JimLes
Well-Known Member
This is some really expensive meat though.
And it went bad about 3-4 years ago.
This is some really expensive meat though.
IDK, I do think we are understating LaVine's potential impact.I think I'd rather max out George Niang. I don't see this helping anything but maybe getting us to the play-in if everything went right.
How is Markkanen going to get a shot up?LsVine, Sexton, and Lauri are 3 guys who can easily be over 3 OBPM. Your offense would be elite as long as you don't put negatives around them.
Never mind. I didn’t know the Bulls already owe that pick…With his age, the only way I’d do this if I’m the Jazz is getting the Bulls 1st round pick next year unprotected…
Drive and kick. Not like Hendricks/Walker are taking much ball time. Plenty of shots for the big 3 scorersHow is Markkanen going to get a shot up?
The jazz are usually pretty close to the vest with all their trades. I think this is all smoke from the Lavine camp, trying to drive up his value.That contract for 3 years scares me. There has to be more to this trade than we know.
The jazz are usually pretty close to the vest with all their trades. I think this is all smoke from the Lavine camp, trying to drive up his value.
Serious question. Would Jazz fanz prefer Zach Lavine or Miles Bridges for our big game hunting?
So far Boozer is possibly the biggest game we've gotten in at least the last 25 years. I would argue either Lavine or Bridges would be bigger.I don't think either quite qualifies as big game. I like Zach as a player. The contract and injury history are a buzzkill.