What's new

Don't Ask, Don't Tell is officially history!!

Capable sure....willing?

Homosexuals also enjoy being parents, and have been having children for years.

And if they chose to procreate would their children all be gay and be forced to procreate against their nature for suvival of the species as well?

Their children would only be moderately more likely to be gay, from what I have read. The children on each island would have a vast majority of straight people, and some gay people.

If it were purely genetic ...

At most, a very small minority thinks it's purely genetic.
 
Homosexuals also enjoy being parents, and have been having children for years.

He was referring to the island population dip ****. Ya know, the turkey basting episode and all. It could be considered a joke to those in tune with what's going on around them.
 
My declaration of faith was stated in the first post clearly, and if it took you reading the portion about body parts it took you too long.

I'm just pointing out you are making additional statements of faith in addition to your first one.

I am talking life, and science here. How many Mammals separate the transfer of genetic material from reproduction as a same act occurrence?

How order-centric of you. Why the arbitrary dividing line at mammal, as opposed to primate or vertebrate?

Why would you have a problem with me saying the main purpose of reproduction organs is for reproduction, or the main purpose of a heart is to move blood, or the main purpose of a colon is to help, or allow, waste to be out of the body? Is that not science?

I don't have a problem with you saying that, but it is not science. Organs and organ systems have functions (lists of things that they do), but not purposes (lists of things they are supposed to do). Within a population, functions change over eons.

Where did you learn your science if you think that is religion?

I have been reading in science all my life, and recently have dipped into the philosophy of science.

It's like basic math. One plus one is two.

Basic math is also an arbitrary exercise, but that's matierial for a different thread.

Even Darwin would laugh at someone who stated the main purpose of sex in humans is not reproduction.

1) Why does it matter what random non-scientific observations Darwin would make? Do you seem him as a holy figure?
2) I suggest you should not speculate on what Darwin would or would not laugh at.
3) Hypothetically, I claim that the primary purpose of sex is the creation of small groups of emotionally commited people. Now, try to show I'm wrong, scientifically.

All other activities will not result in mini-One Brow.

CharityBrow and I already have five little brows, thank you.
 
digging-a-hole.jpg

Is there gold in them holes thar?


"It puts the lotion on it's skin, la la la, or else it gets the choke again, la la la. No, that's not it either. Something will come to me. After all, I've got 38 more years to dig this hole."
 
Seriously did you take biology in school?

Yes.

Do you understand the nature of the development of biological structures in living organisms?

Yes.

The function of body parts is a declaration of faith?

No, the purpose of body parts is a declaration of faith. Function is not purpose. Function is what you do. Purpose is what you are supposed to do.

And what exactly does the sentence in bold above mean? Seriously, biology and english are not your strong suits are they?

By the way, there are far more species of living things that separate the transfer of genetic material from reproduction than have them in the same act. So, any claim the primary purpose of sex is reproduction needs to surmount that hurdle.

Which phrases gave you trouble? Do you know what species are? What it means to transfer genetic material? Did the "than/that" typo confuse you?
 
you aren't looking for a conversation, you aren't looking to learn anything. you've a pitiable set of cliches for your core values and you're desperately trying to justify basing your life on a set of hallmark cards that don't hold up to the scrutiny of reality. this is your life, and you are invested. so you take to debating semantics on a utah jazz message board instead of seeking out more honed resources that would tear down every tower of rationalization you've ever built, every well-tread argument that's been grunted out by every drooling ogre over the past few centuries because it's hard to think and it's hard to realize that you've been lied to your entire ****ing life sooooo. perpetuate the illusion and throw the dictionary at anyone who bests you logically

you are blind and dishonest and there's nothing i want more than to tear down the system of ignorance that ***** out lost causes like you

Can you change your name to Enron, Mr. Smarty Smart Pants? You're so damned enlightened, it's like meeting synthesized Ghandi and the 14th Dali Lama.

Talk about packing in the cliches. If I've ever met or read someone more guilty of being everything they loathe... What a douche bag.
 
i'm sorry if i offended you. but if nature intended for 2 men to get in love and have sex wouldn't nature or evolution provide a way for them to reproduce?

Nature doesn't intend anything. Many sort of species produce individuals who are functional without reproducing. In fact, in a large number of species, the non-reproducing members are more than 95% of the population.
 
I don't plan on changing my mind, just like everyone else, but I do like to know how others think, and why.

How sad for you. I do plan on changing my mind. I don't know when, why, or about what, but I'm fairly sure that sometime in the next ten years I will have changed my mind on 1 to 3 different things that I discuss regularly.

Why are you not researching my side of the argument more fully instead of trying to argue with someone on a jazzfanz board?

Where should we go to research your side?
 
He was referring to the island population dip ****.

So did my response.

Ya know, the turkey basting episode and all. It could be considered a joke to those in tune with what's going on around them.

Human sexual preference is a continuum. Gay people have been marrying straight people, and having children with them, for generations. There is no reason to think they couldn't have children on an island.
 
exactly. if you had simply said this all along, nobody would have questioned you.

they choose, and the rest of us, as human beings, should be tolerant and i would take it a step further and say supportive of their quest for what is nothing more than true happiness. after all, isn't that what we all want in life?

Some people find happiness in being homophobic. If I remember correctly, Santa rewards those who are good for goodness sake, not those happy for happiness sake. That's a pretty shallow argument you got going there Schoolmaster.
 
So did my response.

Human sexual preference is a continuum. Gay people have been marrying straight people, and having children with them, for generations. There is no reason to think they couldn't have children on an island.

I read your response. You've missed the humor twice now. I have no doubt the inhabitants would choose to reproduce, but that's not the point.
 
Dutch,

While I think I can sortof see where you are going with this, you are pretty extreme, and rude about it.
I hope it is the language barrier.
We are all people, no matter what situation we are in, or what we choose to believe.
There should be more respect from both sides on this touchy subject.

Later all... I am done with this thread. Thanks to those who were calm in their reasoning.
I'm going back to the B-Ball side of this place.
PM me if you actually want to have a conversation.
If you want to tell me I'm stupid.....please respond to this post to do so.

it certainly is not my intention to be rude. i was surprised that i got an infraction from the mods. i decided to withdraw from this discussion. once again i apologize to everyone i offended or was unintentionally rude to
 
@ Dutch: How does your thinking reconcile the existence of the whiptail lizard?

i withdrawe from this discussion cus it has been pointed out multiple tmes that i have been rude offensive and whatnot. i received an infractions. one more infractions and i'm suspended.

i will still read this discussion if it goes on though
 
I don't plan on changing my mind, just like everyone else

hahaha i hate when people say this, don't lump me in with your pigheaded stupidity

Can you change your name to Enron, Mr. Smarty Smart Pants? You're so damned enlightened, it's like meeting synthesized Ghandi and the 14th Dali Lama.

Talk about packing in the cliches. If I've ever met or read someone more guilty of being everything they loathe... What a douche bag.

hey what the hell franklin. i thought we had belichick kinship
 
Dutch - I hear what you are saying. So let me ask you this, if a gay man or women does pass the physical requirements then are you ok with them being soliders?
If they are passing all needed qualifications, and are still gay are you against them being in the military?

You are throwing affirmative action into this arguement. Is that really the problem here? Soliders have to meet a certain standard. That should not
be lowered, and I've never heard of that being the in the discussion.
 
i withdrawe from this discussion cus it has been pointed out multiple tmes that i have been rude offensive and whatnot. i received an infractions. one more infractions and i'm suspended.

i will still read this discussion if it goes on though

You recieved infractions for being graphic, and going overboard. Can you carry a conversation like an adult? Is that possible, and if so prove it.
I think it's in you.
 
Back
Top