homeytennis
Well-Known Member
Exum is just at such a different level of development than every other player on the team.
He's returning from a very serious injury.
Exum is just at such a different level of development than every other player on the team.
Exum is just at such a different level of development than every other player on the team.
Why would you think that Exum is not likely to be part of the core? I think the real frustration in this thread is that it is quite obvious that Exum's potential ceiling is vastly higher than Mack's. Mack is a decent backup, Dante could become an allstar. No guarantees, but Mack has zero chance of becoming an AS some day and Dante does.
I'm much more willing to attribute it to incompetence than malice.
Something we need to consider - if he's not playing and he's out of the rotation, maybe he'll be better served to spend some time in the D-League. The team is now in SLC and it will be much easier to keep an eye on him. It's much better for him to play now rather than ride the pine for the Jazz...
The loudest voices praising Q when he was hired by the jazz (not just league-wide but internationally) cited his ability to develop talent. It seems that some people here (an indurrrnet message board) believe he's completely lost touch with this skillset.
To the folks that are pimping Dante for his defense: you're not watching carefully. He's officially being vastly overrated as a defender at this point. On top of this, it's clear that our half-court offense is worse when he's in (relative to our other options). He's definitely useful on the break, but since we aren't a running team, this use value is limited by fit.
Dante needs to find some time somewhere in the rotation, but I think it's fair to say he isn't earning that right now.
It'll be interesting to see if he DNPs on the second half of a back-to-back. That would raise my eyebrows even though I understand why he's been on the pine recently.
Yeah, but how often is the timing perfect where the Stars are playing a home game while Utah is in town not playing a home game? I doubt the Jazz really want to travel without Exum.
That shows up in Utah's win-loss record. When Exum plays 23 minutes or more, the Jazz are 1-7. When he plays less, the Jazz are 9-1.
Exum with Gobert: 200 minutes, -1.0 NetRtg
Mack with Gobert: 147 minutes, +17.4 NetRtg
Exum with Hayward: 174 minutes, +1.4 NetRtg
Mack with Hayward: 155 minutes, +16.7 NetRtg
Exum with Hood: 167 minutes, -8.0 NetRtg
Mack with Hood: 159 minutes, +11.8 NetRtg
Exum with Hill: 51 minutes, -11.8 NetRtg
Mack with Hill: 26 minutes, +23.4 NetRtg
Exum with Gobert and Hayward: 140 minutes, +7.6 NetRtg
Mack with Gobert and Hayward: 87 minutes, +21.2 NetRtg
Exum with Hayward and Hood: 104 minutes, -3.9 NetRtg
Mack with Hayward and Hood: 61 minutes, +22 NetRtg
Exum with Gobert and Hill: 34 minutes, -15.6 NetRtg
Mack with Gobert and Hill: 21 minutes, +27.9 NetRtg
Exum with Gobert, Hayward, and Hood: 96 minutes, -0.2 NetRtg
Mack with Gobert, Hayward, and Hood: 42 minutes, +10.2 NetRtg
very arbitrarily selected cutoff point. I bet the choice had nothing to do with trying to support a point.Ouch.
damn son
Watching those videos, sheesh, can't tell if Exum's defender is playing basketball or football. Looks like a free safety out there.
very arbitrarily selected cutoff point. I bet the choice had nothing to do with trying to support a point.
Small sample on/off numbers are not reliable.
But the numbers support the eye test. When Exum is in the game all I can see is how no on guards him and how much it hurts the offense.
Oh don't get me wrong - he does have his warts and his inability to take advantage of the space he's given is one of them, but I don't think he's as bad as this small sample suggests. I actually thought he was making strides of sort offensively when he was given a chance.