I wonder how much of this is an East Coast/NJ vs. Utahr thing too. What I mean is that NJ is the most densely populated state and I would assume response times by law enforcement to 911 calls and such are on average quicker (much quicker?) than many places in Utahr that could be more remote and out of the way. Having said that, for me, locking all my doors, having an alarm system on all doors and windows, and having a dog that's a Chow mix and looks sort of like a wolf makes me feel secure and outweighs any fear, for lack of a better word, I have that my home will be invaded.
Oh yeah, and Trout, you sound like you're a dumbass and will shoot yourself like Plaxico Burress. Please abort all notions of the purchase.
I think you make a pretty good point. In rural areas guns are not alarming. They have a place and serve a purpose that most people understand. In large densely populated cities guns are not normaly carried around and probably the majority are unfamiliar with their use. People in these cities feel like guns are not needed. When they see or hear about guns it is because thugs used them in the commission of a crime, or to kill each other or innocent people. They then decide that guns are bad and that nobody needs them at all for anything. Then they try to tell rural people what they can and can't have and create rules that simply baffle people who have experience with guns.
I've often said the people that make our nation's gun laws are like the people who make Utah's liquor laws; they don't understand them and think that they are unnecessary.
When it comes to regulations, let the people who know about the subject matter make the rules please.
The "Assault Weapons" Ban was about as silly and pointless as Utah's 3.2 alcohol limit for beer.