Media Meltdown Sinking Hillary

[babe]

So, here is my analysis of the perils of a Hillary Presidency, from the rational point of view of "management", assuming established interests of various kinds want a certain trajectory of development, a certain kind of progressive change.

No, Game, there is no tight little conspiracy involved, nobody hiding behind the coat rack at DNC or RNC or the White House or any swank NY highrise billionaire whole-floor condo, nor any little band of revolutionaries devoted to Satan who can pull a lot of strings.

It's Mainstreet. It's a community that has developed a common sense of things, who call themselves "communitarians", and who do utilize their connections to personal advantage, like any good as in really, really good Capitalist can do.

You see, it is just this. Human psychology and human sociology.

In all human history, we have a record of trending towards successful management of some kind. Is it so daring to theorize that successful people will see problems and do something to avert some imminent disaster?

Hillary and Bill, with their corrupt dealings have made themselves a threat to the system they have exploited, and like Pres. Ferdinant Marcos of the Philippines way back in 1972, they have gotten too big for their britches, too stuffed for their suits. Too deplorable to be figureheads for real interests with a lot riding on outcomes.

So the question is, when will this recognition become publicly acknowledged. When will the owners of media actually be so nauseated with Hillary even they will just have to do something about it. When will actual fear of the consequences of a Hillary Presidency grip their pocketbooks and become the unspeakable force behind all their contorted moves to avert disaster.

I watched Marcos go from being a Rockefeller boy to the unspeakable embarrassment. Sometimes the Press will turn on these kinds of people.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

I'm sympathetic with your problems, Joe, really.

At a certain age, in most human beings, the mass of believed facts, principles, and relationships of logic does sorta lock down and become unmanageable. Thus we all are in danger of becoming old fogeys in one way or another.

A bong can help. But I don't need it. I have an active imagination. Now, if in your own situation it helps, go for it.

 

[babe]

So, here's the pitfalls around a Hillary Presidency.

The American public expects to be served if not respected, and Hillary will take the fall for the economy going bad. We have run out of money, and out of room to just print enough to keep our bubbles round and shiny. Hillary will be the wicked witch who cuts benefits and unfairly deals out favors to her little crowd of sycophants/supporters, and public outrage will rise to real impeachment proportions, with even RINO republicans and some traditional democrats on board. Hillary does not respect America or Americans, and has no human warmth for people who are suffering.

Her health will progressively fail, and the ideological divide that is rising will come to rift proportions. There might be civil unrest, riots, met with police-state tactics that won't work, and won't work more and more the harder they are pushed.

This is not going to be any smooth ride, for anybody.

Smart money does probably err on the side of caution, judiciously keeping things moving along in ways that promote the certainties and continuities. The more Hillary swoons and titters, the more she rants out of control even with pre-set campaign ploys, because of her unbalanced mental fixation with her Presidential hopes.... the more she gets rattled with stuff she can't control, the scarier she is going to look to Mainstreet.

Meanwhile Trump can be a smooth actor just as well as a rabble rousing "populist", and I see no sign of him being in the least irrational. The rhetoric he employs on the campaign trail is one thing, the stuff he says to insider dealmakers of the Establishment another entirely.

And Trump did check in with the movers and shakers, and continues to do so.

 

[Gameface]

Holy mother ****ing Nostradamus up in here!

 

[str8line]

So, here's the pitfalls around a Hillary Presidency.

The American public expects to be served if not respected, and Hillary will take the fall for the economy going bad. We have run out of money, and out of room to just print enough to keep our bubbles round and shiny. Hillary will be the wicked witch who cuts benefits and unfairly deals out favors to her little crowd of sycophants/supporters, and public outrage will rise to real impeachment proportions, with even RINO republicans and some traditional democrats on board. Hillary does not respect America or Americans, and has no human warmth for people who are suffering.

Her health will progressively fail, and the ideological divide that is rising will come to rift proportions. There might be civil unrest, riots, met with police-state tactics that won't work, and won't work more and more the harder they are pushed.

This is not going to be any smooth ride, for anybody.

Smart money does probably err on the side of caution, judiciously keeping things moving along in ways that promote the certainties and continuities. The more Hillary swoons and titters, the more she rants out of control even with pre-set campaign ploys, because of her unbalanced mental fixation with her Presidential hopes.... the more she gets rattled with stuff she can't control, the scarier she is going to look to Mainstreet.

Meanwhile Trump can be a smooth actor just as well as a rabble rousing "populist", and I see no sign of him being in the least irrational. The rhetoric he employs on the campaign trail is one thing, the stuff he says to insider dealmakers of the Establishment another entirely.

And Trump did check in with the movers and shakers, and continues to do so.

Babe, you might want to think about taking a break from the internet and focus on getting some help, or maybe a girlfriend who can teach you to love someone other than yourself. Your spew has reached epic levels.

 

[babe]

Babe, you might want to think about taking a break from the internet and focus on getting some help, or maybe a girlfriend who can teach you to love someone other than yourself. Your spew has reached epic levels.

Ha ha. This coming from one of the most unbalanced ideologues in Jazzfanz history.

Sorry, the hate you spew with such ad hominem attacks lacking any factual justification is. . . . Just. . . . . Well. . . . .cute.

Face it, you've bought into the Big Lie, the intellectual phoney Liberalism some disingenuously call progressivism today, and have been co-opted into supporting modern Fascism which buys the support of the Urbanized Reservation poor with public tax dollars while in a thousand ways denies them any alternatives their natural human rights would leave open.

Sad, really, to see you duped.

 

[babe]

So NBC has a new poll putting Hillary at 50, Trump at 44 on the two way, 45-40 on the four way race, including a racial breakdown showing the major minorities still go strongly for Hillary.

Hillary has gone Presidential after seeing the nice turn it made for Trump to calm his rhetoric. She didn't even mention Trump while giving a 30 minute speech on her proposals to help the disabled, pointedly disavowing her previous assertions that Trump is an imbecile.

Oh well, I thought the progressive fascists would decide to back Trump since obviously they don't mind fascist Presidents.

Wrong again???

six weeks.

 

[babe]

OK. Dictionary time.

Fascism, n. A system of governance where the decisions derive from influential elites. Babe's Dictionary

1
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition


2
: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality — J. W. Aldridge>

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

folks might think I'm a bit presumptious writing my own definitions, but hey, why not. Pretty clear to me that others do that as well. Webster when he compiled his first dictionary used a survey of words and meanings the best he could, derived from people's usages.

Just fair notice about what I mean by "fascist". A President with a pen and phone, issuing executive orders, and listening to important supporters more than the majority of Americans, is an example of a fascist in my book. A President who acts with disregard for law might be a fascist, but in my book, is only a fascist if a collection of financial backers is encouraging his actions.... otherwise, he's simply a tyrant.

A President who acts in complete disregard for all others is not a fascist, just a tyrant.

The Latin root for Fascia means, simply "connections". In medical practice it refers to a structure that binds or holds things in place, usually a membrane.

I don't think we commonly understand Hitler, if that's what you think of when the word "Fascist" is thrown out in some kind of insulting epithet. Mussolini was more ideologically committed to Fascism, while Hitler was, after he came to real power, pretty autocratic and more like a Tyrant. Mussoline paid attention to what his financial base wanted much better.

Today, America is going more and more Fascist. When 70%^ or more want immigration to be lawful entry and some kind of restrictions limiting entry of "undocumented" folks, and the President ignores the laws on the books and issues an executive order inconsistent with that majority will, the question would require us to understand who is benefitting from the action, who is behind the scenes encouraging it, to decide if it's more "fascist" or "tyrannical", but it is not "democratic", in the sense of governance directed by the people.

In general, if we want "democracy" we need to reform our campaign laws and find a way to make a more democratic system of financing campaigns, meaning less lobbyists, less unbalanced support from some really big donors.

And. lastly, we need to understand media bias when we see it, so we are not just stampeded one way or another.

 

[babe]

The World According To Babe

fair notice, for anyone having any real problem with a distinctly nonconforming point of view.

If everyone saw the world the way I do, I'd need to develop another point of view in my practice of being a contrarian generally.

I studied philosophy a little, and politics a little, and history a lot, and asked the question whether social progress is really "progress". Some have asked me if I want to "go back", say, to some earlier "The Way Things Are" sort of state, in religion or in government. The answer to that is "No."

Because I don't think we ever did things good enough. "A man's reach should exceed his grasp" was what my first mentor sort of influential person told me.

I look at, for example, the United Nations, and find that the idea of state-defined human rights is a formula for less human rights than what was asserted by the American Revolutionaries, who sought to justify their rebellion by observing that the British governance was denying them the rights of ordinary citizens in England they expected as subjects of the Crown. In explaining why their resort to force of arms was justified, they advanced the idea of innate, natural, or God-given human rights that no government could rightly deny.

The United Nations charter does not recognize such an expansive view of human rights. It does not provide for elected representatives to it's corridors of power or governance. So it is a step backwards in my view.

It is a re-invented feudal system where people are subject to elites, the modern notion of "royalty".

So, when you folks support family dynasties like the Bushes or the Clintons, you are going back to feudalism, not advancing towards some kind of wonderful idyllic future.

That's the fact, as I see it.

Trump would be another sort of dynastic figure within the United Nations schema of governance, as the United States is continually deconstructed and absorbed into the new super Fascist world government. The UN may not have a single all-powerful tyrant, but it does have a "connected" group of influential leaders who stand pretty remotely independent of the common folk.

But Hillary would be so bad as a President, she will provoke the reluctant American citizens towards wholesale rejection of the United Nations. That is the problem I have asserted some elitists will have with Hillary, that if they saw it coming, they should prefer Trump as our next Pres.

 

[babe]

Wrong Again

So today I did nothing. Well, I did camp out here in JazzFanz. And I was proven wrong, again.

For the past two months I've been telling my nurse/wife that I have self-diagnosed cancer of the colon, and that I am going to cure it with, well, refined coal ash. She hoots at me and says "Sure. . .."

So yesterday I went to the doctor, who promptly sent me in for a colonoscopy today. I came out clean, as in really, really clean in more than one way. But I am going to have two other problems fixed surgically in the next few months. Inside the year to ride the wave on deductibles. . . .

The discomfort was real, but it wasn't cancer of the colon.

First time for the colonoscopy. I don't even know what happened, and I have no residual complaints, and I ate two BurgerKing fish sandwiches right after.


Oh, the sheer joy of being wrong.

 

[babe]

So I haven't been able to follow the TV news, but I did hear about some MSNBC Hillary supporters commenting on the FBI reopening the Hillary investigation.

So far, generally, it seems that the mainstream media is willing to lose all credibility with the thinking public, properly speaking, as opposed to mere progressives willing to drown in the tank of their own piss and ****. Not reporting major news that should be sensationalized even more than Watergate, on Hillary (and Obama)official use of public office to collect quid from foreign powers to obtaim American public interest concessions, and many other treasonous and criminal actions..... well, the little cult of progressives serves the money interests just enough the big money has stayed with them. Mainstream media is nothing more than a Bannna Republic propaganda clique.

Americans are beginning to realize their game. And starting to vote the bums out.

The worst possible thing for progressive idealists or ideologues will be a Hillary victory. The worst possible thing for the UN or the CFR will be a Hillary victory. Hillary will discredit the entire system.

The FBI investigation is a farce. Comey is positioning himself to avoid himself being criminally charged if Trump wins. And whatever he reveals about Hillary will be covered up nicely by Obama pardons before the material can get too damaging.

Any system of government that gets this far into mere personal aggrandizement will lose public respect, and will fail financially.

The ordinary people who have heard of the American Constitution will dust it off and reinstall it when they are done with this band of thieves.

 

[babe]

So today I did nothing. Well, I did camp out here in JazzFanz. And I was proven wrong, again.

For the past two months I've been telling my nurse/wife that I have self-diagnosed cancer of the colon, and that I am going to cure it with, well, refined coal ash. She hoots at me and says "Sure. . .."

So yesterday I went to the doctor, who promptly sent me in for a colonoscopy today. I came out clean, as in really, really clean in more than one way. But I am going to have two other problems fixed surgically in the next few months. Inside the year to ride the wave on deductibles. . . .

The discomfort was real, but it wasn't cancer of the colon.

First time for the colonoscopy. I don't even know what happened, and I have no residual complaints, and I ate two BurgerKing fish sandwiches right after.


Oh, the sheer joy of being wrong.

So, as the worm has turned, the doctors as in the specialists, have given me a clean bill of health. No surgery. No advice to restrict activity or change my diet or anything. Still gonna go to more doctors though. Never leave anything undone when your deductible is met. Deductibles will double next year, ya know.

Obamacare's higher deductibles and higher premiums mean a lot of people have no real insurance that means anything, practically speaking, but a huge tax increase, effectively speaking. You will be paying outta pocket for everything short of major surgery/cancer/calamity. You buy insurance before for those major things separately, at a very modest premium.

The media letting this news out is the closest thing they've done to sack Hillary, yet. It will be costing her 4 percent of the vote that she was gonna get. Hillary wants the election today before any of you stupid mushrooms realize what is happening to you under her Dump America agenda.

 

[Gameface]

So I haven't been able to follow the TV news, but I did hear about some MSNBC Hillary supporters commenting on the FBI reopening the Hillary investigation.

So far, generally, it seems that the mainstream media is willing to lose all credibility with the thinking public, properly speaking, as opposed to mere progressives willing to drown in the tank of their own piss and ****. Not reporting major news that should be sensationalized even more than Watergate, on Hillary (and Obama)official use of public office to collect quid from foreign powers to obtaim American public interest concessions, and many other treasonous and criminal actions..... well, the little cult of progressives serves the money interests just enough the big money has stayed with them. Mainstream media is nothing more than a Bannna Republic propaganda clique.

Americans are beginning to realize their game. And starting to vote the bums out.

The worst possible thing for progressive idealists or ideologues will be a Hillary victory. The worst possible thing for the UN or the CFR will be a Hillary victory. Hillary will discredit the entire system.

The FBI investigation is a farce. Comey is positioning himself to avoid himself being criminally charged if Trump wins. And whatever he reveals about Hillary will be covered up nicely by Obama pardons before the material can get too damaging.

Any system of government that gets this far into mere personal aggrandizement will lose public respect, and will fail financially.

The ordinary people who have heard of the American Constitution will dust it off and reinstall it when they are done with this band of thieves.

Babe,

Mainstream media is reporting on the emails. There just isn't any meat on the bones of this latest leak. We can all look at those emails, so if it condemns Hillary please feel free to post the relevant passages and show us just how horrible she is.

Again, front page news on CNN. Have heard about it a few dozen times on NPR. Facebook is full of people who have no idea what was leaked only that Hillary is the most corrupt person who's ever lived. The info is out there, and it's not impressive.

 

[Ron Mexico]

Babe,

Mainstream media is reporting on the emails. There just isn't any meat on the bones of this latest leak. We can all look at those emails, so if it condemns Hillary please feel free to post the relevant passages and show us just how horrible she is.

Again, front page news on CNN. Have heard about it a few dozen times on NPR. Facebook is full of people who have no idea what was leaked only that Hillary is the most corrupt person who's ever lived. The info is out there, and it's not impressive.

It also looks more and more like Comey has a political agenda with the way he has/is handling this investigation and his timing. His behavior and the way he has handled it is all outside of typical FBI protocol. I am guessing he will not hold that position for much longer after this election is over. I also find it funny when people like Babe call out "main stream media" like it is some big collaboration or the same person. There are thousands or maybe millions of "main stream" media members each with different approaches and opinions. It is really hard to take people serious when the blame "the media" for something or say all of the media has an agenda. My wife has been a "main stream" media member for 10 years and she definitely does not have an agenda to hide truth or spread propaganda. It just makes me assume someone is ill-informed, uneducated or just a crazy conspiracy theorists that listens to terrible sources for their information and believes it.

 

[The Midnight]

Trump can still win this.



Wow.

 

[♪alt13]

It also looks more and more like Comey has a political agenda with the way he has/is handling this investigation and his timing. His behavior and the way he has handled it is all outside of typical FBI protocol. I am guessing he will not hold that position for much longer after this election is over. I also find it funny when people like Babe call out "main stream media" like it is some big collaboration or the same person. There are thousands or maybe millions of "main stream" media members each with different approaches and opinions. It is really hard to take people serious when the blame "the media" for something or say all of the media has an agenda. My wife has been a "main stream" media member for 10 years and she definitely does not have an agenda to hide truth or spread propaganda. It just makes me assume someone is ill-informed, uneducated or just a crazy conspiracy theorists that listens to terrible sources for their information and believes it.

or

The FBI when investigating a guy for sending inappropriate selfies to a minor found e-mails relevant to the Clinton case. The agents told their boss(Comey) and he thought "****, I have to reopen this case because if I don't it will look like I'm part of a cover up if there is anything illegal in the e-mails." Then he thought "****, I just told congress that the case was closed and I recommended not pressing charges. If I reopen the case and don't inform congress it will look like I'm not only part of a cover up but that I was lying to congress. ****ing Anthony Wiener!"


It's also possible that...

A guy who sends nasty selfies of himself to minors held on to some blackmail.(pardon coming?)

 

[Dr. Jones]

or

The FBI when investigating a guy for sending inappropriate selfies to a minor found e-mails relevant to the Clinton case. The agents told their boss(Comey) and he thought "****, I have to reopen this case because if I don't it will look like I'm part of a cover up if there is anything illegal in them." Then he thought "****, I just told congress that the case was closed and I recommended not pressing charges. If I reopen the case and don't inform congress it will look like I'm not only part of a cover up but that I was lying to congress. ****ing Anthony Wiener!"


It's also possible that...

A guy who sends nasty selfies of himself to minors held on to some blackmail.(pardon coming?)

I agree with the "****" part.

 

[Gameface]

Trump can still win this.



Wow.

How's that?

 

[The Midnight]

How's that?

Email allegations?

 

[Gameface]

Email allegations?

The same one's that didn't matter before? OK.