You know I respect your opinions, but you are pushing the HOPE button pretty hard. I think some of the gloss you give to China, S. America, India, and Africa is very debatable. And, it's possible that these environmental corrections will be remembered as somebody sweeping while the floodwaters were on their way.
Again, dickwad, I didn't come out against ALL RETAIL FOREVER AMEN, okay? And, since we are talking about sugarhouse, you should measure that against the likes of City Creek.... you'll see some important differences.
Yet global poverty declined in real terms for the first time in 2010. ... How hard will political capital be to come by when farmers in the republican center have thirsty crops?
I haven't followed SLC politics for a while now, but I think your percentages and voting patterns are off.
There is no question that the State is heavily Mormon (as is any area outside of SLC proper). And, there is no question that State authority will be wielded when certain interests in the city need them to come to the rescue.
Can you explain what worries you the most on the environmental front and how it relates to your issues with endless growth? The way I see it is the closer we get to scarcity the more we will do something about it, and you should theoretically be in favor of that.
https://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytim...on-voters-raise-romneys-advantage-in-arizona/
A article talking about the Mormon voting history in Las Vegas. The %s I used were completely made up to emphasize my point. Mormons as far as any article I have seen seem to vote in larger numbers than non members. Given the high percentage of Mormons in Utah (especially in southern Utah) it is no wonder that a large portion of the state legislature is Mormon.
to your point, there is plenty of political apathy amongst non-Mormons in SLC. I can't say I blame them. Can you?
This is part of the landscaped architectural dream that goes all the way back to building Zion. Everything in its right place. Salt Lake City, "a city of sprinklers." I think this has a lot more to do with sheer Mormon power/will and their particular imaginations about manicuring space.
I'm pretty surprised that this comment didn't spark some kind of counter-attack.
I'm pretty surprised that this comment didn't spark some kind of counter-attack.
I see no reason it should. Mormon society in general tends to be well organized. Pushing that onto the cities they have founded and built does not suprise me.
There have been a couple of statements along the lines of Mormon rights to transform the landscape of a city they "founded." You all know they weren't the first people to utilize that space, right?
And you know this how? Thanks for jumping to stupid conclusions.In other words, Trout can send you a PM with specific physical threats and not receive even a yellow card.
Thanks, mods, for running a stupid ship.
Just the most assertive.
And you know this how? Thanks for jumping to stupid conclusions.
There have been a couple of statements along the lines of Mormon rights to transform the landscape of a city they "founded."
General enough? You're a smart guy, NAOS. You know there are a lot of mormons, or others who are (at least situationally) sympathetic to them, on this board. Do comments of that nature surprise you?
Ultimately, the church pulls a lot of political weight in SLC. If they want something done, it usually gets done. Generally (and I'm almost positive you'll have some argument for this) the church strives to consider the interests of the community, along with their own.
I'm certainly not part of the "If you don't like it, leave" crowd (much too much of that attitude amongst members). To be honest, I'd love to see Utah's mormon population drop below 50%, for a couple of reasons. But as it stands, that isn't the case. So, mormon interests will continue to dominate.