Kansas is playing today... Yay...
Perhaps instead of saying that based on past history of drafts (which is completely irrelevant btw) there will only be 1-2 players that pan out, you should analyze each player specifically and make that judgment. Again, each draft is different and each player is different.
Basically what you're saying is that since Kenyon Martin went #1, every #1 pick is going to be an average to slightly above-average player for his career. Or that since LeBron went #1, any high schooler that could potentially come out in the future is going to be a bonafide star in the league. Basically what I'm saying is that your argument sucks. If you still feel strongly about what you're saying, come back with an analysis of the players and tell us why you don't think they'll be good. Don't just point to past results in the draft and expect that to be a solid argument.
Perhaps instead of saying that based on past history of drafts (which is completely irrelevant btw) there will only be 1-2 players that pan out, you should analyze each player specifically and make that judgment. Again, each draft is different and each player is different.
Basically what you're saying is that since Kenyon Martin went #1, every #1 pick is going to be an average to slightly above-average player for his career. Or that since LeBron went #1, any high schooler that could potentially come out in the future is going to be a bonafide star in the league. Basically what I'm saying is that your argument sucks. If you still feel strongly about what you're saying, come back with an analysis of the players and tell us why you don't think they'll be good. Don't just point to past results in the draft and expect that to be a solid argument.
This better end this stupid argument. Hantlers just owned wolf.
Basically what you're saying is that since Kenyon Martin went #1, every #1 pick is going to be an average to slightly above-average player for his career. Or that since LeBron went #1, any high schooler that could potentially come out in the future is going to be a bonafide star in the league. Basically what I'm saying is that your argument sucks. If you still feel strongly about what you're saying, come back with an analysis of the players and tell us why you don't think they'll be good. Don't just point to past results in the draft and expect that to be a solid argument.
ESPN commentator commenting on Cal's comment that "these are some of the nicest kids I've ever coached", and wondering if "Niceness" is what you need to win.
I've said this about the twins, seems they're lacking that competitive fire. I've yet to any twins in competitive sports displaying much fire in the belly type aggression. The reason being they don't want to "outshine" one another and leaving the other behind.
People outside Asia most often don't like their food as spicy. So it's only logical that most don't have fire in their belly.
The ****?
Its more like, in pretty much every draft, there is 1 star (allnba), 2 players that make at least a single allstar game, and a handful of starters. Odds are this draft isn't much different. I'm being generous in saying that there might be 2 stars.
Don't know where you pulled your **** from. Where did I say anything about 1 draft determining everything? Retarded.
And how are past drafts irrelevant? They are completely relevant.