Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
I thought of him too.
it is hard to gauge right now on who to watch in 2014 until this draft and summer are over.
Official Jazz workouts thread
- Thread starter Weezur
- Start date
I thought of him too.
it is hard to gauge right now on who to watch in 2014 until this draft and summer are over.
orangello
Well-Known Member
The Jazz just need a top 5 pick next year to get a solid impact player.
There is only one player outside the top 5 that really gets me excited and that is Exum. I haven't seen a lot of him but what I have been able to watch I was quite impressed.
Also, I do like the idea of WCS. I just wish the Jazz had another pick in next year's draft.
There is only one player outside the top 5 that really gets me excited and that is Exum. I haven't seen a lot of him but what I have been able to watch I was quite impressed.
Also, I do like the idea of WCS. I just wish the Jazz had another pick in next year's draft.
orangello
Well-Known Member
This is what I really like about the 14 draft, take any player in the top 5 and they can fit into the Jazz no matter what players they draft this year.Just watch:
Wiggins-
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Hayward @ SG
Wiggins @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
Parker-
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Hayward @ SG
Parker @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
Randle-
Play really big and go
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Hayward @ SG
Randle @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
Harrison-
Harrison @ PG
Burks @ SG
Hayward @ SG
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
Gordon- (who I feel is most likely to bust out of the top talent in next years draft)
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Hayward @ SG
Gordon @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
And just for fun I will add in one more name
Exum-
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Exum @ SG
Hayward @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
See what I'm talking about!
Wiggins-
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Hayward @ SG
Wiggins @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
Parker-
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Hayward @ SG
Parker @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
Randle-
Play really big and go
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Hayward @ SG
Randle @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
Harrison-
Harrison @ PG
Burks @ SG
Hayward @ SG
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
Gordon- (who I feel is most likely to bust out of the top talent in next years draft)
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Hayward @ SG
Gordon @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
And just for fun I will add in one more name
Exum-
Burks @ PG (I know it is not popular but get over yourself)
Exum @ SG
Hayward @ SF
Kanter @ PF
Favors @ C
See what I'm talking about!
BHP
Active Member
I think in the last scenario Exum will be playing pg.
Thats where I have mainly seen him play. but I guess his growth spurt has moved him to SG
Where's Schroeder?
orangello
Well-Known Member
I said that it didn't matter who the Jazz got this year. I was just showing that I can see anyone being a good fit for the Jazz.
But if we got Schroeder.. how would Harrison be a good fit?
I just don't think Schroeder's the kind of guy who likes to sit on the bench and play nice...
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
So then the competition would bring out the best of both. Seems like a good situation to me.
I called Archie an *** clown.
I said Poythress played like crap.
I said MKG was drafted too high.
I said, a few post back, that I'd watch Poythress, Austin, and Smart (of non-freshman guys)... and only one of those are UK.
These posts are absurdly ill-conceived... or if trolling, completely lack any sort of creativity.
Lol.. agreed.
For the record, from what little I have researched on Andrew Harrison, he sounds like essentially the same player as Tyreke Evans but might just be generally better. Having a pure PG that you know can guard the position, can play next to Harrison, and on a team that he would be in the rotation still at worst (remember, the Jazz don't have a single PG under contract right now, so they still basically need two players anyway), the situation is NOTHING to be concerned about EVEN IF you are foolish enough to ASSUME that you're getting this one particular player in 2014. That's also assuming (there's that word again) that Schroeder is a keeper which would just be terrible. Top to bottom, just astonishingly dumb logic.
STOP ASSUMING.
STOP ASSUMING.
Agree with the sentiment of your post. I am curious, however, how you find Tyreke as a good comp with Andrew?
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
if you don't know where your schröder is go ask your parents. they should have already had this talk with you.
Again, it's limited research (largely because I don't believe there is a lot if conclusive information yet). But the write-up on DX is that he could improve as a facilitator and because of that is a little stuck between positions. The meat of my comparison is that it's not certain how pure of a PG he is (which would theoretically leave room for him to play the 2).
May be he could be like a Dwayne Wade type player? Started out as a PG, but then grew into an off the ball driver/slasher.