What if he has a terrible game? Then he could fall. It's risk versus reward. There was very little reward in him playing again. Maybe it makes him the consensus number 1 pick. There was a lot of risk. This decision was a wise one by his agent.
It is going to be risky no matter who we pick at 3. JMO. He didn't play the NHS because his agent told him not to. No more or less.Hence the doubt of his abilities. Look I am not trying to argue if he should play in the NHS or not, but I am amazed how people here are so sure that he is going to be the real deal when he has not played a game in 1.5 years and chose not to play in one when he had a chance. If it is that risky for him to play in an exhibition game, it is so much more risky for the Jazz to spend a 3rd pick on him.
I like both players but I have to wonder who is more injury prone?
JV is a big skinny dude and from Europe. The Jazz have had trouble with skinny players and European players staying injury free.
Kanter had worries about his knees. They checked out fine at the Draft combine but that still doesn't settle the matter. Big guys like him tend to have knee trouble or feet or both.
Seems to me that Knight is probably the safest pick for Jazz. That would mean they might as well trade down to 4 and pick up another asset to get him, depending on who wants Kanter and how the draft plays out, 1-2.
You don't ever win anything playing it safe though. The Jazz have to aim for superstar potential now that Deron is gone.
I really don't know why so many people think Kanter is the clearcut BPA at #3. Knight improved significantly throughout the NCAA season and I don't see why he won't do the same as he progresses in the NBA.
The NBA potential of Jonas Valanciunas
June, 8, 2011
Jun 8
12:16
PM ET
Comments6
By Fran Fraschilla
This is an NBA draft that is devoid of big men, so Lithuania's 7-foot, 245-pound 19-year-old, Jonas Valanciunas, has a lot of interest from teams in the lottery. At his age, there is no doubting his intriguing potential, but expecting him to help a team right away is unrealistic.
More critically for teams in position to select him is projecting where Valanciunas' game will be five years from now. It is not inconceivable to some NBA personnel that he could be the best player in this draft by then -- of course the risk is that the NBA executive that drafts him could be fired by then.
You don't ever win anything playing it safe though. The Jazz have to aim for superstar potential now that Deron is gone.
Valanciunas over Vesely if it comes down to that, but Kanter still two steps above both.
Thanks guys. I think this info is valuable.
Also, this is Koufos' numbers from when he was in the 2007 U18 Euro campionship:
COMPARISON
K. Koufos (GRE)
PPG.......26,5
RPG.......13
ORPG.......3,2
DRPG.......9,8
ASPG.......0,4
FG2P%...57,8%
FG3P%.....9,1%
FT%.......59%
Initially I scoffed when some compared Kanter's numbers to Koufos. But here they are. Very comparable at this level of competition - and look how Koufos has dominated the NBA. I'm getting more uncomfortable with Kanter. But does Valanciunas make me feel any more secure?
Both Koufus and Kanter have/had enough talent to be very good players. What Kanter has going for him is that he is really fluid and he appears to be a very hard worker. The latter is one of the most important things for a professional athlete. You can't teach it and Koufus didn't have it.