True story.
While Corbin has been somewhat more proactive than the veterans-get-preference-no-matter-what-our-team-needs-and no-matter-the-team-performance philosophy of Ol' Jer, this move-Hayward-to-the-2 shift came--like many other adjustments--as a response to injury rather than sound strategy and experimentation. I wish that the coaching staff would more thoroughly analyze what players and combinations work best BEFORE it becomes expedient to do so.
Bell has notched up in his performance since those dismal first few games, but Hayward-Howard is likely a better combo to start, with Bell-Miles bringing a good defense-offense mix off the bench. I simply don't understand how Bell gets such a free pass for minutes; he can be a "team leader" at least as effectively--perhaps more so--on the sidelines.
82 games is no perfect measure (not that any such system exists), but Bell ranks dead last in net individual player production vs. his opponent--and dead last overall on the team in a mixed rating of individual and team impact.
https://www.82games.com/1112/1112UTA.HTM
I want to see what a starting lineup of Tinsley-Hayward-Howard-Millsap-Jefferson (or Kanter) can do. If they give up too many points, then put Bell back in as a starter--or sub him in earlier.