What's new

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

If one wants to waste enough
time, one can find plenty of examples of anything. Twitter is not a good sample of real life. I’m not denying the existence of idiots, I’m denying they’re the majority.

I mean, I could post examples of Louis Farrakhan and his followers on twitters, the DNC hosted Linda Sarsour who is pretty anti-Semitic. Look at how many major democratic candidates have come for Farrakhan’s approval, advice, etc.

By Thriller’s logic, that is and should be disqualifying. Or maybe, just maybe, both sides have their fair share of idiots.
When the DNC hosted linda sarsour did the crowd chant hitlers name? Post some twitter links of prominent democrats and their followers cheering for nazis or russians or the chinese or communists or something.
Thriller was able to easily and quickly finds lots of evidence. Maybe both sides have their fair share of idiots but maybe just one side seems to really be loud and celebratory about their idiots while also not condemning them ever. Thriller makes a good point about MTG and Trump not suffering consequences for their actions from their own party but their own party was quick to ostracize and censure cheney, kinzinger, and romney basically because they didn't like trump.

Are there any democrats being censured because they dont like AOC or Biden or Bernie or anything?
 
I agree that one, there are people on the right, many of them directly connected to the Republican Party who support Putin, and two, that Putin support is not generally part of the Republican Party's platform.

I think these criticisms should be directed at individuals and not the Republican Party in general.
I might’ve agreed with this in 2015-2016. Maybe just maybe after. But not after Mueller. Not after Helsinki. And especially not after that first impeachment. That was so beyond the pale. Blackmailing Ukraine, holding up much needed military aid to defend itself against Putin, in exchange for dirt on Biden. And every Republican with the exception of Romney said, “we good with this.” And then the 2020 election, more republicans than before, saw all the pro Russian ******** and said, “hell Yah, we want 4 more years of this.”

To me, the conservatives who had principle and character, like @colton have already left/been ostracized.

We need a healthy conservative party. But the current Republican Party isn’t it. And IMO, the overwhelming pro putin rhetoric and Russian-esque authoritarianism (blackmailing Ukraine, asking Russia for help, Jan 6, Fox News lying, LGBT/African American book banning, voter suppression, etc) should compel us to create one by voting for Democrats for the next few election cycles. Seriously, send the GOP into the wilderness until 2026 and I think we’ll find a healthy and diverse party. One that competes for voters, not one suppresses them. One that stands up to Russia, not one that calls Putin genius for invading Ukraine.
 
Last edited:
I know @RandyForRubio doesnt think he’s the GOP’s leader. But this is happening RIGHT NOW at CPAC (again, if he isn’t their leader why is he their main speaker tonight?). Btw, McConnell, Pence, and Kemp weren’t invited/didn’t attend. If they’re the real leaders of the party, why wouldn’t they be at CPAC?

 
I know @RandyForRubio doesnt think he’s the GOP’s leader. But this is happening RIGHT NOW at CPAC (again, if he isn’t their leader why is he their main speaker tonight?). Btw, McConnell, Pence, and Kemp weren’t invited/didn’t attend. If they’re the real leaders of the party, why wouldn’t they be at CPAC?


Trump is just the worst.
 
Trump is just the worst.
He’s a ****ing *******.

Now he’s trying to take credit for Ukraine’s ability to fight back. He’s saying that they’re using his javelins to defeat Russian tanks. The same weapons he threatened to withhold until they helped dig up dirt on Biden.
 
At this point, you're harassing another poster. Give it a rest.
Really? You think so? That’s harassing? Okay. I apologize. I didn’t think so. I thought his take was pretty silly especially given the evidence. but if it’s offensive or counter productive then I’ll gladly give it a rest.
 
Dinesh D’Souza today. He’s a top authors and filmmakers on the right and regularly appears on Fox News. Almost 2 million followers on Twitter. Is he an outlier?

 
Dinesh D’Souza today. He’s a top authors and filmmakers on the right and regularly appears on Fox News. Almost 2 million followers on Twitter. Is he an outlier?


Grizzly Bears live in North America, first of all.

Second, I think you're supposed to have Putin buy you dinner first before you put out like that.
 
Steve Bannon a few days ago. Is he influential? Former Trump campaign manager and top podcasters in the nation, does he represent anything in the right?

https://newrepublic.com/article/165489/right-wing-media-putin-ukraine

How about Candace Owens? She’s a Fox News regular and interviewed trump just a few weeks ago. She has 3 million followers.



How about the Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh? He’s blaming… trans people for… something? Again, the Putin admiration because he’s awful to the LGBT community and is seen a leader of white nationalist Christianity is nauseating.


And I just couldn’t help putting this here. @Gameface do you understand balls? Actually listen to the clip lol
 
Really? You think so? That’s harassing? Okay. I apologize. I didn’t think so. I thought his take was pretty silly especially given the evidence. but if it’s offensive or counter productive then I’ll gladly give it a rest.
You know what? This was ******** on my part.

@Gameface you were right to drag my *** here. You could’ve gone harder and I probably deserved it.

@RandyForRubio i owe you a lot better apology than the last few posts I’ve written. This was ******** on my part and I really feel bad for digging in. It was unprofessional, petty, immature, and just dumb. We can disagree without being disagreeable and I definitely crossed that line. I probably need to take a mental break for a bit
 
All I can say is that if Russia invaded the US with a Democrat in the White House, there sure would be a lot of collaborationists.
 
You don't need to @ him in a dozen or so posts. Yes, I do think it is harassing.
Yep. One reason I have certain posters on ignore. It's that religious fervor (they can call it politics but it comes across much more strongly as religion than politics).
 
Back
Top