What's new

Following 2016 potential draftees

If Josh Scott played decently in that opener vs Iowa St. they'd have won the game. They were 10 pt dogs too. If Askia Booker didn't declare for the draft, I'd like them much more. One of the fouls they called on Scott was so bogus though, totally clean block on Georges Niang, and they blew the whistle.

Scott is like a poorman's Jarrett Allen.. He appears every bit of 6'10" standing next to Niang, so I agree he's a potentially good 2nd rd prospect.

The Zags are overrated, no way their the best in the west. Pitt looked like they were about to pull off the upset, on that ice skating rink they were playing on in Japan. They should've had a bigger advantage with that court and Karnowski, Pretty sure Utah will kill them.

1/10 from the field for Trier in the opener. Ray Smith was a big loss for them.

Don't sleep on Oregon either, Dorsey and Brooks are NBA prospects, I'd have them in the top-25 preseason.


Scott has that old school game about him. Hooks with either hands and good post moves. For not being very athletic he also blocks some shots. I agree Zags are overrated nearly every year and fflame out early but Sabonis, Wow I just like that kid
 
Wow..
The highlights from SKAL tonight will get some attention. He's 100% from the field (thus far) on a huge variety of shots.

16pts
5rbs
4blks

In 12 minutes.
 
Briscoe with a team-high 7 boards at the half..

Kris Dunn's final stat line in his opener vs Harvard; 32 Pts, 6 Reb, 5 Ast, 8 Stl, 2 Blk 11/26 shooting. 1/1 from 3, 9/11 ft's
 
Briscoe with a team-high 7 boards at the half..

Kris Dunn's final stat line in his opener vs Harvard; 32 Pts, 6 Reb, 5 Ast, 8 Stl, 2 Blk 11/26 shooting. 1/1 from 3, 9/11 ft's

Ya beat me by a minute:-) He had 7 steals at the half.
 
This showing from Skal is rather convincing IMO. He finally missed, an 18 footer left but it almost rolled in because of his shooting touch.
 
I've overstayed my welcome here, obviously. I'll be back to talk my **** again in 2016. Good luck Jazzfanzers. Most of you will need it.

That performance from Skal wasn't quite as convincing as how Anthony Davis started.It was enough for me to confirm that Skal should be #1 in these mocks though..

Skal is going to help some team in the NBA's offense next year, probably in a big way. Plus, he's far from a liability in the other aspects of his game. 2-way player thru and thru.

(figured there'd be highlights.. someone should post them, when they get made)

Also want to point out something I've observed from Skal -- Which leads me to believe he's got 'It'.. When he makes a mistake, or misses a shot or something, I really like how he recovers from that on the next defensive possession, It's almost like he tries to make up for the mistake, thing is he's kinda really damn effective doing so(which is far from normal, usually that stuff looks reckless), like jumping passing lanes and getting blocks -- One might say he looks like a natural..
 
I've overstayed my welcome here, obviously. I'll be back to talk my **** again in 2016. Good luck Jazzfanzers. Most of you will need it.

That performance from Skal wasn't quite as convincing as how Anthony Davis started.It was enough for me to confirm that Skal should be #1 in these mocks though..

Skal is going to help some team in the NBA's offense next year, probably in a big way. Plus, he's far from a liability in the other aspects of his game. 2-way player thru and thru.

(figured there'd be highlights.. someone should post them, when they get made)

Also want to point out something I've observed from Skal -- Which leads me to believe he's got 'It'.. When he makes a mistake, or misses a shot or something, I really like how he recovers from that on the next defensive possession, It's almost like he tries to make up for the mistake, thing is he's kinda really damn effective doing so(which is far from normal, usually that stuff looks reckless), like jumping passing lanes and getting blocks -- One might say he looks like a natural..

Oh noes?! Why you leave? we like it you tell us how stupid we can be and how smart you are than everyone. I pray for jesus can help your mind.
 
Oh noes?! Why you leave? we like it you tell us how stupid we can be and how smart you are than everyone. I pray for jesus can help your mind.

I see no constituent function in sticking around here for 8 months to repeat myself, it's clearly a waste of my time. I really don't like the majority of the posters on this board, or care to read their posts, I'm sure the feelings mutual -- I certainly wouldn't have it any other way..

Y'all ****ers are on multiple accounts to spread your bad calls out too, ****s hysterical. ****ing weasels. posters on this forum spend just as much time as I do on this ****, and still jump to terrible conclusions, consistently..

Due to my neverending search for actionable information, I'll always be able to flood a forum like this with good info, I don't see that as a worthy time sink though, games are live, my research is mostly done, I've already kicked my feet up. I'm gonna cruise to 75%-80% accuracy this year(I can count cards at nearly a 57% accuracy rate - that wasn't good enough though..), and I'm gonna make it look easy too -- Keep hating tho bitches:mad: If you actually saw how organized my **** is, you'd ask 'how'd you do it?' (like most everyone else) and probably bow down shortly thereafter..

y'all cant see me in this ****, who are we kidding?!?:cool:

I'm actually planning for next season already, I have the regular seasons mapped out(for future adjustments) totally already.

I can easily destroy thru the faulty logic presented in these threads in just a day or 2 leading up to the draft, so why stick around?? So I can be convinced over the course of months Nigel Hayes and Bobby Portis are players the Jazz need? or that Aaron Gordon should be drafted with the tank pick, so he could be Favors back-up PF.. So people can tell me Porzingis and LaVine are too skinny? I'd rather watch you bums swing and miss all by yourselves. I don't get any entertainment value in explaining these simple concepts people fail to recognize, over and over, It's all good.





If there was a worthy adversary who wanted to match wits, I'd be here ready to duel, I don't see any of those though, I see people hiding behind multiple accounts acting like bitches, playing roles like bitches, I come here and just drop my opinion -- and get scrutinized for it consistently, despite maintaining a pretty high accuracy rate -- because just like some bitches, you don't care about past history, my resume more than speaks for itself, you want to hold my feet to the fire about what's gonna happen next -- I know that too, I just don't care to explain it to y'all.. If we were friends I'd send ya a crash course in 1 minute. We're not friends tho, I don't want any new friends, I came here for discussion, not networking.

y'all bitches mostly bow down in these back-and-forth's with me anyway, because you're woefully under-prepared, I put in the time to ensure I stay accurate -- while some of you lames are still searching for the blueprint (that I had in my mid-teens)..

So this site has become more boring to me, i'm not a scavenger, I like to pick on live prey, as far as I'm concerned I've already picked this place clean.
 
Last edited:
I see no constituent function in sticking around here for 8 months to repeat myself, it's clearly a waste of my time. I really don't like the majority of the posters on this board, or care to read their posts, I'm sure the feelings mutual -- I certainly wouldn't have it any other way..

Y'all ****ers are on multiple accounts to spread your bad calls out too, ****s hysterical. ****ing weasels. posters on this forum spend just as much time as I do on this ****, and still jump to terrible conclusions, consistently..

Due to my neverending search for actionable information, I'll always be able to flood a forum like this with good info, I don't see that as a worthy time sink though, games are live, my research is mostly done, I've already kicked my feet up. I'm gonna cruise to 75%-80% accuracy this year(I can count cards at nearly a 57% accuracy rate - that wasn't good enough though..), and I'm gonna make it look easy too -- Keep hating tho bitches:mad: If you actually saw how organized my **** is, you'd ask 'how'd you do it?' (like most everyone else) and probably bow down shortly thereafter..

y'all cant see me in this ****, who are we kidding?!?:cool:

I'm actually planning for next season already, I have the regular seasons mapped out(for future adjustments) totally already.

I can easily destroy thru the faulty logic presented in these threads in just a day or 2 leading up to the draft, so why stick around?? So I can be convinced over the course of months Nigel Hayes and Bobby Portis are players the Jazz need? or that Aaron Gordon should be drafted with the tank pick, so he could be Favors back-up PF.. So people can tell me Porzingis and LaVine are too skinny? I'd rather watch you bums swing and miss all by yourselves. I don't get any entertainment value in explaining these simple concepts people fail to recognize, over and over, It's all good.





If there was a worthy adversary who wanted to match wits, I'd be here ready to duel, I don't see any of those though, I see people hiding behind multiple accounts acting like bitches, playing roles like bitches, I come here and just drop my opinion -- and get scrutinized for it consistently, despite maintaining a pretty high accuracy rate -- because just like some bitches, you don't care about past history, my resume more than speaks for itself, you want to hold my feet to the fire about what's gonna happen next -- I know that too, I just don't care to explain it to y'all.. If we were friends I'd send ya a crash course in 1 minute. We're not friends tho, I don't want any new friends, I came here for discussion, not networking.

y'all bitches mostly bow down in these back-and-forth's with me anyway, because you're woefully under-prepared, I put in the time to ensure I stay accurate -- while some of you lames are still searching for the blueprint (that I had in my mid-teens)..

So this site has become more boring to me, i'm not a scavenger, I like to pick on live prey, as far as I'm concerned I've already picked this place clean.

Just so you are aware, everyone here believes you are the most knowledgeable poster regarding HS scouting. The only reason they take jabs is how responsive you are. If you ignore or just laugh along, they will stop. It's like a sport, of sorts.

My advice is to rise above rather than coming off thin-skinned.
 
Just so you are aware, everyone here believes you are the most knowledgeable poster regarding HS scouting. The only reason they take jabs is how responsive you are. If you ignore or just laugh along, they will stop. It's like a sport, of sorts.

My advice is to rise above rather than coming off thin-skinned.


KY are a bunch of cheating dumb dumb slobber knockers. :D Regarding Skal true looks like he will definitely be top 3, but shall we wait until he plays against good competition before declaring him #1. Simmons looked very good as well. Bender playing against grown men so not getting a lot of playing time. However, he did get some decent PT in his most recent Israeli League game and did pretty well.
 
KY are a bunch of cheating dumb dumb slobber knockers. :D Regarding Skal true looks like he will definitely be top 3, but shall we wait until he plays against good competition before declaring him #1. Simmons looked very good as well. Bender playing against grown men so not getting a lot of playing time. However, he did get some decent PT in his most recent Israeli League game and did pretty well.

I'm not ready to crown anyone #1 yet.
 
I'm not ready to crown anyone #1 yet.

Wise man indeed. Should know a little more after tomorrow, but obviously still to early. Ellenson was one of the few who played against good comp and played well. Of course the scouts will want to see him shoot 3s better though.
 
Good early season chance to see some top recruits play real comp tonight with KY vs Duke and KS vs Michigan State. Grayson Allen has looked really good for one.
 
Back
Top