gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
They are +51 in 21 minutes? Holy hell we need to see that lineup for 20+ minutes for a few games. We would be blowing everybody off of the floor.In 21 minutes only. Too small sample size.

They are +51 in 21 minutes? Holy hell we need to see that lineup for 20+ minutes for a few games. We would be blowing everybody off of the floor.In 21 minutes only. Too small sample size.
How's your one track mind doing today Foggy?
Skip. Skip.
How's your one track mind doing today Foggy?
What makes the lineups so tough to work out is that Millsap and Marvin are the only guys on the team with size that can defend the perimeter. Something we are still waiting on with Favs just like Kanter's post offense.
Also the +/- stuff reinforces, it seems, my opinion that closing games with Marvin on the floor would improve the team more than any other one thing lineup-wise. He really helps the rebounding problem in particular.
I logged on the forum this morning to make this exact same post. It's very strange to me that everyone around the league (fans included) knows that Favors & Kanter both deserve more playing time. Why do the Jazz not realize this? Sure, Ty Corbin is ultimately responsible for how much PT these guys get every night, but Dennis Lindsey has to be watching these games and thinking it's time to trade Millsap or Jefferson, just so Corbin has to play Derrick and Enes more often. Kanter posts a positive +/- against Memphis, shoots perfect from the field and the line, and ends up with a team low 14 minutes. It's unfathomable to explain some of the rotation and coaching decisions from Ty.
It's a wild and grand conspiracy, but are the Jazz purposefully limiting Favors & Kanters minutes so they can resign them for $8-10 mil/year instead of $13-14? I highly doubt it, but there is no other logical explanation for what is going on. The fact that Hayward has played about 30 minutes a game for a year or two pretty much kills the idea, but he also plays at a position where we are relatively thin on talent.
I just have an awful feeling that we are going to alienate the future face(s) of our franchise if they don't see much playing time during their rookie deal. The Jazz front office seems to be content miring in mediocrity.
Yeah. There's a reason they're called stretch 4's. Everyone was freaking out when Favors wasn't put in to guard Ryan Anderson. It was an obvious move by CoTy but the JF usuals called for his head regardless. Jefferson and Kanter sure as hell can't guard a stretch 4, and Favors will struggle every time while not making them pay equally on the offensive end.
I think you were the one who made a point about Marvin closing games in another thread. To that, I like Carroll in their at the three as well. Anything but a Hayward-Foye combination is good, with the possible exception of Foye guarding another combo guard with Haywad on a small 3.
Here's another idea for a 'Plan behind all of this' for all you hardcore optimists out there.
This season is an audition season. We're just trying to see who's going to fit with our young core from next year on out. This idea makes sense because most of the non-core players are on the last year of their contract this year.