very sad situation all the way around
made worse today perhaps by reading the transcripts and having the "advantage" (not the right word at all) of those details
I really would like to know what Penn State officials may or may not have been told back in 1998, and what influence they may have used to hush things up at that time. Apparently Penn State is unique in that it is one of the few state institutions anywhere that is exempt from having to keep records of meetings and stuff. (trying to find a link, I just read this in the paper)
edit:
https://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204190704577026060082371298.html
The timing seems suspicious - CYA perhaps?
made worse today perhaps by reading the transcripts and having the "advantage" (not the right word at all) of those details
I really would like to know what Penn State officials may or may not have been told back in 1998, and what influence they may have used to hush things up at that time. Apparently Penn State is unique in that it is one of the few state institutions anywhere that is exempt from having to keep records of meetings and stuff. (trying to find a link, I just read this in the paper)
edit:
Unraveling who knew what in this case could be difficult at Penn State, which was exempted in 2009 by the state from disclosing most records.
Unlike most publicly funded schools nationwide, Penn State is required only to release an annual tax form and the salaries of its directors and highest-paid employees. Information such as meeting minutes, emails and text messages are exempt from release.
https://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204190704577026060082371298.html
The timing seems suspicious - CYA perhaps?
Last edited: