Yes, I think you are a dork. And apparently I am not the only one here who thinks that.
gee, now the jazz are back in it. So does taht mean the reffing matters now?
"Dork?" Wound my tender heart with your harsh words.
I don't really care if you think I'm a dork. And I don't care if you're not the only one.
Don't start whining about the refs in Q1 when the Jazz aren't playing like they deserve calls.
The Jazz were down independent of the refs. The Jazz are back in it independent of the refs.
Update: I'm gonna give props to Sloan for more experimentation than usual in finding a combination that works. Deron at the 2 frustrated Kobe some, and although it was interesting to take out Price instead of Watson (Price did have 2 fouls and might be worth preserving for 2H), it put DW in a position where he needed to take responsibility for the Laker's foundational player.
Here's a point for criticism: a late call by the refs, giving DW his 2nd foul. But AK coming in tries to fill in the void, blocking AK but unfortunately committing the foul when KB recovers.
L.A. up 50-46 with half a minute left in Q2, and that score persists until halftime.
We'll take it. 29-17 quarter for Utah. Is the Raja--or the RB + AK wing combo--a weak link?
Clearly there is something wrong with the starting lineup. They start the team off with a deficit in almost every game. As long as substitutions are made quickly, it isn't unrecoverable, but it does make things tough to start out behind.
Nissalke rightfully questioning Phil Jackson's decision to not put back more starters in earlier in Q2.