Unwillingly...
Point?
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk
See the Andrews thread. She didn't suffer financially but got damages.Point?
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk
But if a private conversation is what lead to him losing the team...It's not his right to own an nba team.
Well he was made to sell it, a punishment of sort, but Hogan did the same thing according to you and he was awarded large sums of money.
Had he held onto the Clippers for 5-10 more years it could have been worth $3billion. So he is forgoing potential profit the same way as Hogan did with the sponsorship.
Yes
Well he was made to sell it, a punishment of sort, but Hogan did the same thing according to you and he was awarded large sums of money.
Had he held onto the Clippers for 5-10 more years it could have been worth $3billion. So he is forgoing potential profit the same way as Hogan did with the sponsorship.
Sounds like that would be hard to prove in court.
No it won't be hard to prove at all. In 2007 (about 10 years ago), the Clippers were worth $285 million (according to Forbes), now it's worth $2 billion, so that's an increase of $1,715 billion or 701% over the course the the last 10 years.
It would be easy for the jury to see that the Clippers would be worth AT LEAST $3billion by 2026.
https://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/32/biz_06nba_NBA-Team-Valuations_Value.html
But if a private conversation is what lead to him losing the team...
Hogan doesn't have a right to endorsement deals, either.
But sterling was not involved in a legal case. At any rate, he definitely could have sued hus girlfriend for all she was worth and won.
Buck-O-fiveBut sterling was not involved in a legal case. At any rate, he definitely could have sued hus girlfriend for all she was worth and won.
Pretty muchBecause markets increase all the time without ever falling?