Only 21-30 is owed to them we could get the 1-20 portion or we include them to get it back.How do we get 2030 if it's owed to Washington?
Only 21-30 is owed to them we could get the 1-20 portion or we include them to get it back.How do we get 2030 if it's owed to Washington?
swaps in the odd years with the Minny, Cleveland, Lakers picks is really valuable.How many actual picks tho? Swaps are fun, but they arent all that.
Sounds like a pretty massive "if"They owe a top 20 protected pick to the Wiz in 2030 that converts into a second. I think you could give Washington like 4-5 seconds and have that obligation removed. Green going to Hornets may net them something they can re-route or maybe something else is involved.
You could own GS whole draft in a powerful way for 7 years.
There's a lot more money in the franchise now, but as someone who lived in SF for a couple years the "rich" fans from SV seem to get bored pretty quickI would like to add that the Warriors success is built on Steph Curry. They were nobody before he popped and they got lucky on some picks after tanking. I don’t think being big spenders is going to save them from being bad.
Steph Curry is 36. Basically anybody that hasn’t been LeBron James caps out at 38 before they completely fall apart. Steph Curry ain’t Lebron James.
Not really. Just tell them we will take a swap in 2030 instead or they can get a pile of other stuff that can be realized sooner.Sounds like a pretty massive "if"
I would gladly offer to work out a deal where they get the worst of our 2025 picks for that pick back to facilitate a trade. The wiz would jump at that offer since the pick is top 20 protected.How do we get 2030 if it's owed to Washington?
I think the stance remains that the Jazz are only willing to trade him if they get blown away.You hate me like my wife does after I tell her to "Google it" and she finds out I was right.
This is possibly more optimal than the inverse (4 picks 25/27/29/31 and 3 swaps in 26/28/30) because we’d have swap options on four different teams in ‘25 and ‘29, and FIVE different teams in ‘27. We also just don’t need a higher volume of picks in those odd years, we need to increase our odds of premium picks. We could use the extra picks in ‘26, ‘28, and ‘30.Super swaps in 25/27/29/31 and unprotected picks in 26/28/30...
Yeah, if those teams wanted Bridges the most (which tracks if thye went after him first) but werent wiling to pay then, what's making them pay for Lauri? I dont see Golden State having enough juice. It's the Spurs or Rockets as the only real contenders IMO.I think the stance remains that the Jazz are only willing to trade him if they get blown away.
Only thing that's changed is the fact that teams are calling after missing out on Bridges.
The difference is that Pascal was on the market. You have to show up with a deal that PUTS Lauri on the market or the Jazz will be just as happy to keep him, sign him, and turn him into an even bigger asset.
Woj just went on ESPN and said the Warriors have switched gears and are aggressively targeting Markannen.
It will be interesting to see how big of a destination they will be going forward with Curry entering his twilight years. Right now I would put money on them fading as a destination franchise over the next few years.Golden State is a destination franchise with a lot of money. I would like their unprotected picks, but I think they have a much better shot at being a solid team for years rather than the Hawks picks we could get from the Spurs. I appreciate Golden State for being a team that raises the bidding offers, but I dont see them as being a serious team for Lauri.