What's new

Gordon VS. Vonleh

Who do you pick out of these two?

  • Aaron Gordon

    Votes: 35 60.3%
  • Noah Vonleh

    Votes: 23 39.7%

  • Total voters
    58
Fwiw, I think it's tougher to predict how good Gordon will be than any other player in this draft. I could see him being a top 3 player when we look back on it, or not even top 10.
 
Another good question would be, who do you fear more coming in and kicking our ***** as a Laker? Gordon or Vonleh. I have absolutely no fear of Vonleh. I can see Gordon giving us nightmares for years just like Scottie Pippen did (as a Bull obviously.) I think Scotty did more to beat the Finals Jazz than Jordan did.
 
Another good question would be, who do you fear more coming in and kicking our ***** as a Laker? Gordon or Vonleh. I have absolutely no fear of Vonleh. I can see Gordon giving us nightmares for years just like Scottie Pippen did (as a Bull obviously.) I think Scotty did more to beat the Finals Jazz than Jordan did.

The guys who will come in and kick our *** in the near term will be Embiid, Parker, Exum, Smart and Randle. I have no more fear of Gordon than I do Aminu.
 
Another good question would be, who do you fear more coming in and kicking our ***** as a Laker? Gordon or Vonleh. I have absolutely no fear of Vonleh. I can see Gordon giving us nightmares for years just like Scottie Pippen did (as a Bull obviously.) I think Scotty did more to beat the Finals Jazz than Jordan did.

MKG was compared to Pippen a lot in 2012, it doesn't look like its going to happen.
 
haha Sexual Favors is a bit delusional. great stuff, care to predict Aaron Gordons rookie stats??

No. That is pointless. It all depends on situation, role, and minutes. Too many variables to go off of.

patting youself on the back about refuting the MKG comparison is just beyond absurd, i already pointed out a list of basic stats from their freshman years that are identical.

Yes, and the keyword here is "basic." Furthermore, I also responded by pointing out that Anthony Bennett and Jabari Parker have near identical PER 40's, and are both projected tweeners. Does this mean Jabari will be Anthony Bennett? I don't think so. A lot of players share basic stats. So what?


both are 18 at the time of the draft, and we're talked about about as top 5 players coming out of HS and going into the draft, similar positional (both played 3 and 4 in college) and shooting questions surround both players


And you think this makes them the same player?

MKG really could not shoot. He shot 25% from 3.

Gordon shot 35% from 3. A 10% difference at that range is all the difference in the world.
MKG's shot NEVER looked right. He doesn't even have consistent form. Sometimes he brings it back behind his head. Others times his shoulders and arms are crooked. Gordon's looks consistent and a lot purer. Could he he have more touch? Absolutely. But should we be MKG scared? No way in hell.

And are you really comparing the depth of the 2012 draft to the 2014 draft? Just because they were projected as a similar rank coming out of high school is irrelevant. The classes are two different beasts with different depth at each position.




similar reputations for "intangibles", lockdown defense and for being above average rebounders, both are dynamic in transition but not so much in halfcourt offense.

Kidd-Gilchrist has an excellent feel for the game, which shows up in the way he moves intelligently without the ball, as well as with his passing skills, which are very well developed considering his age.
from a dx scouting report before the draft. that sounds like whats said about Gordon, no?


Similar praise, but because it wasn't completely true for one, it makes it false for another? Or something to be scared of? I'm not sure What point you're trying to make with this wrap around logic. Players bust all the time. Are you saying that any player with defensive skills and an ability to pass is automatically a bust? That is obviously untrue.


SF said completely different bodies completely different skills, id disagree on both counts

Aaron Gordon's standing reach 8'9" MKG's 8'8½", Wingspans are within ¼", MKG's 12 lbs heavier, similar sized hands

MKG is 6'5.75" w/o shoes and 6'7.5" w/ them.Gordon is 6'7.5 w/o shoes and 6'8.75" w/o them. Or, 6'9" w/ MKG's shoes :)
This is the NBA. Height really matters.

Also, MKG had a body fat % of 7.0, compared to A. Gordon's 5.1

Gordon is ripped, and his torso makes the V shape which allows for more upper body strength, while MKG's shoulders are more in line with his hips.

Again, the height differential is huge. The frames are different, in favor of Gordon's more pronounced V, and A. Gordon either takes better care of his body, or has a naturally more athletic body, as evidenced by his better body fat %. These things add up, and they matter greatly.

im sure in your estimation Gordon is a much better athlete but the difference is certainly marginal by almost all measurables, for all the faults of MKG's first few years hes certainly had some monster dunks. combine testing showed Gordon has slightly more vertical and better lane agility

Slightly more vertical? Aaron Gordon had 39" compared to MKG's 35.5" . A. Gordon and his people claim he underjumped as well. They say his personal best is 42".

But let's say A. Gordon's vertical is really 39". And he stands 6'9" in MKG's shoes as already proven. When he is rising to the hoop, he is rising a full 5" higher than MKG. That is a very big difference. If he really does jump 42", then the difference is 8".


your main points are a 2" height difference, i see only a 1¼" difference in shoes, which is what basketball is played in.



https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Michael-Kidd-Gilchrist-5707/
https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Michael-Kidd-Gilchrist-5707/
^ MKG is 6'5.7" w/o shoes

https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Aaron-Gordon-6458/
https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Aaron-Gordon-6458/

^ A, Gordon is 6'7.5" w/o them.

Your argument is basketball is played in shoes? So it doesn't matter how high the sole is? Preposterous. A. Gordon could just as easily buy bigger shoes to inflate his height. Measuring w/o shoes tells you the truth.

After looking at the data again, I see I posted it wrong the first time. A. Gordon is 1.75" taller.


a turnover ratio that hasn't translated into an issue for MKG in the pros',

Really? You don't think having a 12.5% TO rate, which is markedly worse than the league average, is a big deal to his and his team's success? Admittedly, he is faring better than the 17.3% he got up to in college, but to say it isn't affecting him would be untrue.


and 3point shooting based on 45 attempts without ofcourse acknowledging him shooting 3/17 in 18 conference games, also MKG conference 3pt shooting 2/16... yet another similarity

His shooting has already been discussed by myself, framer, phippsj, and multiple others who actually watched him play.

It's already been said that it would've been nice to see him shoot more, but it wasn't in Arizona's offense for him because of who they already had, and where they needed him on the court. When he shot a 3, it was due to a broken play. 35.6% on broken plays is probably pretty good.

You're insinuating that Aaron's 3pt% would've gone down had he shot more, but one could also assume it could've gone up if the plays were designed for him.

At the end of the day, A. Gordon's 35.6% on 45 attempted 3's is still 10% better than MkG's 25.5% on 51 attempts. Not a lot of similarity, except for attempts.

Also, as has already been stated, MKG's shot has always looked severely broken, while A. Gordon's has not.

You claim I haven't addressed his conference play, but I already did in post #42. Framer and others have also expounded on this.




im sure even you will conceed MKG is a better free throw shooter, right? overall im seeing alot of similarities here... enlighten me on how they are completely different, im not seeing it

And you are a lone wolf. What serious scouts are comparing A. Gordon to MKG? Your similarities are based on basic stats, which don't tell us much as I have already shown with my Parker: Bennett comparison, and a grasping at straws approach to citing scouting reports for similar catch phrases.

If you don't see the difference, it's because you are choosing not to, ... and that's your right.
 
PG_AB, when you respond to this this time, please make sure your thoughts are quotable, otherwise you won't be getting a response from me.
 
You could just copy and paste you know?

I am on an Ipad. Copying and pasting is redundant. It takes a while to edit out all of my responses, and just leave his. He can respond normally. He doesn't need to respond within my quoted text.

Referencing his second to last post directed at me.
 
your going to use 1 stat... PER... to try and disprove the similarities i brought up in;

age,positional questions, highschool rank, projected draft position, fg%, rebounding rate, defensive ability, workethic, bbiq, passing ability, steal rate, block rate, wingspan, standing reach, transition scoring, hands ... etc

why are you trying to say i dont see the difference, i said obviously with any player comparison not everythings going to be totally identical something thats gone way over your head while getting defensive. Ive outlined the differences, FT%, 3pt%, 1¼" height in shoes, 3" in vertical, MKG sprints alittle faster... its not really all that much

your argument is weak as ****, sorry


Parker and Bennett's PER being equal proves your point somehow??

MKG's Per 21.4 Gordon's 20.4 ... yet another similarity

if they were so different you should be able to come up with a nice sized list of things Aaron Gordon can do that MKG cant

your also putting a ton of words in my mouth(i didnt watch him play? i watched him plenty and i posted the "aaron gordon is not human" video of on this site in 2012...) im not 'insinuating' anything about more attempts, what kind of **** are you fabricating to make this argument LOL

Aaron Gordons 3pt shooting was awful in conference play... you wont even accept that as fact, though he shot 17% over an 18 game stretch

anyway good luck to you and aaron gordon and this thread, ive had enough.
 
thats what i said? i came in this thread and wrote 'Im convinced A Gordon's player comparison is MKG' ???

the main reasons you hear people wanting Gordon over Vonleh are things like, BBIQ, Defense, Passing, Attitude... Kidd-Gilchrist had all of those in spades coming out of UK but that didnt prevent him from being what looks like a bust in just 2 seasons

is what i wrote. obviously this guy is reading what he wants to read at this point, im out of this thread. just wanted to point out how SF is twisting words
 
This is MKG's shot:

12DnXd.AuSt.79.jpg


That ain't being fixed. There is simply no comparison to that and how Gordon shoots.
 
For those who are Gordon or Vonleh fans, I think that is the direction Lindsey may be headed. This was a very good interview (link below). I think it's telling that he mentions there being some great prospects beyond the top-4, some that may develop into very good players. Several times he mentions doing what is best for the "long-term" interests of the Jazz. Also has been telling prospects in interviews not to expect a starting role right away. Interesting observation that interviews don't influence who to take, but they may remove a prospect from consideration.

Also said he has been busy attending workouts since the lottery. So even though we haven't had anyone show up in SLC, they have been looking at potential draft picks,


https://kfanav.s3.amazonaws.com/20140523_052314_dennis-lindsey-WEB.mp3
 
Gordon apparently has serious interest from Philly. He may not be around for us to draft at all. He's hard to peg, for sure. A lot of folks on this board are seriously under rating him. Others are overhyping him. But seems that several GMs are high on him.
 
Gordon apparently has serious interest from Philly. He may not be around for us to draft at all. He's hard to peg, for sure. A lot of folks on this board are seriously under rating him. Others are overhyping him. But seems that several GMs are high on him.

Link?

(and yeah, it's really difficult to peg Gordon)
 
How fun would this lineup be to watch?

Trey Burke
Alec Burks
Aaron Gordon
Jeremy Evans
Derrick Favors

If I'm the opposing team I just clog the paint. No shooting, puke. Gordon's lack of offensive game has me very worried.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top