What's new

DNC

Welfare an coddling are two separate notions, but great job lifting this from a **** Marxist website an not referencing.
Potato pototo
 
Are you republicans really still insinuating that Clinton "murders" or "has murdered" someone in the past?

I think the truth is painfully obvious. Sanders sees that if he keeps fighting it will result in both he and Clinton losing. That means in trump winning. A trump win would set progressives and America back years and years.

At this point, sanders is fighting for the country. a trump win is a big loss for every single American.

A Clinton win means that many of Sander's plans will be given a chance as Clinton has adopted them. Whether or not congress passes them is an entirely different thing altogether.

Chappaquiddick. What would it matter? Liberals do not care about murder long as they get there welfare check.
 
Just so you are aware the government has been coddling us with welfare and government assistance programs since before the US even won its independence. In fact the government of every great country in the world has welfare/government assistance. Germany, France, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, Italy, japan, Canada, and on and on. Even back in the day of the Roman empire they gave food for free to those who couldn't afford it.
The Song dynasty government (c.1000AD in China) supported multiple programs which could be classified as social welfare, including the establishment of retirement homes, public clinics, and paupers' graveyards.
Early welfare programs in Europe included the English Poor Law of 1601, which gave parishes the responsibility for providing welfare payments to the poor. It was predominantly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that an organized system of state welfare provision was introduced in many countries. Otto von Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany, introduced one of the first welfare systems for the working classes. In Great Britain the Liberal government of Henry Campbell-Bannerman and David Lloyd George introduced the National Insurance system in 1911, a system later expanded by Clement Attlee.
In the Islamic world, Zakat (charity), one of the Five Pillars of Islam, has been collected by the government since the time of the Rashidun caliph Umar in the 7th century. The taxes were used to provide income for the needy, including the poor, elderly, orphans, widows, and the disabled. According to the Islamic jurist Al-Ghazali (Algazel, 1058–1111), the government was also expected to store up food supplies in every region in case a disaster or famine occurred.
Interestingly enough when bill clinton (a democrat lol) was in office he reformed welfare big time and actually gave money to each individual state to handle welfare on their own. Each state must meet certain criteria to ensure recipients are being encouraged to work themselves out of Welfare. The new program is called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. It encourages states to require some sort of employment search in exchange for providing funds to individuals, and imposes a five-year lifetime limit on cash assistance. In fiscal year 2010, 31.8% of TANF families were white, 31.9% were African-American, and 30.0% were Hispanic.

Seems like it is, and has always been, the government's job to coddle its citizens who need coddling, to some extent.
Who are you and what have you done with Fishbro?
 
So how soft is Bernie?

Trey Burke
Poncho
Bernie Sanders

^The list of people that dalamon embarrassingly repped way too hard
 
8258594f5306bd7bc8de2a0747076a40.jpg
 
Whatever your political leanings, it would be difficult for a normal & rational person to argue with the statement expressed above about Michelle Obama and Barack Obama.

And her speech, and her delivery of it, was terrific.

The part about former first ladies is entirely subjective. Some very good points outside of that but things that can be said about some other first families.
 
I'd give my life for Bernie

If you'd have asked me early yesterday, I was ready to.. Bern.. him on the smoldering coals of the DNC.

But seeing the aftermath.. the look on his face after his speech. After his brother's nomination. After the Aloha lady. It really shows he gave it his all. This dog beat the hell out of Clinton, killed Wasserman-Shultz, raised the bar, pushed social issues more than financial. He did so much even with the DNClinton camp against him from the beginning.

He's not a Benedict Arnold. He's a man that rolled a natural 20 and ran with it. All for naught, as the DM decided he needed a 24.
 
How anybody can look at the Clinton Foundation, and think, "Hey! I really trust these people!" is just beyond me.

On the flip side, Trump University, etc etc.

Great job America. Could have had Kasich. Could have had The Mormon. Even Sanders, whom I strongly dislike, is a better option than these tools.
 
"I'll support you if you give me a private jet."




/which I don't think is a big deal at all btw

Without actually saying it, the feeling is Democrats threatened to cut ties/support to any of his laws/bills that were brought up in the Senate after he lost if he didn't get in line.

This idea is far more easily qualified, and quantified than "dem dirty russinz", as it's a commonly used strong arm tactic on both sides of the aisle.
 
I still have bitter feelings about her trying to strong arm white potatoes out of WIC.
Let it go bro. Purge the hate from your system.
 
Back
Top