What's new
By:

Game Of Thrones

so trying to understand why they havent killed him earlier. is anoying?
just trying to discus it.

look from a story telling standpoint i get it. you need like a villian a bad guy, but alteast make him kinda "invincible. by having some magic shield or batman as a bodyguard.

it is just hard to swallow nobody did anything until someone cowardly poisoned him
 
If you don't want to get spoiled on the latest episode stay the **** out of this thread. It's that simple.

Anyway, I just finished watching Sunday's episode. Man, that last scene gave me the chills. Great episode. Would watch again!
 
VINYLONE said:
If you don't want to get spoiled on the latest episode stay the **** out of this thread. It's that simple.

Anyway, I just finished watching Sunday's episode. Man, that last scene gave me the chills. Great episode. Would watch again!
Click to expand...

Which scene was that?

I love the scene where dany gave her speach outside the walls of mereen
 
DutchJazzer said:
wont they skip the battle due to budgetary reason?


be like time jump to when the city was overtaken? and slaves joining up.

just like in wire.
for example in wire all officer shootings where ofscreen
Click to expand...

That would be consistent with the way they've done battles so far. For instance, at the end of season 1, Tyrion got knocked out, and then when he woke up the battle was over. So yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if the next time we see Dany, she's taken the city already.
 
AtheistPreacher said:
That would be consistent with the way they've done battles so far. For instance, at the end of season 1, Tyrion got knocked out, and then when he woke up the battle was over. So yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if the next time we see Dany, she's taken the city already.
Click to expand...

al;though with the immense opopularity. and cable and tv providers all over the world buying and paying for those rights. and itunes/vod sales. they might ahve a bigger budget and finally do a lord of the rings style battle.

or atleast a small dark knioght rises all out brawl
 
AtheistPreacher said:
That would be consistent with the way they've done battles so far. For instance, at the end of season 1, Tyrion got knocked out, and then when he woke up the battle was over. So yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if the next time we see Dany, she's taken the city already.
Click to expand...

Actually, I don't mind this at all. Leaves time for plot/character development. This is a tv series so what they can put out there is limited. I liked what they did with the battle at King's Landing. Show some glimpses of figthing get right to the scheming after.
 
Hekate said:
Actually, I don't mind this at all. Leaves time for plot/character development. This is a tv series so what they can put out there is limited. I liked what they did with the battle at King's Landing. Show some glimpses of figthing get right to the scheming after.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I don't particularly mind it either. There's plenty of visceral action/violence in the show without needing to blow your budget on large-scale battles. The Blackwater is really the only big battle they've actually shown on-camera, and that was because it also contained a lot of important character moments: Tyrion rallying the troops, Cersei holed up with Sansa and the court ladies, the Hound running from fire, etc etc.
 
Haven't read the book, but I bet Lord Baelish was the killer. He'd been sizing up Sansa for a while now with his "Call me Petyr" pickup line. He had everything all set up including the boat, the ship, etc.



Poison must be in that large pie, there's on doubt about that.



Note: Those who have read the book, just play along with it, no spoilers please.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Haven't read the book, but I bet Lord Baelish was the killer. He'd been sizing up Sansa for a while now with his "Call me Petyr" pickup line. He had everything all set up including the boat, the ship, etc.



Poison must be in that large pie, there's on doubt about that.



Note: Those who have read the book, just play along with it, no spoilers please.
Click to expand...

no spoilers form book.

but the poison was the necklace stones.

he mentioned it to her.

someone dont know who slipped one of necklace stones into his drink.
implying his (ex)wife with the murder.

he explained it to her on the ship
 
DutchJazzer said:
no spoilers form book.

but the poison was the necklace stones.

he mentioned it to her.

someone dont know who slipped one of necklace stones into his drink.
implying his (ex)wife with the murder.

he explained it to her on the ship
Click to expand...

Bro, no offense, but can you please not speak in cryptic English?
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Bro, no offense, but can you please not speak in cryptic English?
Click to expand...

you cant understand game of thrones english. so dont blame my english.
as i said.i have not read the books.


but it is already explained in the tv show that lord bailesh was the killer. or atleast in on the conspiracy.
he used the necklace sansa was wearing. those stones where the poison.

someone at the wedding then took the stones from sansa and slipped it in gofreys drink.
hence poisoning him.

geez louis is it hard to comprehend a simple pretty straightfoward tv show?

heck english isnt my first language. not even my 2nd language.
it is my 3rd. i watch the tv show on one monitor while getting work done on another. yet i grasp the simple context.

yet you who cant even grasp it. supposedly your first language.

seriously bro if something is to complicated quit it
 
Hotttnickkk said:
^^^

I must have missed it, but who was it that said that the stones were the poison?
Click to expand...

Baelish did. Well, he didn't come right out and say exactly, but he explained to Sansa that the necklace was a fake, and there was no good reason to give her a necklace with fake crystals on it unless they were poison.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top