Any thoughts on if this signals that the Jazz are tanking again this year?
We are going to not only overpay this pathetic scrub this year, but also next year as well - 3.5 mil wasted. And for what - a 2nd round pick? This makes no sense at all. If we are taking 7 mil worth of garbage on our books, there had better be at least a first round pick involved. Seems like a pretty bad move for DL.
I get the feeling there like aren't many first rounders being floated for 3 million in salary relief.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];863636 said:In my opinion, this trade shouldn't be getting anybody excited. Novak is a "keep-gettin-dem-checks" kind of guy. I hope they know he's a good locker-room presence, because that'll be his biggest influence on the team's performance.
The only point of this trade that piques my interest is the clear signal it sends about our relationship to the three-point line. That's nice.
*shrug* Jazz signed Kyle Korver when Sloan was still the coach.
Not that I'm pro-tanking but, is it worth tanking this season? Asking because, I don't know much about the 2015 draft class and I hope we are done with tanking.
And? Are you responding to what I said or just hitting the reply button?
*shrug* Jazz signed Kyle Korver when Sloan was still the coach.
What more would you liked to have seen us receive in a deal like this?
The Jazz don't "have" to get to the minimum. There is an incentive to not be below the minimum but it's a very small incentive.This was a good pickup that fills some needs.
A veteran spot up 3 point shooter.
Some salary filler. Jazz have to get to the minimum.
Another draft pick.
Can still make some more moves.
Can still keep E Murphy and Thomas.
Thanks for the link but I'm looking for more of the opinions of the JF posters. The board have huge threads about the draft classes and there are folks who follow them closely.
What more would you liked to have seen us receive in a deal like this?
I'm not sure I would like to see a deal like this at all. We don't get anything out of it besides a warm body. If I'm going to get excited about this, it's going to be because we brought back a real asset. I just don't see the point unless the Jazz believe Novak can play (and I personally don't think he can). Marvin is better.
I'm not sure I would like to see a deal like this at all. We don't get anything out of it besides a warm body. If I'm going to get excited about this, it's going to be because we brought back a real asset. I just don't see the point unless the Jazz believe Novak can play (and I personally don't think he can). Marvin is better.