What's new
By:

Following 2016 potential draftees

spycam1 said:
It's not like we would need Skal to contribute right away, either.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

He'd actually be ideal for us because our rotation is full... he can develop and get stronger.
 
spycam1 said:
Yeah, I like his potential a lot honestly. If the Jazz are in the lottery and Skal falls to us, it could be as big of a coup as when Drummond dropped.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I hear ya but we have so many weakass ******* on this team, I'm not sure I want another who becomes the poster boy for that.
 
Who has skill (shooting preferred), plays with fire and leads and yet isn't a dumbass retard who will get techs left and right or make constant stupid passes or take stupid shots or impregnate Utahrn 21 year olds?

Cause I want someone like that.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
Who has skill (shooting preferred), plays with fire and leads and yet isn't a dumbass retard who will get techs left and right or make constant stupid passes or take stupid shots or impregnate Utahrn 21 year olds?

Cause I want someone like that.
Click to expand...

Jamal Murray. Alpha male. Uber confident. Ice water in his veins.
Scoring machine.
 
I'm also not a fan of getting a 1/2 combo. Exum, Burke, Burks, Hood, and Neto. They will all eat up time at the 1 or 2.
 
Just trade this year's pick to the Kings for their 2017 1st if they can do that. They perpetually suck and the Cousins/Rondo/Karl **** will blow up sooner rather than later imo.
 
Murray has completely committed to defense and its night and day. Not a liability.
Yes, I am objective. See my Skal comments.
Murray is not a combo. He's a SG that can play point easily. But he's a flat out scorer.
Google Murray Duke highlights. That was early in the season and he's gotten better by the game.
 
Burks is also an alpha and he just doesn't "fit" for me. Is Murray a "fit to win" guy?

Just made that phrase up by the way and sort of like it. The Spurs have fit-to-win guys.
 
I know he's already 22 but Buddy Hield and his bravado (and shooting) would be sweet here. He may only be 6'4" but he has a 6'8.5" wingspan which is longer than Hayward's and the same as Hood's.

Exum-Burke
Hield-Hood
Hayward-Ingles
Favors-Lyles
Gobert-Withey

I could really dig that team.

Trade Burks for a 2017 1st.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
I know he's already 22 but Buddy Hield and his bravado (and shooting) would be sweet here. He may only be 6'4" but he has a 6'8.5" wingspan which is longer than Hayward's and the same as Hood's.

Exum-Burke
Hield-Hood
Hayward-Ingles
Favors-Lyles
Gobert-Withey

I could really dig that team.

Trade Burks for a 2017 1st.
Click to expand...

Yeah that's not bad.
 
Murray has scored in single digits only once this season (2nd game). His point totals;

8
12
12
13
16
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
21
21
21
22
33

He has also hit 32 of his last 75 3pt attempts for 42.5%
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top