RandyForRubio
Well-Known Member
Are you being deliberately obtuse?
I take it you've never conversed with Thriller before.
Are you being deliberately obtuse?
There's a HUGE difference between allowing students to read something, and REQUIRING them to read something. Those were all in my school library. Huck Finn was REQUIRED, and contains the n-word. It was not required of 8th graders, it was required of 11th or 12th graders (can't recall which). Our teacher told us why he was requiring it, and warned us that the n-word was used, much like it sounds like this junior high teacher did. The difference is age and maturity of the students, 8th graders compared to 11th or 12th graders.
Jumping from my opinion that a movie with the n-word not be REQUIRED of 8th graders, to a suggestion that I'm in favor of banning all books for all students, is despicable.
I take it you've never conversed with Thriller before.
You would be hard pressed to find a middle school in Utah that doesn't have the PG version of this movie. Clearly, this was the version he was showing, not the rated R.
I feel like I'm piling on. You're a good guy Colton. But you're completely in the dark.
The state of Utah has a requirement for educators to provide parents with a list of movies they are going to show that are above a G rating. Teachers will then include this list and permission slip typically at the start of the year usually in their disclosure.
Students who don't Return this slip cannot legally watch these movies. Alt assignments are then Provided.
Legally, teachers in k-12 cannot require students to watch any movie that their parent/child objects to.
Rated R movies are forbidden, regardless of permission slips.
So clearly, this was the PG version and most likely this veteran teachers got the required permission slips.
If this parent/student had an objection about the movie, discussion, or assignment, they could have requested an alt assignment. No teacher would object to giving a student a textbook assignment in the library rather than having their name dragged through the mud for $30k.
Teachers don't mess around when it comes to those disclosures haha
Clearly? So you're saying it was rated PG despite having the word ****** in it? And that's clear to you?
Get your facts straight about k-12 education in Utah before you debate with me. If you feel like the policy I've stated is wrong, inform me. But if ad hominem attacks are all you can use, then you've already lost.
They don't. All middle schools that I've worked in (3 districts) require the disclosures to be over viewed and approved by dept heads and administrators.
Movie listings are part of these. In fact, I don't know of a single teacher who doesn't have a movie list. From health to social studies.
Pepsi Cola donated thousands of copies of this movie edited for k-12 education. All districts in Utah have access to this movie and all schools that I've worked with have had a copy specifically to be used in 8th grade.
You're free to believe that this teacher and elected school board member broke Utah law and showed an unauthorized R rated version of this movie. Which would easily result in stiff disciplinary action from his school (possible termination) and possible loss of his elected position on the board.
Or, you can believe that he used one of the thousands of edited copies donated to his district/school.
Care to place some money on which one of us is right?
I feel like I'm piling on. You're a good guy Colton. But you're completely in the dark.
The state of Utah has a requirement for educators to provide parents with a list of movies they are going to show that are above a G rating. Teachers will then include this list and permission slip typically at the start of the year usually in their disclosure.
Students who don't Return this slip cannot legally watch these movies. Alt assignments are then Provided.
Legally, teachers in k-12 cannot require students to watch any movie that their parent/child objects to.
So basically he violated two policies:
* He used the n word
* he didn't include the movie on his movie list. A surprising oversight I'll admit. But certainly nothing worthy of termination.
In all seriousness, how many of you would've been offended by me having those flags placed on a table as props during those units? I never thought that people might be offended by them. It's not like they were flown or pledged to. They were used as props. The days I had the Nazi flag out it was used as part table cloth for the WWII and holocaust books I had on the table for the students to see and even check out if desired.
I thought I was being a good educator, not a selfish racist trying to make kids feel Uncomfortable.
* he didn't include the movie on his movie list. A surprising oversight I'll admit. But certainly nothing worthy of termination.
I have a question about this one. I obviously don't know how things work in Utah, but here in Alberta, we have a provincial curriculum which provides you with a list of pre-approved texts for say, English Lit classes. Texts here nowadays very explicitly includes movies, too. Now, the curriculum says this is simply a list of recommended texts, but a teacher can feel free to teach other things, using their judgement.
The pre-approved list is bulletproof, though. You absolutely cannot be questioned on showing anything on that list, as long as it's recommended for the given grade. If parents have issues, it is their job to look at the list(freely available online) and figure out if they have a beef with anything. There are no forms sent home to be signed or anything like that. If you have an issue with a text, it is your responsibility to inquire into whether the teacher is teaching it and ask that your kid be given an alternative assignment. If you fail to do that ahead of time and the book or the movie is on the pre-approved list, your kid is going to read/watch it.
So, what I'm trying to say her is that I'm unclear on whether there is such a master list in Utah. I know this is Social Studies and not English, but do you have to get prior approval for something that is explicitly part of the curriculum?
Also, I'm pretty sure when I've shown Shawshank Redemption, which is nearly mandatory for grade 11 students, it was the version that played in theatres.
Not sure who you're directing this to, but no one here has expressed offense at that type of thing. Seems reasonable to me. And no one has called you a selfish racist.
I never called for his termination.
But still, not including the movie in his movie list and requiring students to watch it without an opt-out (which violates the "students who don't return the slip cannot legally watch the movies" policy you quoted), and using the n-word repeatedly in class, are not behaviors appropriate for 8th grade teaching, I guess we all agree. If he had followed protocol then we wouldn't be having this thread.