https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/blogsjazznotes/55905381-62/bell-jazz-lakers-connor.html.csp
Not exactly surprising. But this confirms that the sticking point has been that Bell wants to make his full salary and get paid by the Lakers.
EDIT: Did the Jazz give permission for Bell and his agent to explore other options? Is it a CBA tampering violation for the Lakers to talk to Bell?
The Jazz are paying Raja Bell $3.5 million to sit this one out. The 36-year-old guard has not been with the team since the end of last season and the message out of the Jazz has been one of complete and utter silence when it comes to their estranged veteran.
However, in an interview with team-owned radio station 1280 The Zone, Jazz Senior Vice President Kevin O'Connor was surprisingly candid when it came to Bell's situation, saying that the Jazz want to buy out Bell's contract, but not at the price the veteran sought and that keeping Bell from signing with the rival Lakers could be a factor. [Full disclosure: The interview was conducted by Spencer Checketts and Gordon Monson, a Tribune columnist and drive-time host on The Zone.]
After the Jazz did not trade Bell before Thursday's deadline, reports have resurfaced that the Lakers are interested in adding Bell as they make a push for the playoffs. Hoopsworld's Alex Kennedy reported last week that Bell told "players and friends around the league" that he expects to join the Lakers.
When asked about Bell last week, General Manager Dennis Lindsey offered a customary, "no comment." His predecessor, however, was much more forthcoming in his interview with the team-owned station. Here's the transcript:
O'Connor: I think it's been from the start. We'll be willing to look at a buyout. We're not just going to let him walk away. We're paying him the money. [Checketts: Right] He's going to get money. He can't get all the money from us and then go make more with the Lakers. Oh, thank you. I'd get fired for that. I'd fire me for that.
Checketts: Is it a situation where you would be motivated to keep him under contract so he doesn't play for the Lakers?
O'Connor: Yeah, if we thought that was the best interest of the team. I'd like not to do that. I don't think you want to be in a situation where you're holding somebody hostage in that respect, but let's go back. Raja said, "Hey, I'll take a buyout." We've said it from the start: All we want is a minimum buyout. We never heard from him. He never said yes to it. We would have done it right away.
The full interview can be heard here.
Not exactly surprising. But this confirms that the sticking point has been that Bell wants to make his full salary and get paid by the Lakers.
EDIT: Did the Jazz give permission for Bell and his agent to explore other options? Is it a CBA tampering violation for the Lakers to talk to Bell?