Following potential 2017 draftees...
- Thread starter Dr. Jones
- Start date
Dude jumps on the Frank Jackson and Kyle Kuzma bandwagon and then tries to make up a definition for correlation. This is hilarious.
Okay, put this to bed. What are you guys talking about -- a correlation between height and wing-span? There's obviously some correlation in that taller people on average will have a longer wingspan. You can use statistics and calculate standard deviations to demonstrate this. However, there is obviously also variance in proportion. People have varying height-to-wingspan ratios.
Is that what you're talking about? Can we move on now?
Is that what you're talking about? Can we move on now?
Got it dude. Under your definition of correlation, there is no correlation between height and standing reach. This is cute, like when an 8 year old tries to explain why the sky is blue.
I honestly have no idea what he is talking about. I said there is a correlation between height and standing reach and he is babbling about something just to argue. I'm thoroughly enjoying it.
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
What is the DIRECT correlation.. There is none. It holds no weight in this arena. You are clinging to semantics once again.
I stand here waiting to bring examples to the table. Show us the examples of why you're right and I'll shred them to pieces in an instant.
Jazz apparently interviewed TJ Leaf at the Combine.
You are the one bringing semantics into anything. I said there is a correlation. You keep babbling about nothing.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...ength_in_students_of_SEGi_University_Malaysia
You are welcome to read on it if this interest you so much.
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
Checkmate. U are not a worthy opponent. You're a bitch hiding behind a keyboard.
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
WHAT IS THE CORRELATION?! NUMBERS.. LETS HEAR THEM... Cite other peoples **** all you want. tell us in your words.
And you are being a stupid bitch behind a keyboard. It's hilarious.
Read the study.
cross-sectional, anthropometric survey was conducted among local students (154 males and 164 females, total = 315) of SEGi University, Malaysia to correlate wingspan length to body length. Measurements were recorded and statistical analysis were done using SPSS version 21.0. Males were taller and had longer wingspan than females. The wingspan – body length ratio was 1.016, indicating wing span to be longer than body length. Males (1.023) had a significantly higher ratio than females (1.001). A strong positive correlation between the two measurements was observed (r = 0.93). The correlation coefficient was not significantly different in males (r = 0.824) and females (r = 0.789). Keywords: standing height, arm span, anthropometric measurements, stature.
Correlative study of wingspan (armspan) length and body length in students of SEGi University, Malaysia (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/public...ength_in_students_of_SEGi_University_Malaysia [accessed May 11, 2017].
Since you seem pretty stupid, a "r" value closer to +1 shows a strong relationship between the two variables.
Correlative study of wingspan (armspan) length and body length in students of SEGi University, Malaysia (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/public...ength_in_students_of_SEGi_University_Malaysia [accessed May 11, 2017].
Since you seem pretty stupid, a "r" value closer to +1 shows a strong relationship between the two variables.
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
YOU CAN't demonstrate the argument yourself. We can both agree on that right? you're unfit to answer my questions.
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
Ok so now were finally getting somewhere. Strong Relationship doesnt mean direct correlation *******. Check-mate.
You done now?
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
I thought you were leaving the site
Why don't you guys exchange email addresses and continue this elsewhere...
PG_AB, I think you're going overboard with this. I'm not sure what your point is.
PG_AB, I think you're going overboard with this. I'm not sure what your point is.
Man you are dumb as hell. Why would I gather data and run a SAS procedure just to prove a clearly obvious point to you? If you were trying to troll me into running a pointless statistical analysis, then lmao nice try.
You are probably just that stupid though.
I see no correlation between PGAB saying he will leave the site and him actually leaving the sight, sadly.
Man, you are one funny dude.