watson/Randy Foye/Marvin Williams decided to take their biggest dump of the season at the Bradley Center.

Down the stretch Ty kept Kanter, in who had a terrific bounce-back performance in the 2nd-half after a rough first-half, and opted for Millsap's experience and Millsap shot 2-6 in OT and missed the FT with 14.9 seconds left in regulation that could've given Utah a 4-point lead. So we opted for experience over not just youth but on-court production and lost again...all in a days work for the 2012-13 Jazz.

I couldn't care less that the Jazz lost, but I do feel bad for Favors. If the kid plays that hard and that well for 3-quarters and can't see the court for the final 17 minutes of the game, hard to see how he'll have much of a future unless the Jazz let both Millsap&Jefferson walk (which I don't think is likely). It's a good thing the new CBA will give Utah more ability to hang onto their young players because if Favors really wants to maximize his potential as a player there would be alot of teams he'd be better off on - but of course that's assuming the Jazz even want him in their long-term plans.
 
Burks had every reason not to sag in on Jennings on the Bucks' last possession in regulation. They needed a three to tie, yet he still gave them airspace. Millsap and Kanter had done a great job thus far, and at worst they would have given up 2 points. Not 3.

Burks hand was right in jennings face.... jennings made a tough shot, he didn't give "airspace".
 
Burks hand was right in jennings face.... jennings made a tough shot, he didn't give "airspace".

He gave airspace. He should be forcing him to drive around him at all cost. He also didn't have his hand up until Jennings already started the process of his shot.
 
Ugh, these Corbin apologists... praise him for "sticking with the lineup that got us back" the ONE time that Corbin actually does do that, and ignore it the dozens of times that he doesn't.
 
Favors racked up 23&15 through 3-quarters just by crashing the boards, taking high-percentage shots when he got the ball and then flashing to open areas and using his athletic abilities to finish. It was absurd and ludicrous he wasn't re-inserted into the game at the 7-min mark of the 4th-quarter when he was clearly the Jazz's best player up until that point and the Jazz could've used his length and defensive presence when Monta Ellis was getting to the rim late in the game on back-door cuts. Favors can come into a game and allow a team to keep their flow because unlike some people, he doesn't need or dominate the ball to make a positive impact. The only bad thing about Favors' tonight was he had to play on the court at the same time Earl Watson/Randy Foye/Marvin Williams decided to take their biggest dump of the season at the Bradley Center.

Down the stretch Ty kept Kanter, in who had a terrific bounce-back performance in the 2nd-half after a rough first-half, and opted for Millsap's experience and Millsap shot 2-6 in OT and missed the FT with 14.9 seconds left in regulation that could've given Utah a 4-point lead. So we opted for experience over not just youth but on-court production and lost again...all in a days work for the 2012-13 Jazz.

I couldn't care less that the Jazz lost, but I do feel bad for Favors. If the kid plays that hard and that well for 3-quarters and can't see the court for the final 17 minutes of the game, hard to see how he'll have much of a future unless the Jazz let both Millsap&Jefferson walk (which I don't think is likely). It's a good thing the new CBA will give Utah more ability to hang onto their young players because if Favors really wants to maximize his potential as a player there would be alot of teams he'd be better off on - but of course that's assuming the Jazz even want him in their long-term plans.

Read this cyrone torbin and sandy braille..... then after you read it, punch yourselves in the face and try to stop being so stupid.
 
He gave airspace. He should be forcing him to drive around him at all cost. He also didn't have his hand up until Jennings already started the process of his shot.

Well you put me in my place..... now try to pick apart the logic in vslice post
 
Favors racked up 23&15 through 3-quarters just by crashing the boards, taking high-percentage shots when he got the ball and then flashing to open areas and using his athletic abilities to finish. It was absurd and ludicrous he wasn't re-inserted into the game at the 7-min mark of the 4th-quarter when he was clearly the Jazz's best player up until that point and the Jazz could've used his length and defensive presence when Monta Ellis was getting to the rim late in the game on back-door cuts. Favors can come into a game and allow a team to keep their flow because unlike some people, he doesn't need or dominate the ball to make a positive impact. The only bad thing about Favors' tonight was he had to play on the court at the same time Earl Watson/Randy Foye/Marvin Williams decided to take their biggest dump of the season at the Bradley Center.

Down the stretch Ty kept Kanter, in who had a terrific bounce-back performance in the 2nd-half after a rough first-half, and opted for Millsap's experience and Millsap shot 2-6 in OT and missed the FT with 14.9 seconds left in regulation that could've given Utah a 4-point lead. So we opted for experience over not just youth but on-court production and lost again...all in a days work for the 2012-13 Jazz.

I couldn't care less that the Jazz lost, but I do feel bad for Favors. If the kid plays that hard and that well for 3-quarters and can't see the court for the final 17 minutes of the game, hard to see how he'll have much of a future unless the Jazz let both Millsap&Jefferson walk (which I don't think is likely). It's a good thing the new CBA will give Utah more ability to hang onto their young players because if Favors really wants to maximize his potential as a player there would be alot of teams he'd be better off on - but of course that's assuming the Jazz even want him in their long-term plans.



Agree to disagree. If a lineup works, you stick with it. That is my opinion. I always hate it when Al checks in regardless of Favors's and Kanter's performance, and I hate it now as well.

Also, your stat of Millsap shooting 2-6 doesn't give us the whole story. How about mentioning how many fouls he drew? Because that it what really kept us close towards the end of regulation. Also, the backdoor cuts and layups were much more prominent towards the mid-makr of the 4th, not the end. They figured it out, and defended very so well that even the Bucks commentators were exclaiming how solid Utah's defense was.
 
Well you put me in my place..... now try to pick apart the logic in vslice post

Can't, it makes perfect sense. I was hoping Corbin would take out Millsap around hte 6 minute mark, but he didn't. Then Millsap started to actually play well offensively and was scoring on Ilyasova and getting to the ft line. I've already cited Sap's missed clutch FT's as the biggest reason for our loss, but without Millsap we may not even be getting to the line and scoring at all. It was a really tough choice on Corbin's part and one I disagreed with, but it worked from a coaching standpoint in that the players he put forth were in an opportunity to win the game (a damn good one), they just couldn't finish the simple FT's (Carroll and Sap.
 
This Sandy Braille has got to be one of the most pig-headed retards in Jazzfanz history. He refuses to budge an inch and consider that maybe what he's saying isn't totally correct, no matter how many times you explain it to him. Favors gives us something neither Millsap or Kanter can. A guy who can protect the rim. And we needed that. It just doesn't make sense to leave a guy who's having a career night and adds so many intangibles on the bench in a close game. But you know what they say, it takes one retard to know another. So this retard is rallying to the defense of the retardation of his buddy.
 
It seems that ty has no problem tinkering with a lineup if it involves bringing jeffy back into the game.... but if it involves bringing a young player who is having the best game of his life back into the game..... better not tinker with it

This post is the winner.

Thats where this defending Ty Corbin b.s. is put to rest.

Its complete ******** what Corbin is doing.
 
So wait, our starting 1-3 lost the game, and yet we're supposed to believe that Favors had a hand in how bad the unit played? Are you ****ing high?
 
We have the worst starting backcourt in NBA history.

Williams-Foye-Watson.

I'm serious. Name me a worse starting backcourt.
 
Hard to imagine what a guy who got 23/15 in 3 quarters would have helped with.

It was not bad coaching, the problem is that Corbin never did stuff like this to a bench player. Al Jefferson comes everytime in to the game, no matter how bad he is playing . But IF we look just on this game, it was not a bad decision...

Favors just got one board in the 3rd and scored 6 points out of 5 shots... Millsap and Kanter brought us back, after that 18-4 stretch. The mistake on Corbin was, not to bench Millsap as he get tired and started sucking. Kanter was ****ing amazing and clutch like BIG-AL is normally.
 
It was not bad coaching, the problem is that Corbin never did stuff like this to a bench player. Al Jefferson comes everytime in to the game, no matter how bad he is playing . But IF we look just on this game, it was not a bad decision...

Favors just got one board in the 3rd and scored 6 points out of 5 shots... Millsap and Kanter brought us back, after that 18-4 stretch. The mistake on Corbin was, not to bench Millsap as he get tired and started sucking. Kanter was ****ing amazing and clutch like BIG-AL is normally.

al jefferson bu yazdıklarını görse sana iman edip seni Tanrı beller

- i can't figure it out how can you love jefferpapa that much
 
Back
Top