LOL .. you've been misinformed.
Disturbing abortion trend?(anecdotal)
- Thread starter ♪alt13
- Start date
LOL .. you've been misinformed.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
I was inferring. You yourself do plenty to produce that inference.
Not true though.. I made plenty of noise when I complained about asian condoms a few years back...
NAOS
Well-Known Member
I thought you were ****ing things you bought in the produce isle. True.
LOL .. nah, it was a lot of frustration... I was put in some 'tight' situation.
I now learn to pack my own just in case.
All this time I thought you said you were a eunuch so give him a little credit.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
wwjd?
No idea.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
don't feign ignorance, pls. You know the decrees.
By the way, apparently they've already gone through 450,000 condoms in the Olympic Village in Rio
that app Tinder is doing a good business too
that app Tinder is doing a good business too
green
Well-Known Member
So, how do you protect the man in all this? In Utah (using some dumb calculator found on google) a guy making $55,000 would have to pay almost $500 a month for one kid. $500 a month is $6,000 a year or $108,000 over the life of the kid.
Now, that's not a ton of money, but that is a ton of money.
I can see why a guy would encourage an abortion (not that I agree with it).
So, if a woman gets to choose yay or nay without input from the man, shouldn't there be a protection for a man?
Maybe a legal document signed by the man before the third trimester (or the latest date that a woman can have an abortion minus X amount of days so she can make her decision) where the man states that he wants nothing to do with the child and will have no contact with the child and by doing so absolves himself of any responsibility (financial or otherwise) of the child.
Yes? No?
Now, that's not a ton of money, but that is a ton of money.
I can see why a guy would encourage an abortion (not that I agree with it).
So, if a woman gets to choose yay or nay without input from the man, shouldn't there be a protection for a man?
Maybe a legal document signed by the man before the third trimester (or the latest date that a woman can have an abortion minus X amount of days so she can make her decision) where the man states that he wants nothing to do with the child and will have no contact with the child and by doing so absolves himself of any responsibility (financial or otherwise) of the child.
Yes? No?
You are one messed up person. Let us review the nature of this pregnancy thing. The woman goes through hell, destroys her body in the process, further destroys her body breast feeding an staying up all night with the child, can have severe emotional issues both during the pregnancy an after, an you want to sit here telling me a dude who could not keep his dick in his pants should have rights?
What has this world come to? A world without accountability that is what it is.
green
Well-Known Member
This is a very adult conversation that probably isn't best served on a message board. I'll give it another shot.
Boris, let's see if I understand where you are coming from.
If I understand correctly, you think that every pregnancy is the man's fault because, quote: "he couldn't keep his dick in his pants". Correct?
And because the man is 100% to be blamed for every pregnancy, if he chose not to want to be a part of the child's life, he would be participating in a world that is failing because there is no accountability, correct?
How's that different than a woman who wants an abortion?
Boris, let's see if I understand where you are coming from.
If I understand correctly, you think that every pregnancy is the man's fault because, quote: "he couldn't keep his dick in his pants". Correct?
And because the man is 100% to be blamed for every pregnancy, if he chose not to want to be a part of the child's life, he would be participating in a world that is failing because there is no accountability, correct?
How's that different than a woman who wants an abortion?
What is not clear? Women carry a huge burden in child rearing. Men can stop pouting.
green
Well-Known Member
So men carry no burden in child rearing?
Hold on, back up a second. You actually believe in what green is saying?
A man injects his ***** into a woman knowing full well that it could burden her with the greatest burden on earth. Then that man should have a say about her body cause there are money implications? That is ****ed up. DO NOT BURDEN WOMEN IF YOU DO NOT HAVE THE SPINE TO TAKE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR YOUR ACTIONS!
God this world is twisted perverts want to bang an have no consequences. i kin just write my kid off like a tax deduction cause I knocked a girl up an did not want the child. How many of you saying that are being hunted by family social services for back owed child support?