What's new

Exum needs to play over Mack

Exum is just at such a different level of development than every other player on the team.

Agreed. Kid is being pushed by Quinn right now, and he needs to prove that he belongs.

Mack's play and numbers are irrelevant. Exum has a higher standard to live up to, and Quinn is simply removing Dante's plate from in front of him.

It will be interesting to see how he responds when he is put in again.
 
Why would you think that Exum is not likely to be part of the core? I think the real frustration in this thread is that it is quite obvious that Exum's potential ceiling is vastly higher than Mack's. Mack is a decent backup, Dante could become an allstar. No guarantees, but Mack has zero chance of becoming an AS some day and Dante does.

I don't believe I said that Exum is not likely to become part of the core. My point is that IF he turns out not to be part of the core, I'm ok with that, assuming the core we have assembled (Hayward, Hill, Gobert, probably Favors and possibly Hood) is sufficient to create a winning, contending team.

I hope Exum is as good as everyone thinks he can be, but I'm to the point, after enduring years of losing and emphasizing player development, I prioritize winning over his development (if I had to choose, although I don't necessarily believe they are mutually exclusive).
 
The loudest voices praising Q when he was hired by the jazz (not just league-wide but internationally) cited his ability to develop talent. It seems that some people here (an indurrrnet message board) believe he's completely lost touch with this skillset.

To the folks that are pimping Dante for his defense: you're not watching carefully. He's officially being vastly overrated as a defender at this point. On top of this, it's clear that our half-court offense is worse when he's in (relative to our other options). He's definitely useful on the break, but since we aren't a running team, this use value is limited by fit.

Dante needs to find some time somewhere in the rotation, but I think it's fair to say he isn't earning that right now.

It'll be interesting to see if he DNPs on the second half of a back-to-back. That would raise my eyebrows even though I understand why he's been on the pine recently.
 
Something we need to consider - if he's not playing and he's out of the rotation, maybe he'll be better served to spend some time in the D-League. The team is now in SLC and it will be much easier to keep an eye on him. It's much better for him to play now rather than ride the pine for the Jazz...

Yeah, but how often is the timing perfect where the Stars are playing a home game while Utah is in town not playing a home game? I doubt the Jazz really want to travel without Exum.
 
The loudest voices praising Q when he was hired by the jazz (not just league-wide but internationally) cited his ability to develop talent. It seems that some people here (an indurrrnet message board) believe he's completely lost touch with this skillset.

To the folks that are pimping Dante for his defense: you're not watching carefully. He's officially being vastly overrated as a defender at this point. On top of this, it's clear that our half-court offense is worse when he's in (relative to our other options). He's definitely useful on the break, but since we aren't a running team, this use value is limited by fit.

Dante needs to find some time somewhere in the rotation, but I think it's fair to say he isn't earning that right now.

It'll be interesting to see if he DNPs on the second half of a back-to-back. That would raise my eyebrows even though I understand why he's been on the pine recently.

He needs to find a way to play in lineups that are really good offensively (aka lineups with George and Hayward). I would get why Quin is reluctant to do it though. George/Hayward lineups are the most deadly and it would be kind of risky to handicap it when we are currently relying on those lineups to build leads.
 
Yeah, but how often is the timing perfect where the Stars are playing a home game while Utah is in town not playing a home game? I doubt the Jazz really want to travel without Exum.

We are having a stretch with a lot of home games in December. I bet they can synchronize the schedule to make it work.
 
Exum with Gobert: 200 minutes, -1.0 NetRtg
Mack with Gobert: 147 minutes, +17.4 NetRtg
Exum with Hayward: 174 minutes, +1.4 NetRtg
Mack with Hayward: 155 minutes, +16.7 NetRtg
Exum with Hood: 167 minutes, -8.0 NetRtg
Mack with Hood: 159 minutes, +11.8 NetRtg
Exum with Hill: 51 minutes, -11.8 NetRtg
Mack with Hill: 26 minutes, +23.4 NetRtg
Exum with Gobert and Hayward: 140 minutes, +7.6 NetRtg
Mack with Gobert and Hayward: 87 minutes, +21.2 NetRtg
Exum with Hayward and Hood: 104 minutes, -3.9 NetRtg
Mack with Hayward and Hood: 61 minutes, +22 NetRtg
Exum with Gobert and Hill: 34 minutes, -15.6 NetRtg
Mack with Gobert and Hill: 21 minutes, +27.9 NetRtg
Exum with Gobert, Hayward, and Hood: 96 minutes, -0.2 NetRtg
Mack with Gobert, Hayward, and Hood: 42 minutes, +10.2 NetRtg

damn son
 
Watching those videos, sheesh, can't tell if Exum's defender is playing basketball or football. Looks like a free safety out there.
 
Watching those videos, sheesh, can't tell if Exum's defender is playing basketball or football. Looks like a free safety out there.

Have you not noticed that in game? It's really horrendous. It's not even like when he does get the ball his defender even really tries to close out on him.
 
very arbitrarily selected cutoff point. I bet the choice had nothing to do with trying to support a point.



Small sample on/off numbers are not reliable.

But the numbers support the eye test. When Exum is in the game all I can see is how no on guards him and how much it hurts the offense.
 
But the numbers support the eye test. When Exum is in the game all I can see is how no on guards him and how much it hurts the offense.

Oh don't get me wrong - he does have his warts and his inability to take advantage of the space he's given is one of them, but I don't think he's as bad as this small sample suggests. I actually thought he was making strides of sort offensively when he was given a chance.
 
Oh don't get me wrong - he does have his warts and his inability to take advantage of the space he's given is one of them, but I don't think he's as bad as this small sample suggests. I actually thought he was making strides of sort offensively when he was given a chance.

He is, but they are just individual offensive things he is doing, like a few cool/nifty moves. They don't really change how anyone guards him (or doesnt guard him).
 
Like I said, Exum is at a completely different point in his development. He still has to learn how to play basketball and be effective. Everyone else knows how to play and make themselves weapons, it's just a matter of fine tuning and being consistent. With Exum out there it just slows everyone else down and kind of kills the teams ability to develop as a unit. It just sucks last year Exum got injured and he missed our last year we could really focus on development and not wins. I hope Quin finds minutes for him, but I'm not going to be overly upset as long as we are winning.
 
Back
Top