What's new
By:

Following potential 2013 draftees

mhindy said:
To be fair, we can likely draft Schroeder with 14. Rondo not so much.

I'd be thrilled with Schroeder, I like the length we're beginning to accumulate and he would be another step towards an Indiana-esque defense that funnels everything to Favors in the paint and creates a lot of deflections.
Click to expand...

I went on record as such by halftime of Hoops..

But I'd still rather have Rondo.
 
mhindy said:
To be fair, we can likely draft Schroeder with 14. Rondo not so much.

I'd be thrilled with Schroeder, I like the length we're beginning to accumulate and he would be another step towards an Indiana-esque defense that funnels everything to Favors in the paint and creates a lot of deflections.
Click to expand...

Yes and yes.
 
PKM said:
I went on record as such by halftime of Hoops..

But I'd still rather have Rondo.
Click to expand...

Me too, but considering that anything involving Hayward, Favors, or Kanter is pretty much a non-starter I don't know that we can realistically hope to acquire him. Schroeder is a prospect I can get excited about. I like his ability to change speed and the way he looks for rollers off a pick and roll.
 
AB_PG has very good write ups, credit you for that. But the highlight videos show us nothing but good plays, they are a waste of time.
 
NBN said:
AB_PG has very good write ups, credit you for that. But the highlight videos show us nothing but good plays, they are a waste of time.
Click to expand...

yeah i mean i watch all the vids to look for small nuianced things, theres usually just like one play i really like, some of them i think demonstrate what im talking about.

also Hairston might be able to shoot near 40% for 3 for a prolonged amount of time, i dont see that from bullock, hairston is like Glen Rice JR without the character concerns..

i know how high certain players of certain sizes jump(and how quickly), and how many steps and dribbles it takes certain players to do things of that nature, my eyes are very smart so things look familiar than i investigate further

thats why i really like schroder

hes no Marcus Williams (whom i had over Rondo) BUT I had them both way higher than consensus, so how wrong was i really? (and Jersey/GSW[i forget] was a terribad spot for Marcus)

what if i said "rajon rondo is a good rebounder" posted this vid to reinforce it->https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnc9ez485vI

then say but pay no mind to his rebounds, or that video, because it doesnt show the rebounds he doesnt get, so its not "fair"
 
Last edited:
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
yeah i mean i watch all the vids to look for small nuianced things, theres usually just like one play i really like or something on the vids i post but some of them id like to think demonstrate what im talking about.

also Hairston might be able to shoot near 40% for 3 for a prolonged amount of time, i dont see that from bullock, hairston is like Glen Rice JR without the character concerns..
Click to expand...

I can be hard on you at times, but you have very good write ups. Hairston is just a straight beast, fell in love with him watching the ACC tournament and NCAA tournament. Mainly just seeing him drill NBA threes with a cut up shooting hand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top