What's new
By:

Jazz Offseason Plan

Curious to see what happens in Indiana... it sounds like lots of changes could be out there for them. Warren, Turner, #13, Brogdon have been consistently brought up in trade rumors.
 
LoPo said:
You don't ever look back and think about what we would have been if we had..

kept Crowder and Rubio
then signed Bojan
(instead of trading Crowder, picks and releasing Rubio in order to get Conley)?

Never?
Click to expand...

Never lmao
 
LoPo said:
You don't ever look back and think about what we would have been if we had..

kept Crowder and Rubio
then signed Bojan
(instead of trading Crowder, picks and releasing Rubio in order to get Conley)?

Never?
Click to expand...
I never, ever think about keeping Rubio. He was a bad fit here, period. He is a bad fit most places because it turns out that shooting - the one thing basketball fundamentally is - is really, really important.

He also had hamstring issues.

While we're fantasizing, let's pretend the Jazz signed Jimmy Butler with their cap-space.
 
NUMBERICA said:
I never, ever think about keeping Rubio. He was a bad fit here, period. He is a bad fit most places because it turns out that shooting - the one thing basketball fundamentally is - is really, really important.

He also had hamstring issues.

While we're fantasizing, let's pretend the Jazz signed Jimmy Butler with their cap-space.
Click to expand...
I think about what would've happened if they'd kept Rubio, and the idea has merit, due to a) his size, b) his defense, and c) his coming at 1/3 the price of Conley, plus not costing Crowder, Allen, and two picks. It's a hingsight thing, but it's not a crazy argument.
 
Honestly, I just think Zanick is aggressively calling everyone on everything at this point. Because the rumors are so conflicting and going in every direction. Who knows what they're going to do.

 
campaignist said:
I think about what would've happened if they'd kept Rubio, and the idea has merit, due to a) his size, b) his defense, and c) his coming at 1/3 the price of Conley, plus not costing Crowder, Allen, and two picks. It's a hingsight thing, but it's not a crazy argument.
Click to expand...
Why is Rubio even part of that train of thought, though? Re-signing Rubio was not necessary for the rest of those things to happen. If they couldn't find the right "PG" to pair with Donovan, then just stop delaying what looks inevitable at the end of every season and just make Donovan the "1". Or while we're still fantasizing, use that cap-space to sign Brogdon. And/or sign Caruso when he was in-limbo that offseason.

There are lots of ways we could try to answer the question before coming back what is both familiar and what glaringly didn't work.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Why is Rubio even part of that train of thought, though? Re-signing Rubio was not necessary for the rest of those things to happen. If they couldn't find the right "PG" to pair with Donovan, then just stop delaying what looks inevitable at the end of every season and just make Donovan the "1". Or while we're still fantasizing, use that cap-space to sign Brogdon. And/or sign Caruso when he was in-limbo that offseason.

There are lots of ways we could try to answer the question before coming back what is both familiar and what glaringly didn't work.
Click to expand...
I don't like living in the past, but we were always clamoring for a stretch 4 in place of Favors. If we took that defense first philosophy team and replace Favors with Bojan, we might have had something special.

Rubio, Joe, Crowder, Royce as perimeter defenders. I'm done talking about it, but in hindsight, Rubio and Crowder would have been better than just Mike.

Sent from my SM-G970U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
If Joe is really on the table and it's not because Joe asked them, it's strong evidence this organization is now being run from the top-down by casuals. He is the glue that has consistently held this team together on and off the court during all of the playoff runs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top