haha Sexual Favors is a bit delusional. great stuff, care to predict Aaron Gordons rookie stats??
No. That is pointless. It all depends on situation, role, and minutes. Too many variables to go off of.
patting youself on the back about refuting the MKG comparison is just beyond absurd, i already pointed out a list of basic stats from their freshman years that are identical.
Yes, and the keyword here is "basic." Furthermore, I also responded by pointing out that Anthony Bennett and Jabari Parker have near identical PER 40's, and are both projected tweeners. Does this mean Jabari will be Anthony Bennett? I don't think so. A lot of players share basic stats. So what?
both are 18 at the time of the draft, and we're talked about about as top 5 players coming out of HS and going into the draft, similar positional (both played 3 and 4 in college) and shooting questions surround both players
And you think this makes them the same player?
MKG really could not shoot. He shot 25% from 3.
Gordon shot 35% from 3. A 10% difference at that range is all the difference in the world.
MKG's shot NEVER looked right. He doesn't even have consistent form. Sometimes he brings it back behind his head. Others times his shoulders and arms are crooked. Gordon's looks consistent and a lot purer. Could he he have more touch? Absolutely. But should we be MKG scared? No way in hell.
And are you really comparing the depth of the 2012 draft to the 2014 draft? Just because they were projected as a similar rank coming out of high school is irrelevant. The classes are two different beasts with different depth at each position.
similar reputations for "intangibles", lockdown defense and for being above average rebounders, both are dynamic in transition but not so much in halfcourt offense.
Kidd-Gilchrist has an excellent feel for the game, which shows up in the way he moves intelligently without the ball, as well as with his passing skills, which are very well developed considering his age.
from a dx scouting report before the draft. that sounds like whats said about Gordon, no?
Similar praise, but because it wasn't completely true for one, it makes it false for another? Or something to be scared of? I'm not sure What point you're trying to make with this wrap around logic. Players bust all the time. Are you saying that any player with defensive skills and an ability to pass is automatically a bust? That is obviously untrue.
SF said completely different bodies completely different skills, id disagree on both counts
Aaron Gordon's standing reach 8'9" MKG's 8'8½", Wingspans are within ¼", MKG's 12 lbs heavier, similar sized hands
MKG is 6'5.75" w/o shoes and 6'7.5" w/ them.Gordon is 6'7.5 w/o shoes and 6'8.75" w/o them. Or, 6'9" w/ MKG's shoes
This is the NBA. Height really matters.
Also, MKG had a body fat % of 7.0, compared to A. Gordon's 5.1
Gordon is ripped, and his torso makes the V shape which allows for more upper body strength, while MKG's shoulders are more in line with his hips.
Again, the height differential is huge. The frames are different, in favor of Gordon's more pronounced V, and A. Gordon either takes better care of his body, or has a naturally more athletic body, as evidenced by his better body fat %. These things add up, and they matter greatly.
im sure in your estimation Gordon is a much better athlete but the difference is certainly marginal by almost all measurables, for all the faults of MKG's first few years hes certainly had some monster dunks. combine testing showed Gordon has slightly more vertical and better lane agility
Slightly more vertical? Aaron Gordon had 39" compared to MKG's 35.5" . A. Gordon and his people claim he underjumped as well. They say his personal best is 42".
But let's say A. Gordon's vertical is really 39". And he stands 6'9" in MKG's shoes as already proven. When he is rising to the hoop, he is rising a full 5" higher than MKG. That is a very big difference. If he really does jump 42", then the difference is 8".
your main points are a 2" height difference, i see only a 1¼" difference in shoes, which is what basketball is played in.
https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Michael-Kidd-Gilchrist-5707/
https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Michael-Kidd-Gilchrist-5707/
^ MKG is 6'5.7" w/o shoes
https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Aaron-Gordon-6458/
https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Aaron-Gordon-6458/
^ A, Gordon is 6'7.5" w/o them.
Your argument is basketball is played in shoes? So it doesn't matter how high the sole is? Preposterous. A. Gordon could just as easily buy bigger shoes to inflate his height. Measuring w/o shoes tells you the truth.
After looking at the data again, I see I posted it wrong the first time. A. Gordon is 1.75" taller.
a turnover ratio that hasn't translated into an issue for MKG in the pros',
Really? You don't think having a 12.5% TO rate, which is markedly worse than the league average, is a big deal to his and his team's success? Admittedly, he is faring better than the 17.3% he got up to in college, but to say it isn't affecting him would be untrue.
and 3point shooting based on 45 attempts without ofcourse acknowledging him shooting 3/17 in 18 conference games, also MKG conference 3pt shooting 2/16... yet another similarity
His shooting has already been discussed by myself, framer, phippsj, and multiple others who actually watched him play.
It's already been said that it would've been nice to see him shoot more, but it wasn't in Arizona's offense for him because of who they already had, and where they needed him on the court. When he shot a 3, it was due to a broken play. 35.6% on broken plays is probably pretty good.
You're insinuating that Aaron's 3pt% would've gone down had he shot more, but one could also assume it could've gone up if the plays were designed for him.
At the end of the day, A. Gordon's 35.6% on 45 attempted 3's is still 10% better than MkG's 25.5% on 51 attempts. Not a lot of similarity, except for attempts.
Also, as has already been stated, MKG's shot has always looked severely broken, while A. Gordon's has not.
You claim I haven't addressed his conference play, but I already did in post #42. Framer and others have also expounded on this.
im sure even you will conceed MKG is a better free throw shooter, right? overall im seeing alot of similarities here... enlighten me on how they are completely different, im not seeing it
And you are a lone wolf. What serious scouts are comparing A. Gordon to MKG? Your similarities are based on basic stats, which don't tell us much as I have already shown with my Parker: Bennett comparison, and a grasping at straws approach to citing scouting reports for similar catch phrases.
If you don't see the difference, it's because you are choosing not to, ... and that's your right.