♪alt13
Well-Known Member
It wouldn't happen because of TV. For sure
Lowe: The Basketball Tournament Rule Change That NBA is Watching
- Thread starter Saint Cy of JFC
- Start date
It wouldn't happen because of TV. For sure
Every game would have a game winning shot though. How cool would that be?
There could also be some cool stats to come out of this. There would be a cool clutch stat to measure player performance after the rule triggers.
When I think about it, the only thing I would miss is the sense of fighting against the clock. Like a team being down a point and having 5 seconds left in the game to get a shot. That would largely be lost besides going against a shot-clock. That would be a missed moment in teh NBA, but I think there would be enough exciting moments generated from the new rule to offset by a lot.
There could also be some cool stats to come out of this. There would be a cool clutch stat to measure player performance after the rule triggers.
When I think about it, the only thing I would miss is the sense of fighting against the clock. Like a team being down a point and having 5 seconds left in the game to get a shot. That would largely be lost besides going against a shot-clock. That would be a missed moment in teh NBA, but I think there would be enough exciting moments generated from the new rule to offset by a lot.
lmao, I knew you would like this. I remember when you posted the article on a rule idea to get the midrange shot back with bonus zones.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
I think that game point possessions would be way better than short game clock possessions.
Yeah, anyone who plays pickup knows how intense those possessions are. You could have 4 of those in a row in a NBA game (if both teams are within a basket of winning and they get back-to-back stops each), all being equally as tense as a singular last possession under the old rules.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
It was basically just giving a team 2.5 points for midrange shots.
Guys - golf is taking too long to play and watch and boring, let's just make it 15 holes instead of 18 holes.
That's gonna make golf more popular as well, the less holes, the more scarce, the more popular it will be.
#Sarcasm
That's gonna make golf more popular as well, the less holes, the more scarce, the more popular it will be.
#Sarcasm
While we're at it let's also make baseball an 8-inning game.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
I don't watch basketball for the FTS or timeouts. You are completely missing the point.
Baseball has stuck to a long *** schedule and the sport is dying in popularity
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Little League is 6 innings and that is still too long. The problem is dudes strike out 2/3rds of the time.
I think we could argue a single inning is too long.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
They could replace the pitcher with a maxhine and end strike outs. If more balls were fielded and more dudes got on base it might be worth watching.
IDK, the best part of baseball is watching a good pitcher. The part that sucks about that is that you have to watch a ton of down time between pitches.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Double plays are cool. Watching a great pitcher strike out dude after dude is a drag, imo. Maybe they could move the mound back 15 feet?
Playing pickup basketball to 21 is a good analogy of this new rule. When you get to around 17 points the intensity and defense picks up considerably. The offense would have to be more precise and it would make each possession more valuable.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app