Red
Well-Known Member
LOL now we cannot even question the integrity of the investigating party? OK. Tell me more who has no understanding. You are letting Trump cloud yer vision.
Daily Beast, nuff said.
First paragraph says 16 lawyers. We ALL know lawyers are out for one think to have a big case an make a name for thereselves. Erin Brockovich says hi.
First profile reads as a reckless madman hellbent on whatever it is he wants.
Yeah, note exactly a level headed person.
Than your DailyBeast goes on to esplain how MUelker has essentially created some ultra-government
No, "Daily Beast, nuff said" is not good enough. That doesn't cut it at all. You have been basically saying Mueller and his team plan on railroading Donald Trump. I presume, then, that you are now in possession of all the evidence that Mueller has gathered. Further, you have analyzed that evidence and now have proven, to your own satisfaction, that it amounts to trumped up charges and, again, it is going to be used to railroad Trump. So, to be fair to all the rest of us who are not privy to all the evidence amassed by Mueller and his team, please provide the information that you possess that has allowed you to conclude that the entire investigation is biased. Again, "Daily Beast, nuff said" does not cut it in the least. It ain't enough said at all. Put up or shut up....
If you want to shorten your task a bit, since the Daily Beast article simply provided brief bios of each member of Mueller's team, please provide your own analysis of each and every member of that team, pointing out where the Daily Beast was inaccurate in its description of each team member. That will be slightly less labor intensive then presenting all of Mueller's evidence to us. So, I'm making it easier for you. Again, bear in mind that "Daily Beast, nuff said" basically says nothing at all. Saying nothing at all is much too easy. I can't very well let you off the hook that easy. So, if you don't want to tell us how you managed to come into possession of all the evidence amassed by Mueller, at least refute the depiction given of Mueller's team members. In other words, just once, how bout you at least actually put up something besides nothing at all?