What's new

Lockout!!!

You really overestimate these guys if you think someone telling them about a possible strike last year had much effect.

These are kids, most of whom were dirt poor before they got rich overnight. That formula leads to bad choices 9 times out of 10.

...true dat! Anyone who would slap tattoo's on their body from the top of their head to the bottom of their soles, can't be much on thinkin!
 
"Filing for bankruptcy is a long-standing tradition for NBA players, 60% of whom, according to the Toronto Star, are broke five years after they retire."

https://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/story?id=3469271

Literally the first thing that popped up. Sure there's lots more.

.....GREAT READ! You left out some of the highlights, though! "Filing for bankruptcy is a long-standing tradition for NBA players, 60% of whom, according to the Toronto Star, are broke five years after they retire. The other 40% deliver the Toronto Star." "Guys go broke because they surround themselves with people who help them go broke," says ex-NBA center Danny Schayes." (I suspect he's talking about "homies!")
 
I may have missed it in this thread but I heard on the radio an idea I know I mentioned months back and others probably have as well and it is was have a tier or staged cap and even more importantly put a limit on how many years a team could go over the cap.

Also thanks I did enjoy the article's opinion and the ideas in it even more.
 
Bill Simmons is the best writer ESPN has by far.

Simmons could solve this thing in 30 minutes. If both sides were smart they'd sub him in for Cohen and get this thing done by the end of the week. And while we're discussing Simmons, I have no idea why Stern hasn't adopted his "Entertaining-As-Hell Tournament".
 
Simmons could solve this thing in 30 minutes. If both sides were smart they'd sub him in for Cohen and get this thing done by the end of the week. And while we're discussing Simmons, I have no idea why Stern hasn't adopted his "Entertaining-As-Hell Tournament".

Simmons wouldn't be able to handle the various egos well at all.

If you think either owners or star players want to be dictated to by a sportswriter then I'd suggest you reimagine how that interaction would go down.

For what it's worth, my read of the Simmons column is that he thinks the "fair" solution is a lot more concessions by players on issues beyond BRI.
 
Simmons can go to hell and the owners can go to hell. Simmons keep referring to the writers strike. But there are two important differences.

1) the first was a strike, this was a lockout. The players have already offered to make concessions from the status quo, which is beyond generous, the writers wanted concessions

2) the players have talent, and as a result have some leverage. The writers are no-talent hacks lots of people can do what they did. So they had no leverage.


i hope the players start their own league with nike...they can probably make 33% of their current salaries, and what they lose in income they can make up for in equity in the new league. David stern and the owners can eat a ****, this is highway robbery.

The executive class in this country has lost their ****ing minds.
 
Last edited:
Simmons can go to hell and the owners can go to hell. Simmons keep referring to the writers strike. But there are two important differences.

1) the first was a strike, this was a lockout. The players have already offered to make concessions from the status quo, which is beyond generous, the writers wanted concessions

2) the players have talent, and as a result have some leverage. The writers are no-talent hacks lots of people can do what they did. So they had no leverage.


i hope the players start their own league with nike...they can probably make 33% of their current salaries, and what they lose in income they can make up for in equity in the new league. David stern and the owners can eat a dick, this is highway robbery.

The executive class in this country has lost their ****ing minds.

I was wondering how you put up a 4-rep in so few posts. Now I know.
 
It was inevitable that a 3rd party was going to have be brought in on this. The two sides would never have seen eye to eye because they are looking at this from two different perspectives. The owners have had their a$$es handed to them the last two CBAs (current standings Hunter 2, Stern 0). The players want to negotiate off of the last CBA, whereas the owners don't want to even look at the last CBA and want to blow the whole thing up making up for all their previous "concessions" in one fell swoop. I assume in most CBA negotations it is proper to go off previous CBAs so I think the owners are being too heavy-handed. They want everything they've given up back in this new CBA, but for everyone's sake it may be best to strike a deal where the players make a decent amount of concessions (but not all), and then they'll have to wait for the next CBA to expire to make up the rest.
 
Simmons wouldn't be able to handle the various egos well at all.

If you think either owners or star players want to be dictated to by a sportswriter then I'd suggest you reimagine how that interaction would go down.

For what it's worth, my read of the Simmons column is that he thinks the "fair" solution is a lot more concessions by players on issues beyond BRI.

I think you took my post a little to literally. I'm just saying that I think Simmons is really close on what the deal is going to look like. Do the players end up giving up a lot more than they'd like? Yes, but sooner or later they're going to have to if they want to play. The owners are in this to win this time. They may give in on one or two things, but this new CBA will greatly favor the owners regardless, so why not get it over with.
 
I have probably 4000 posts over the last 8 years... not sure what happened to the postcounts... Havent been on here much lately though.

....I, as you may well be aware of......led this board in posts by a large margin until it was merged or combined with another board and the count started over! I had a larger lead than Stockton has on career steals and career assists!
 
....I, as you may well be aware of......led this board in posts by a large margin until it was merged or combined with another board and the count started over! I had a larger lead than Stockton has on career steals and career assists!

I, as you may well be aware don't care about your post count.... I do wish you would stop trolling this fan forum altogether though.
 
Simmons can go to hell and the owners can go to hell. Simmons keep referring to the writers strike. But there are two important differences.

1) the first was a strike, this was a lockout. The players have already offered to make concessions from the status quo, which is beyond generous, the writers wanted concessions

2) the players have talent, and as a result have some leverage. The writers are no-talent hacks lots of people can do what they did. So they had no leverage.


i hope the players start their own league with nike...they can probably make 33% of their current salaries, and what they lose in income they can make up for in equity in the new league. David stern and the owners can eat a ****, this is highway robbery.

The executive class in this country has lost their ****ing minds.
Hi Kobe.
 
....I, as you may well be aware of......led this board in posts by a large margin until it was merged or combined with another board and the count started over! I had a larger lead than Stockton has on career steals and career assists!
Are there seriously people in this world who are retarded enough to think that having the most posts on an internet message board is a noteworthy accomplishment?
 
Are there seriously people in this world who are retarded enough to think that having the most posts on an internet message board is a noteworthy accomplishment?

Obviously.........

"....I, as you may well be aware of......led this board in posts by a large margin until it was merged or combined with another board and the count started over! I had a larger lead than Stockton has on career steals and career assists!"

-Carolinajazz
 
Simmons can go to hell and the owners can go to hell. Simmons keep referring to the writers strike. But there are two important differences.

1) the first was a strike, this was a lockout. The players have already offered to make concessions from the status quo, which is beyond generous, the writers wanted concessions

2) the players have talent, and as a result have some leverage. The writers are no-talent hacks lots of people can do what they did. So they had no leverage.


i hope the players start their own league with nike...they can probably make 33% of their current salaries, and what they lose in income they can make up for in equity in the new league. David stern and the owners can eat a ****, this is highway robbery.

The executive class in this country has lost their ****ing minds.

Now, this. This is funny. I don't know if you are trying to be funny or not, but well done. Well done.
 
Are there seriously people in this world who are retarded enough to think that having the most posts on an internet message board is a noteworthy accomplishment?

...just a tidbit of information that I thought I'd share with you and the new guys on this board! Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Are you sure you're not just sharing this ultra-stupid tidbit in an effort to get your post count up?

...nah! Can't catch the leader no matter how many times I post. He's got too big of a lead! However, I do lead in posts that contain the phrases "hopper" and "jailhouse tats"!
 
Back
Top