Tatum isn't the versatile point forward or team player that Hayward is. He's got a scorer's mentality and a few moves, but he's still mostly an iso scorer and a ball stopper. He needs to expand his game to be a star.
Last edited:
No. However, I wouldn't be upset if for some reason both players were swapped. Both have extremely high ceilings. The last draft might go down as one of the best ever.Would you take him over Donovan?
I just think with all that young talent, that your gonna have them all demanding minutes. Rozier didn't play as great as he did against Philly, but he's awesome too. Boston is going to have a good few years, but a lot of their young players are going to command big contracts.There is enough playing time for three wings. I think you go to a three wing line-up for the first 6 mins of the 1st and 3rd and then sub out a true PF for one of the wings. To close games, it just depends on the opposition. Brown may be the casualty down the line, but that's a decision for the future. And he'd likely net a pretty good return if/when he's traded.
I'm talking about major deals for franchise players. Especially ones that have won championships.Name the last three teams who have won championships by doing what you’re advocating. Heck, just name the last one team who won a championship without major signings or trades, complete organic and through the draft. Go!
No. However, I wouldn't be upset if for some reason both players were swapped. Both have extremely high ceilings. The last draft might go down as one of the best ever.
Sorry, guess I didn't make it clear enough. I'm talking about superstars that have won championships - franchise players. I miss the days when franchise players stayed with their respective franchises: Stockton, Malone, Bird, Magic, Jordan (going to the Wizards doesn't count).Does that also apply to trades? Not sure how old you are, but would you have stopped being a fan of the Stockton/Malone teams because Utah traded for Hornacek?
How about now...are you not a fan because Lindsey went out and signed Rubio?
Very few teams are primarily organic. Even SA, which has drafted extremely well, still has supplemented their stars with key acquisitions. GS, Houston, OKC, Boston, Toronto, Cleveland: all those teams added at least one of their stars via trade or free agency.
Never. Hayward/Irving/Tatum are their big 3.
Watching Lebron play basketball is precious. An all time great that won’t be around forever. I consider myself lucky whenever I get the chance to see him in more playoff games. Royalty. King James
i dunno Tatum is a nice player, but i just don't see anything that totally screams out superstar. Whereas Brown does some things that are just mouthwatering, i think he's got a higher ceiling.
Was there ever a worse team than this years Cavs making to the finals? Maybe 2002 New Jersey Nets or 1999 Knicks? Honestly, take away James and this team is 30 win team at best...
I said at best so yeah, realistically it is more like 20-25 games.No way this collection of scrubs can win 30 games without Lebron.
No way this collection of scrubs can win 30 games without Lebron.
I said at best so yeah, realistically it is more like 20-25 games.
I haven't really followed how the Cavs got to where they are personnel wise. Can you explain what you are saying here?Lets not forget, this team is Lebrons creation.
If he wasnt such a premadonna he would still have Kyrie, his FO wouldn't be stuck with $80M of unmoveable contracts.
Watching Lebron play basketball is precious. An all time great that won’t be around forever. I consider myself lucky whenever I get the chance to see him in more playoff games. Royalty. King James
If you haven’t seen him live (my guess is you have).... Do. It.
I saw young Bron on row 2 or 3... even his jumpers were amazing... so much pop to his legs and so much lift. He’s a sight in person.
I didn’t love Miami Bron but rooted for him his whole career... so fun and kept his nose clean all these years.
Hayward next year will still easily be their 2nd best player. Maybe not in a couple of years but it's ludicrous to think Brown and Tatum will have the same polished efficient all round games that he has. 14 ppg ?? Farcical suggestion.I dont know if its a sure thing Hayward is going to be the 3rd best player. I could see Brown being better. One good reason is that Hayward might not ever be the same after that injury. Its one thing to break your ankle and another to dislocate it. He did both at the same time. I wouldn't be surprised to see him have some problems with that. Just mentally alone he is going to have to get over it. Also, all he ever was was a borderline allstar. Nothing more.
Now take into account he is going to be sharing the ball a lot more. Taking a lot less shots. So there is a good chance he averages like 14ppg or something. And numbers down all across the board. Thats not going to have the look of a big3 player. Suddenly he will look overpaid.
Plus he and Brad have the daddy/son thing going on. Stevens is going to maximize Hayward as much as he can. Boston is going to have a helluva run for a few years until they have to either go "Cleveland-deep" into the tax or let someone like Brown go. I think they'll make that choice with Smart this year if he gets any kind of decent offer as a RFA.Hayward next year will still easily be their 2nd best player. Maybe not in a couple of years but it's ludicrous to think Brown and Tatum will have the same polished efficient all round games that he has. 14 ppg ?? Farcical suggestion.